Project Analysis Essay

How to Improve the Project?

The project has well captured its concerned problem in an extensive manner. However, there are some aspects in which there is need to be improved to aid in passing the intended information. The project involves the use of complex terms such as Meta-analysis and Design-lab which are not well understood by the general public and so the information is only limited to persons who well understand the intense terms used in the project. The researcher can reduce the extent to which difficult to understand terms have been used to ease understanding of the project as a way of making the project better thus improving its usefulness. The research question that has been brought up is unclear to the expected viewer of the project. The researcher failed to explain how the generated evidence products, decision-making tools, and capacity building tools will help to strengthen the capability of financial institutions to scale up their investment in climate resilience. The researcher needs to explain how financial institutions will benefit from increasing their investments in climate resilience and why financial institutions and other private and public organs the countries where the research is piloted cannot increase climate resilience investments on their own. The project can be improved by a factor in single individuals who are willing to invest in climate resilience. The countries that the research piloting will take place can be categorized under developing nations which, in most cases, have citizens who are able to invest in climate resilience and therefore, including them in the research will result to a significant increase in climate resilience investments.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

What the Project Should Address?

The project has looked at how several financial institutions and multilateral can increase their investments in climate resilience but it has failed to look at why financial institutions distant themselves from increasing their investments in climate resilience, therefore, the project needs to address issues which discourage these institutions from scaling-up their investments alongside the main research question.

Strengths of the Project

The project has a number of potentialities in answering the research question developed. One of the core strengths of the project is that it has fully exhausted all the information required to answer the research question by giving a clear explanation in each supporting statement. The researcher has organized the project in a state whereby the ability acquitted by the research structure brings out the concrete question on the resilience in climate. Enough information about the kind of partnership that the research needs to be successful has been clearly outlined which have covered all the regions that the project was targeted. The countries chosen to pilot the research project are also well picked since they are most appropriate in representing all the regions involved with climate resilience.

Weaknesses of the Project

The project has some weaknesses in which the researcher need to work on them to reduce chances of discarding. The project has failed to explain why some financial institution cannot increase their investment on climate resilience and this leaves users of the project wondering why such institutions distant themselves from climate resilience. The project also does not explain how the increased investment will be used in climate resilience although it is calling for more investments. The researcher has not specified the target of the project thus, it is accessed by any individual while the concerned parties may pass the research not knowing it was directed to them.