Inventing the University by Bartholomae Essay

The purpose of writing 'Inventing the University' by Bartholomae is to inform instructors from various universities on how they should portray their essays in standard forms. According to the author, the questions of standards were brought up after it was noted that for the last twelve years students only learned one method of writing their essays. Another reason why Bartholomae wrote this article is to assist the students to understand that while writing they should not try to change themselves by impressing their instructors. The writers should also gain the basic knowledge of writing an essay in a better way without adding unnecessary words that makes the paper to lose focus. The article will look at the author's arguments, audience, reasoning, purpose, appeals, and evidence while applying ethos, logos and pathos and how they provide the key to knowing the impact of Bartholomae's short essay.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

The arguments and audience used in Bartholomae essay play a significant role in how he will present the purpose of this article. For instance, the author is strictly writing this piece to the audience of both students and teachers by persuading them to use the method mentioned in the teachings of 'Inventing the University.' The author does this as his purpose and audience by providing a few examples in the text. A good example is when he first introduces an intriguing piece written by a college freshman student. Bartholomae describes the essay has the functional language from 'inventing the university' and both general and a text-book like finishing (Bartholomae 210).

Bartholomae also uses another example by the teaching of a different way of writing that one should use. He criticises the essay for its inability to speak as a status, privilege or a person. (Bartholomae 212) By providing an academic or technical discussion. The use pathos is seen in the two pieces of criticism towards to make the audience believe what he is trying to persuade particularly on the benefits of using the techniques from 'inventing the university,' (Rule 78). In other words, the targeted audience must either learn how to narrate their essays by using the techniques or create lesson plans for deciphering and learners where knowing the language is vital for the teachers.

Throughout Bartholomae writing, it is clearly shown that one needs to bring his methods when writing an article. He even does this by stating the author must make use of the specialized language in their vocabulary while studying the topic in the field of writing. (Bartholomae 223). For this to be accomplished Bartholomae uses pathos by mimicking and assembling its language when finding the compromise between the requirements of the convention and idiosyncrasy (Bartholomae 209), Still, Bartholomae also does this by asking the importance of following his instructions. For him, when one neglects using the techniques of his article, they then lose their credibility.

Bartholomae states that "it would make no sense at all to have a carpenter have a dialogue with a science professor discussing genetics while using the carpentry language," (Bartholomae 243). In other words, if a student adapts to the language of 'inventing the university' and speak regarding someone's privilege or status, then the reader will be persuaded even if the narrator is uneducated. The author vaguely uses ethos to point out to the readers that when a student or teacher uses defiance of default language rather than what is in 'inventing the university' to speak to people, then they will be offering their wisdom to the audience (Bartholomae 212). The author also tries to insinuate that the writer and audience should have spoken on language to prove an understanding and credible argument on the subject addressed.

Towards Bartholomae appeals the author still maintains a tremendous logical, and ethical (logos and ethos) appeal throughout his essay. He established these credibility's in various ways by adding to his ethos. For instance, Mike Rose mentions of 'inventing the university' to make everyone develop a common language (P. 55). The author also does this by considering that his audience consists of literary teachers and that the language they use should relate to everything they are persuading the students to understand (Rose 75).

To relate to this Bartholomae uses pathos by collecting a few resources like the essays written by the students and reviews them in the language of 'inventing the university,' (Bartholomae 143). To add on this Bartholomae brings in two authors (Linda S. Flower and Aristotle) to support his arguments. By doing so, his points are effectively shown because it's not only his theories state that the use of a common language is important. The use of logos in his piece is seen when Bartholomae uses the sources from other authors to provide detailed examples and facts that support his argument (Borvey et al., 78). The two students essay and the misuse of 'inventing the university' as well as using quotes from two other authors to create a useful logical aspect in his piece.

Throughout the essay, Bartholomae maintains the use of logos, pathos, and ethos by creating is ways added to his ethos. The method he tried to argue out concerning how essays should be written should be in the same line with the understanding of the reader. Considering that people understand things in different ways, the writer should use a language that is familiar to the audience (Derian 24). Once this method is followed, the writer will gain credibility from both the audience as well as the students. Most of the methods used by Bartholomae shows ways he uses pathos including external resources as examples to make them understand how to use the appropriate language (Derian 24). By doing so, Bartholomae effectively points out elaborates that he is not alone when he argues about the use of language. For logos, Bartholomae gives uses various resources and authors to provide detailed and facts to support his claim of using good language (Derian 31). Most details used in the external material show how several essays written by various students misuse their language just as Bartholomae arguments. By use of this useful logical facts are demonstrated.

