Should Smoking in the Public Be Allowed? - Essay Sample

Introduction

The norms of smoking in public places have brought about lots of discussions over the world (Rutherford). A good example is an initiative taken by most of the U.S. states to ban smoking tobacco in public places. Unfortunately not all cities adhere to such norms since Kentucky one of the critical tobacco consumers is in a constant dilemma of analyzing the advantages and disadvantages on the use of the product; thus, a clear indication that there are higher chances for it not being banned (Rutherford). Indeed, the topic has brought about much anticipation since it has drawn the attention of economics, health professionals and political analysts to determine if it is safe to smoke on a public environment. Therefore, even though smokers will protect their rights to consume tobacco at any given time and place and non-smokers will oppose such acts, the paper agrees to the standards of banning smoking in public places by evaluating the effects of tobacco on third parties.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Smoking has severe adverse health consequences. Since the topic reflects on the public, there is limited analysis in the smoker's health but that of the entire community (Rutherford). Unlike other use of drugs such as the abuse of alcohol that affects only the user, smoking is linked to the city as a whole; thus, its usage has tangible, measurable and permanent effects (Rutherford). Expose to tobacco smoke is harmful to one's health even though the scope of the impact is debatable (Rutherford). First, research indicates that the banning of smoking in public places can aid in reducing the rate of heart attacks by roughly 36 per cent globally (Rutherford). Moreover, smoking is linked with breath, heart illnesses and cancer that mount on the victims for decades. (Rutherford) The public is more exposed to such harm with minimal knowledge. Furthermore, scientific evidence display that smoking has both short-term and long-term impacts on innocent bystanders. Lastly, cigarette packaging is one of the leading litters polluting the environment.

Most developed and developing nations promote environmental health and hygiene; thus, ensuring that the community is safe (Rutherford). Millions of cigarette packaging are done on a single day; thus, making the rate of littering on various public environments to increase or steadily rise (Rutherford). Next, cigarette butts are among the million pieces of litters that distract the aesthetic composition of an open atmosphere (Rutherford). The issue involves the irresponsible behavior of the smoker who lacks the sense of disposing of these waste appropriately; therefore, not exposing the environment to hazards. The ban of smoking can minimize the litter since the smokers will need to only smoke at designated areas which are also well equipped with litter bins (Rutherford). Indeed, such a claim establishes norms that promote hygiene and the well-being of the community. A good example is that banning smoking in public sectors will not expose younger generations to adapting to the norms of smoking anywhere and anyhow since they will grow up observing and abiding by the criteria of the community.

Conclusion

To conclude, smoking in public places need to be banned since it will serve the greater good. First, if smoking is banned the innocent bystanders will not be exposed to health hazards such as cancer and heart illnesses. Next, the environment littering probability will reduce, since cigarette butts and packaging will be disposed of appropriately; thus, favouring acute community well-being and sanitary environment.

Work Cited

Rutherford, Jack. 5 reasons to ban smoking in public places. 23 October 2009. <https://www.richmondregister.com/news/lifestyles/reasons-to-ban-smoking-in-public-places/article_f0830ffb-2986-5232-99aa-c77c61a2fb01.html>. Accessed on 21 February 2019