Medical Rhetoric Analysis Essay: What Are the Health Benefits of Being Creative?

In the advertised article of "What are the health benefits of being creative?" written by Maria Cohut, she explains her thesis in a persuasive form by highly supporting her topic with several health benefits of being creative. She makes a bold statement by asserting her topic and supports it throughout the article. Marcia makes her topic broad by involving various forms of health benefits of being creative. She informs her audience of the rationality of the article's topic by use of the logos, ethos and pathos rhetorical appeals (Cohut). However, it seems that people normally commence creative quests such as dancing, acting, writing and drawing practices just because they enjoy doing them. Naturally, the writer used logical appeals to show the goodness of creativity to people. She also projects the emotional appeals of pathos and expresses how various creative passions makes people happy. Specifically, the writer tries to answer her question topic of how science contributes to the health benefits of creativity.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

The article argues out its main purpose of answering the question topic on the various health benefits of being creative. Maria suggests that some people pursue the various creative activities as hobbies and others take part in the creative activities to make a living out of it. She used the logistics expressions of logos and mentions that no matter which way people can take in order to unleash their imaginations and the need for the free self-expression, it is truly clear that the act of making up things is actually part and parcel of being human naturally (Cohut). The writer points out an ethical appeal to justify her question topic. She uses historical proves that creativity started with our ancestors, they left the first marks by making drawings of different structures on the walls of some caves. She argues that this proves that we also can go to an extent of saying that our needs to create things are actually in our blood. This ethical fact has served people well over the past years, since various communities have learned to create different tools, make herbal medicines, make shelters, cook foods, and even come up with new types of dishes.

As an evidence in the support of Maria Cohut's thesis, she includes some philosophical arguments of previous authors about the health benefits of creativity. In this criterion, she makes use of the ethos rhetoric appeal and expresses some of the ethical recommendations of several authors on the health benefits of creativity (Cohut). First, the writer mentions an article on the topic "The Picture of Dorian Gray" written by Oscar Wilde. Maria claims that Oscar infamously declared that all forms of art are unserviceable. The writer disagrees with this comment by responding to it questioning him that, "If art is useless, then why did you write so diligently?" On the contrary, Cohut utters that several types of research have been done in the medical field that essentially proves that artistic creativity is highly beneficial for the mental and physical health status. This extends to a point of discussion of some of the various health benefits of creativity from performing different artistic activities.

Maria Cohut extends her arguments by using the powerful tool of rebuttal to actually show the credibility of his arguments by paying particular attention to mention some of the several health benefits of creativity. Cohut starts by mentioning the first health benefit of creativity as an improved mental health from the field of medicine. She argues that several artistic activities like molding, drawing and painting objects by use of clay have actually been scientifically proven to help people deal with the different kinds of trauma that they may experience. She uses an ethical rhetoric appeal to points out an ethical comment in a comprehensive written article on the topic "The Connection Between Art, Healing, and Public Health" written by Jeremy Nobel and Heather L. Stuckey. The writer utters that the two authors truly supports the topic question of the health benefits of creativity and gave an example to it. The two authors broadly suggest that the act of taking part in the various artistic activities really helps people to express the various experiences that are normally difficult to put down on paper. For instance, the diagnosis of cancerous diseases (Lyubormirsky 105). Furthermore, Maria supports the authors by adding that the artistic activities help in the self-expression of an individual. These self- behavioral activities might also contribute to the maintenance or even the reconstruction of positive identities.

The author extensively uses the pathos rhetoric appeal to express personal emotional experiences on the individuals that take part in various artistic activities. She explains this by claiming that there are several studies done that investigate the impacts of writing as an artistic activity. The expressive writings to be specific normally requires the participants to narrate a specific event of choice and responds by explaining how it affected them. The writer claims that this process essentially helps the victims to overcome various trauma and manage the negative emotions (Cohut). Similarly, she adds that in the same criteria as a visual expression, the expressive type of writing really allows people to see the negative circumstances that cannot be changed as the first step. The next step is that the people are able to integrate the negative circumstances into their own lives story, hence create meanings for the events that left ineradicable marks in their lives. She gave some examples of the life events as a loved one's death, a certain medical diagnosis or even a particular violent life experience.

The author asserts the second health benefit as brain-boosting effects from the medical field. She explains her argument by being more specific on the artistic activities of writing. The writer points out vividly that several types of research have truly proven that writing things down can actually help in more learning and memorization skills. She addresses the ethical issue as to whether the participation in artistic activities promotes health benefits of creativity (Lyubormirsky 128). Cohut argues that if someone decides to take a shortcut and types the several ides that one would want to remember, this would not be of much help. Rather, she utters that most researchers suggest that if someone decides to go to the old-fashion way and put every idea on paper is more likely to learn more efficiently than typing.

Moreover, the writer mentions that not only writing skills can help in brain boosting. She proves this by introducing a physicist named Albert Einstein. The physicist confessed that listening to music helped him understand science better to an extent that he would surely have evolved into a being a musician. Maria suggests that making music can also have an impact on how well different areas of the brain communicate with each other. Furthermore, she mentioned a research study that shows people who practice musical skills by learning how to play instruments, have truly improved the connectivity between the two sections of their brains. The writer briefly mentions the physical health benefits of creativity (Schwenk 168). She claims that studies have shown individuals who have actually written about their personal traumatic life experiences that express significant impacts on their physical health.

Works Cited

Cohut, Maria. "What are the health benefits of being creative?" Medical News Today (2018): Retrieved from https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/320947.php

Lyubormirsky, Ryan T. Howell: Margeret L. Kern: Sonja. "Health benefits: Meta-analytically determining the impact of well- being on objective health outcomes." Health Physiology Review 1.1 (2017): 83-136. DOI: 10.1080/17437190701492486

Schwenk, Scott A. Paluska: Thomas A. "Physical Activity and Mental Health." Sports Medicine 29.3 (2000): 167-180. DOI: 10.2165/00007256-200029030-00003