The use of emotional appeal (Pathos) in Bartholomae article is also used throughout the essay. Throughout, Bartholomae uses calm and helpful tone to discuss how the essay's instructions are neglected as per the terms that should be used in 'Inventing the University,' (Friedrich 65). His voice shifts to a more critical tone but in the absence of strength to expose his emotional appeal to the readers. The deficiency of pathos also assists the author in connecting directly with his audience. If Bartholomae used strong and harsh emotions in his article against the mater, then the teachers and student audience may see his arguments as less credible because he would not have been open (Friedrich 68). However, if Bartholomae spoke the importance of the message of the piece meekly would not have made sense. With all this said, the use of pathos revealed in the text indubitably shows the purpose of Bartholomae article despite having a weak presence (Elbow 93).

Finally, the structures of Bartholomae piece has an undoubtedly impart sector in his article. In the beginning, the author defines and introduces the most important piece in his essay. Over a glimpse, the author knew how to plan his discussions by grasping the attention of readers by making them understand how the use of functional language is important in the works of any literature (Han 91). By use of this, Bartholomae uses a specific example by using specific techniques that the college students use in their essays. It is also vital for the readers according to the author to understand the use of language (Han 91). Such examples assisted the author in defining the importance and purpose by ultimately making him argue his claim.

Conclusion

To point out the claim of Bartholomae, the author adds another way by giving another example of how the students write their essay. This makes the reader gain more understanding by seeing how the article lacks the strength and credibility without the case revealed in 'inventing the university.' Bartholomae also uses a sequence of the sample that is vital to point out the argument so that the audience can understand the terms to use while writing an excellent essay. After all, Bartholomae also wraps up his article by mentioning the two authors to support his arguments. He does this by bringing in to authors to validate.

Bartholomae argument does a good job by presenting his evidence and the purpose of bringing it. He shows this to his audience (students and teachers) by suing pathos and logos in a way that attention is given to the audience to persuade to them the reason why he brought the idea of the use of a common language. The author's arguments were also organized in a way that assisted the audience to gain enough understanding of the use of the techniques in 'Inventing the university' and the reasoning behind using the same language. Rhetorically Bartholomae essay sets a clear vision for the audience by supporting his arguments and why it's important to use the same language. The author uses a soft voice to make sure that while he still argues the use of specific techniques vividly is vital while writing an essay. The purpose of the methods also applies throughout the essay.

Throughout the essay, Bartholomae maintains the use of logos, pathos, and ethos by creating is ways added to his ethos. The method he tried to argue out concerning how essays should be written should be in the same line with the understanding of the reader. Considering that people understand things in different ways, the writer should use a language that is familiar to the audience (Derian 24). Once this method is followed, the writer will gain credibility from both the audience as well as the students. Most of the methods used by Bartholomae shows ways he uses pathos including external resources as examples to make them understand how to use the appropriate language (Derian 24). By doing so, Bartholomae effectively points out elaborates that he is not alone when he argues about the use of language. For logos, Bartholomae gives uses various resources and authors to provide detailed and facts to support his claim of using good language (Derian 31). Most details used in the external material show how several essays written by various students misuse their language just as Bartholomae arguments. By use of this useful logical facts are demonstrated.

The use of emotional appeal (Pathos) in Bartholomae article is also used throughout the essay. Throughout, Bartholomae uses calm and helpful tone to discuss how the essay's instructions are neglected as per the terms that should be used in 'Inventing the University,' (Friedrich 65). His voice shifts to a more critical tone but in the absence of strength to expose his emotional appeal to the readers. The deficiency of pathos also assists the author in connecting directly with his audience. If Bartholomae used strong and harsh emotions in his article against the mater, then the teachers and student audience may see his arguments as less credible because he would not have been open (Friedrich 68). However, if Bartholomae spoke the importance of the message of the piece meekly would not have made sense. With all this said, the use of pathos revealed in the text indubitably shows the purpose of Bartholomae article despite having a weak presence (Elbow 93).

Finally, the structures of Bartholomae piece has an undoubtedly impart sector in his article. In the beginning, the author defines and introduces the most important piece in his essay. Over a glimpse, the author knew how to plan his discussions by grasping the attention of reader...