Misuse of Opioid-Mediated Placebo in Sports - Essay Sample

Introduction

Doping has become a global issue following sporting events of international scope around the world. It addresses both the ethical and the moral standing of the parties involved. The International Olympic Committee has led the rest of the world of sports in trying to put an end to the issue with little effect due to the multi-faceted nature of the problem. The case has remained contrary to what was previously expected. Use of the stimulants drugs in sports undermine the spirit of sport and poses problems to the athletes (Mudrak, Slepickaand Slepickova, 2018). Professional athletes mirror the young adult and youthful populations who mimic their actions which include drug abuse.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Thesis

The use of Opioid-Mediated Placebo that stimulates and enhances sporting performance goes against the anti-doping laws and poses severe risks to the health, ethics and career of the athletes.

Summary of Main Ideas

When used, the performance-enhancing drugs (PEDs) such as opioid-mediated placebo triggers performance an action that merits legal investigation since it violates the anti-doping rules and the spirit of the competition in the sport.

Doping in sports remains an essential global issue in the world of athletics both for the athletes, their families, and other sections of stakeholders.

Participation in top professional sports is a matter that entails ethics, and hence enhancing performance via opioid-mediated placebo responses calls to question the proper judgment of the athlete.

The use of opioid-mediated placebo responses may amount to unintended doping even for athletes who may not expressly intend to achieve an advantage over their competitors.

Opioid-Mediated Placebo Responses meets the threshold for the definition of doping because violate the spirit of the competition in the sport and enhance the performance of the athlete.

The use of Opioid-Mediated Placebo Responses to ease pain and enhance performance threatens the health of the sportsmen and women involved, and hence must be abated at all cost.

The use of chemical substances to enhance the body performance has adverse effects to the health and safety of the user as opposed to sentiments supposed by proponents of doping.

The use of opioid mediated placebo responses must be abated at all costs for the sake of the young athletes and aspiring sportsmen and women to safeguard the integrity of the sport.

Main Idea 1

Claim

Opioid-mediated placebo responses boost pain endurance and physical performance, and this merits legal investigation for validation Opioid-Mediated violates the spirit of the competition in the sport. Doping in sports remains an essential global issue in the world of athletics both for the athletes, their families, and other sections of stakeholders.

Evidence

Top professional sports are normally surrounded by significant economic, political as well as business interests. In such instances, only the best athletes are allowed to compete and this exerts pressure and psychological cost for the people involved (Crawley et al., 2017).

According to Mudrak, Slepickaand Slepickova (2018), the use of the performance enhancers drugs is sometimes stimulates by the motivation emanating from the peer groups or top end officials. As a result, the participants get motivated to participate and satisfy the promises as well as raise their self esteem.

Significance

Many children are being raised in environments that have few open spaces and which are shaped by modern media and digital space. Such an environment makes little room for the appreciation of leisure and physical activity. Infiltration of the food industry has changed children's diets by an increase in the intake of foods rich in calories.

Main Idea 2

Claim

Participation in top professional sports is a matter that entails ethics, and hence enhancing performance via opioid-mediated placebo responses calls to question the proper judgment of the athlete. The use of opioid-mediated placebo responses may amount to unintended doping even for athletes who may not expressly intend to achieve an advantage over their competitors.

Evidence

Among the elements to be satisfied for an action to be termed doping, it must alter the performance and must give the athlete an advantage over the competition. Doping was expected to be reduced by the increase in programs of education, supportive medical treatments as well as technologies in testing. Such foods have low fiber content and lead to high rates of metabolism (Martinez-Sanz et al., 2017). Moreover, discussions must be done concerning any forms of supplements with regards to their effectiveness, provenance, as well as effectiveness before it is recommended for consumption.

Mudrak, Slepickaand Slepickova (2018) posit that adolescents are the ones who depict the highest level f moral disengagement toward doping since they intend to gain higher approval by their colleague friends within their peer group.

Significance

Athletes must shun from using supplements without the necessary medical need to treat an illness, or deficiency as this may lead to other complications that may prevent the athlete from competing in the future.

Main Idea 3

Claim

Opioid-Mediated Placebo Responses meets the threshold for the definition of doping because violate the spirit of the competition in the sport and enhance the performance of the athlete. The use of Opioid-Mediated Placebo Responses to ease pain and enhance performance threatens the health of the sportsmen and women involved, and hence must be abated at all cost.

