Analysis and Interpretation of Linguistics - Essay Sample

Introduction

Ever since the evolution of language to human beings, man has been seen discovering other existing languages within the globe. Language can be described as the mechanism of sharing information from that are generated within one's thoughts. Linguistics can be described as a branch of science that deals with the study of language whereby linguistics analysis the selected language through its form, meaning, and context. Evolution never stops, ever since man discovered language there had been advancement not only to spoken text but also written text. There are several theories that were developed to get an understanding of how human beings can learn the language, and one of the theories is the nativist theory that suggests that there is a common universal grammar that is applied, but differing communities since the grammar is in our genetic makeup (Bhatia, 2014).

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

The use of language has grown from not only studying its communicative purpose but as also looking at the structure, the form and the context in which the language conveys. Linguistic analysis is carried out to allow one to be able to formulate a comparison concerning the use of language in various context and genres. For instance, one can compare spoken text to written text or even academic writing to fictional literature. Language is an integral part to any man, and when one tries to learn a new language that's when they get to understand that it is quite a hard task since it involves new grammatical rules and even the diction of the wounds the way they sound differs across communities (Ahrens, 2005). The purpose of this research is to understand the use of language in various genres and contexts to understand the relationship that coexists between spoken text and written text.

Before discussing the two chosen texts, one should understand that for effective communication, a great dialogue should portray the following characteristics:

A great dialogue shows an individual's unique characters within their speech, and a greater speaker knows how to construct their words.

The use of shibboleth greatly assists one to distinguish a native speaker or writer from other common ones since it is a tool that is used in creating dialogues that are realistic.

One should understand that there is a difference between written speech and our day to day conversations, henceforth those differences should be noted in one's works.

The character speech of the language also has to change depending on the situation the speaker is in since mankind would have been such a boring species if we communicated at one range of sound intonation and also vocabulary-wise.

Linguistics Analysis and Interpretation

Spoken Text

The first text is spoken in nature, and it's a dialogue between a blogger in YouTube known as Marques Brownlee but popularly known as Kim Ph.D. and one of the world's richest billionaire Billy Gates. They are having a conversation about saving the world and also electric cars, below is the transcription of the dialogue. This type of conversation was more of a dialogue based on the direction and the tone of their conversations. By analyzing and interpreting the dialogue between the two participants I was able to note a few things that explored the use of language within the ideological, interpersonal and textual application of theme. Some of these skills that I was able to underline are as follows:

About the spoken text, I was able to note that language is used in dialogue, not as quality time to tell stories but rather concentrating on the content of the language, Brownlee's questions were brief well-constructed and had drawn the concentration of the audience.

Through observation, there was the use of various communication skills that were unique to each. The way they used their vocabulary, their style of communication, intonations and also the application of cadences made it clear and did not require a name attached to them to know who was speaking.

The dialogue was realistic since it was notable that the interview did not ask questions that were not attached to evidence, rather he did not assume facts. For instance, when Bill gate was asked about his projects in Africa, the question was accompanied by his tweet which was in line with the question.

Also in the spoken dialogue, it was more of a scripted, repetitive and sometimes interrupted in between, unlike written text which is more complex since there are set of rules that are accompanied with the genre. Some words though in spoken text due to being heard over and over again tend to become cliche which should be avoided.

When it comes to spoken speech, it is highly recommendable for one to be a keen listener than a talkative person within the conservation. Language is built in mind and when one pays attention to what the other party is saying; they are giving their brain the power to reconstruct and gather information and also giving the other party their piece of mind to think to answer your questions effectively. When one interrupts a speaker as they are speaking, they happen to confuse the speaker since they have disrupted his chain of thoughts thus making one anxious (Bhatia, 2014).

In the spoken text, hearing and observational skills are the key elements of understanding the language of the speaker if one is vast with the language. Besides, spoken texts do not convey a lot of text embellishments it is purpose driven whereby if certain lines are not pushing forward the plot of the conversation then they are omitted (Bauer, Noulas, Seaghdha, Clark & Mascolo, 2012).

Written Text

For the case of my written text analysis, I decided to use an article that was written by David Gelles and Thomas Kaplan and published by the New York Times, F.A.A. approval of Boeing jet involved in two crashes comes under scrutiny. The article focuses on dealing with the recent regulations put in places and the investigations that are carried out concerning the airplane that crashed recently in Ethiopia, East Africa. The following are some of the language skills that I was able to draw from the article:

Written text can pass communication from one generation and also can cut across time as far as the language that is used is understood at that given time, unlike spoken text which its use is limited to immediate interaction.

Written language happens to be more complex than spoken language since there is a lot of sentence punctuation that is required also written sentences tends to be longer than speech.

Writers often do not receive immediate feedback from their relative audience unless it has more to do with online platforms.

In writing, one cannot change or utter anything from a written document that has already been printed out henceforth making it permanent.

Conclusion

Language is considered to be a major form of communication to all mankind, and language can be identified to sounds and symbols that when they are combined convey meaning through the written or verbal system. The way we communicate with each other one can easily tell a person character from their speech, in support of the theory of nativist grammar is part of the human genetic make-up henceforth making it part of us and part of our character. The way we deliver our text either through writing or through speaking depends on the person general understanding of the language.

The reason as to why learning a new language becomes difficult while when we were children, no one taught us how to talk it just came naturally this is due to the environmental factors that surround us (Ahrens, 2005). One can adapt effectively to a language whereby he/she has been largely exposed to since language is not only about speaking or writing; it involves other elements that need to be considered. For, instance some languages in some communities the intonation of the speech and even the communication style varies, for this very reason that's y we have accents of our first language when we try to learn a new language.

References

Tagliamonte, S. A. (2006). Analysing sociolinguistic variation. Cambridge University Ahrens, B. (2005). Analysing prosody in simultaneous interpreting: difficulties and possible solutions.

Bhatia, V. K. (2014). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. Routledge.

Bauer, S., Noulas, A., Seaghdha, D. O., Clark, S., & Mascolo, C. (2012, September). Talking places: Modelling and analysing linguistic content in foursquare. In 2012 International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2012 International Confernece on Social Computing (pp. 348-357). IEEE.

Copland, F., & Creese, A. (2015). Linguistic ethnography: Collecting, analysing and presenting data. Sage.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/19/business/boeing-elaine-chao.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4mxXdCUXSSs

Malcolm, I. G., & Sharifian, F. (2002). Aspects of Aboriginal English oral discourse: An application of cultural schema theory. Discourse Studies, 4(2), 169-181Press.