Maximizing Health Benefits: Implementing & Evaluating a Community Health Promotion Plan - Essay Sample

Introduction

Implementation and evaluation of the proposed community health promotion plan are important in changing people's lifestyles. Effective implementation and evaluation of the health promotion plan require prior identification of important resources (Cislaghi et al., 2019). All community health stakeholders are required to participate in implementing and evaluating the efficacy of the promotion plan. Also, the health stakeholders contribute to minimizing risks of diseases and promoting community safety. Safety and minimization of risks are essential in reducing the causes of disease outbreaks in society. According to the American Nursing Association (2011), the role of community health promotion is to ensure the safety of people and help in reducing risks of diseases through education. Recommendations provided under the community health promotion plan helps in reducing the risks related to diabetes in the United States of America. First, the provision of modern facilities for handling victims in the community help in reducing the prevalence of diabetes in the American population. Providing modern health facilities will help in ensuring that the resources are sufficient for all patients; therefore, reducing straining. Second, Community-based education is crucial in ensuring that the community knows predisposing factors of the disease; therefore, minimizing the incidences of diabetes in America (American Nursing Association, 2011).

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Implementation Process

Timeline for Implementation

The community health promotion plan works best works well when there is an appropriate implementation process (American Nursing Association, 2011). Appropriate timeline guides all community health stakeholders in the plan adoption process. Appropriate implementation of the health promotion plan requires more than three months. The rationale for selecting this timeline is based on the fact that community health promotion involves various activities like identification of the potential problem, defining population with the highest risk, collecting data, and developing the appropriate nursing intervention.

The first month of the implementation process involves identifying the problem. Community needs are the main considerations to analyze the problem identification stage. The problem is analyzed based on the health status of the community. Many factors affect the community's well-being and health status (Cislaghi et al., 2019). In this case, many entities, individuals, and stakeholders in the community play important roles in identifying the problem. The second month involves data collection to determine the incidences and prevalence of diabetes among different groups of people in the community. The last stage is an assessment of community-based education in health promotion. It is important to allocate enough time to ensure effective implementation of the community health promotion plan (EvansAgnew, Reyes, Primomo, Meyer, & MatlockHightower, 2017).

Resources Needed for Implementation Process

Resources are essential in ensuring effective performance in all health practices. The implementation of a community health promotion plan requires the appropriate utilization of resources to improve people's well-being and reduce disease risks. First, funding is required to ensure that all data collection, processing, and implementation of the health promotion plan is achieved. Community health stakeholders, federal and state governments, and medical organizations provide funding during the implementation process (Cislaghi et al., 2019). Second, literature materials are essential in analyzing the efficacy of community-based education in promoting people's health and well-being. Evidence-based information from reputable sources is pivotal during the implementation process. For example, the American Nursing Association, the Missouri Department of Health, the Transition Advisory Team provide resource material with evidence-based information that aids in the implementation process (American Nursing Association, 2011).

Third, qualified personnel is crucial in establishing appropriate implementation guidelines. Also, experienced staff work collaborates to ensure that the community health promotion plan is implemented within the required timeline. The location provides considerations for determining the risk factors associated problem identified in the community (EvansAgnew et al., 2017). For example, the incidence of diabetes in America may be affected by the location of people. In this case, the differences in disease prevalence vary due to location.

Delivery of the Plan

Community health stakeholders serve as the driving force in the plan implementation process. Health stakeholders include federal and state governments, caregivers, nursing associations, community groups, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and any other interested party or individual. The stakeholders provide policies, guidelines, and other important resources required in implementing the health promotion plan. Also, funding is obtained through a direct donation from the stakeholders. The major role of both federal and state governments is to develop practical health policies that guide and regulate all implementation processes.

A community delivery system is essential in health promotion because the main objective of the plan is to enhance inclusivity through decision-making and application of risk prevention measures. Teamwork is an appropriate community delivery approach for improving the health status and well-being of all people in the community (Marcus-Varwijk, et al., 2018). Teamwork and collaboration among the community health stakeholders work best as a delivery system for creating public awareness on the risk factors related to diabetes. Community-based education and evidence-based practice are pivotal interventions for the delivery system used in the implementation process. Mass sensitization through public health education is an effective community delivery because diabetes is a lifestyle and controllable disease (Marcus-Varwijk, et al., 2018).