Evidence

The increase in the athlete's ability to endure pain is normally robust and real and such attributes can be relevant to sporting activities (Benedetti, Pollo & Colloca, 2007). Doping is a matter of great concern to the world of sporting today and athletes ought to be aware that they stand a chance to lose their fertility because of indulgence in use of drugs for performance.

Mudrak, Slepickaand Slepickova (2018) further acknowledges that the use of performance-enhancers drugs abuse the sports motivation and de-motivates the sporting activity.

Significance

Doping of blood increases the amount of hemoglobin, which is a component carrying Oxygen gas, within the bloodstream. The same case occurs with the use of Opioid-Mediated Placebo Responses. Increase in the amount of hemoglobin concentration increases the amount of Oxygen that in turn fuels the muscles of the athlete. Thinning of the blood increases performance and stamina, more so in events that go on for long, for instance, cycling and running.

Main Idea 4

Claim

The use of chemical substances to enhance the body performance has adverse effects to the health and safety of the user as opposed to sentiments supposed by proponents of doping. The use of opioid mediated placebo responses must be abated at all costs for the sake of the young athletes and aspiring sportsmen and women to safeguard the integrity of the sport (Mudrak, Slepickaand Slepickova, 2018).

Evidence

Physicians caught up in the claims of assisting the athletes in doping claimed to be assisting their bodies in the process of homeostasis. The central argument pointed to the ability to boost the levels of testosterone back to normal in case they were low due to overtraining or in other cases heavy competition (Martinez-Sanz et al., 2017). Exhaustion of the multiday events of endurance could be cured with a small blood transfusion.

According to Mudrak, Slepickaand Slepickova (2018), performance enhancing drugs introduces a severe problem both in the leisure and competitive sports. Although it can be perceived as good by those who use the drugs, the action is a violation to the spirit of fair play and poses adverse health concern such as cardiovascular psychiatric disorders and neurological diseases.

Significance

In other instances, it could be cured using agents that stimulate erythropoiesis. Such doctors claimed to strictly monitor their patients and hence any risks of medication were averted. However, cases of complications due to treatment abound. Therefore both the athletes and their coaches need to be aware of all the consequences concerned with doping.

Conclusion

Restatement of Argument

Overall, medical procedures aimed at enhancing true performance such as the use of Opioid-Mediated Placebo Responses to boost endurance of pain amounts to doping and must be avoided at all cost to give all the players a level ground for competition. Due to their threat to ethical standards and the sporting activity use of performance-enhancers drugs should be keenly evaluated and abolished. In addition, use of doping drugs is associated with serious health complications such as cardiovascular, neurological and psychiatric disorders. Compounded together, the adverse effects of doping are so severe that they should be abolished to eternity.

The Significance of Main Points

The modern society is obsessed with physical appearance and success in sporting activities. This has led to increased reports of misuse of performance enhancement drugs. Such substances have tarnished the reputation and the health of many world-class athletes, some of whom have been banned from participating in any sporting activities.

Concluding Statement

The effects accrued from the use of certain drug have led to their widespread use for recreation by many athletes. One of the growing markets for doping steroids is among the young school going boys and girls who desire to have bodies defined by their muscles.

References

Crawley, F., Hoyer, P., Mazur, A., Siderius, L., Grosek, S., Stiris, T., & Neubauer, D. (2017). Health, integrity, and doping in sports for children and young adults. A resolution of the European Academy of Paediatrics. European Journal of Pediatrics, 176(6), 825-828. https://doi-org.auth01.norquest.ca/10.1007/s00431-017-2894-z

Fabrizio Benedetti, Antonella Pollo, & Colloca, L. (2007). Opioid-Mediated Placebo Responses Boost Pain Endurance and Physical Performance: Is It Doping in Sports Competitions? Journal of Neuroscience, 27(44), 11934 -11939.doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3330-07.2007

Martinez-Sanz, J. M., Sospedra, I., Ortiz, C. M., Baladia, E., Gil-Izquierdo, A., & Ortiz-Moncada, R. (2017). Intended or Unintended Doping? A Review of the Presence of Doping Substances in Dietary Supplements Used in Sports. Nutrients Review, 9(1), 1-22.doi: 10.3390/nu9101093.

Mudrak, J., Slepicka, P., & Slepickova, I. (2018). Sport motivation and doping in adolescent athletes. PLoS ONE, 13(10), 1-16. https://doi-org.auth01.norquest.ca/10.1371/journal.pone.0205222