Evaluation

Data Collection, Analysis, and Future Planning

Data collection techniques contribute to attaining an effective evaluation process (Khadgi et al., 2017). For example, qualitative and quantitative data are evaluated differently; therefore, affecting research outcomes. Some of the data collection methods employed in the study include health surveys, interviews, and the use of an ecomap. The surveys were conducted in certain geographical areas with a high prevalence of diabetes in the United States of America. During the surveys, data were collected and recorded for analysis.

Also, some health facilities like Holy Cross Hospital and White Oak Hospital provided reputable data during the survey activities. Interviews were conducted to collect evidence-based information. Margarette Acevero, coordinator of the diabetes program at Holy Gross community health was interviewed in the data collection process. The use of ecomaps allowed for the collection of data based on diagrammatic parameters. Also, ecomaps provided information about complications related to increased cases of diabetes in the community.

Check sheet analytical tool was used in determining data outcomes. The check sheet tool allowed for a practical presentation of data collected in the study. This tool is important because it allows the analysis of both qualitative and quantitative data. Also, the application of the check sheet approach helps in determine some future uses of the analyzed data (Khadgi et al., 2017. For example, the data will be used in assessing the incidence and prevalence of diabetes. In some cases, the data will be applied in the future to determine the community's health status and well-being. According to Khadgi et al. (2017), data may be used in the future to develop appropriate plans for minimizing the complications related to diabetes in the community.

Resources Needed for Evaluation

The Community Health Assessment and Resource Team (CHART) play an important role in the evaluation process (American Nursing Association, 2011). Competent and experienced staff determine the efficacy of the evaluation process (American Nursing Association, 2011). CHART provides technical assistance and human resources needed in evaluating the efficacy of community health promotion plans in counteracting the increased prevalence of diabetes. The staff is responsible for educating people on the predisposing factors of diabetes and how to reduce related complications in society. Also, the staff develops appropriate nursing interventions or strategies that can be used in lowering the incidence of diabetes in the population. For example, lifestyle change is critical in managing weight; therefore, preventing the chances of being diabetic.

Federal and state governments provide the required funding for adopting the community health promotion plan in minimizing the cases of diabetes in the United States of America. Funds may also be obtained from private sectors like no-governmental organizations (NGOs) and other interested groups or individuals in the community. Funds are important in evaluating the efficacy of community-based education in the healthcare sector; especially in public health promotion (Myers, Wolfer, & Hogan, 2017).

Description of the Community Partners Involved in the Evaluation

The community health nurses are mandated with the responsibility of applying Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) in identifying and assessing the health system of the community (American Nursing Association, 2011). EBP is an extensive approach that requires the participation of different stakeholders in improving the community's health status and well-being. First, federal and local governments are primary partners because they provide funding resources needed in the process of implementing and evaluating the community health promotion plan. Also, the government develops policies that guide the staff and other stakeholders in applying the health promotion plan.

Second, the Holy Cross agency provides practical diabetes awareness and prevention programs through management and lifestyle change. Holy Cross group obtains funds from donors and community benefit groups. The funds are used in managing operations and obtaining other basic resources. Also, the agency offers a wide range of diabetic information based on the community's demographic characteristics. Third, Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) are the leading fund donors. The NGOs may also appoint some experienced and competent staff to assist in developing applicable interventions for accentuating people's health and well-being (Myers et al., 2017). Another partner is the World Health Organization (WHO) because it offers amicable solutions for preventing the risks of diabetes.Conclusion

Based on the findings obtained from the literature, the prevalence of diabetes is highest among the Whites in the United States of America. Racial diversity contributes to the varying prevalence of diabetes in the United States of America. Community health education is vital in managing cases of diabetes in America, especially among Whites. In this case, communities living around the Holy Cross facility are more aware and sensitized on the complications caused by diabetes. Many community health facilities should be established to address the needs of all people in the United States of America. People should be educated on the need to change their lifestyles to reduce risk factors of diabetes. EBP should be applied to creating quality guidelines during plan implementation and evaluation. Nursing homes should be established to provide Prevention of diabetes is important than treatment.

References

American Nursing As...