Is Abortion Legally & Morally Permissible? - Research Paper

Introduction

The society in which we live is currently divided into evil and good, wrong and right. The distinction of these two circumstances is always not self-evident and cannot be taken lightly. Several views have been imposed in regards to the stand of the legality of abortion. The main legal question that has been place forth is whether it should be legal to have an abortion and the moral question that has been considered is whether it is morally permissible to have an abortion. The question on the legality of the abortion tends to bring a point of dilemma more so in a situation where the life of the mother or the child is a stake. Therefore a moral consideration should be considered when handling the abortion in respective tom whether it can be morally permissible or legal at all. The American liberal position is highly inspired by the position of the legal status in regards to abortion by the United States. The liberal view argues that it is morally permissible to have an abortion early enough during the period of pregnancy but continues that it is not morally permissible to have a late abortion. This liberal point of argument has been greatly condemned by various legal. The governmental and religious body that consider any form of abortion to be immoral and should not be accepted in any way.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

The journal of medical ethics argues from the ethics and morality perspective. According to the study, abortion is wrong since it involves killing or ending a life. after conception, the fetus becomes an individual with rights just like the mother and killing the baby is like murdering because it denies the fetus of its future. The future of the fetus is morally relevant and killing the fetus cannot be justified unless one if sure that the fetus will not develop into a competent adult human being. The fetus has the potential future of value and the self-represented future of value is high. This paper will be used in the literature review section of the paper to examine the morality of abortion from the ethical framework perspective.

Abortion is wrong because it involves celebrity killing of innocent life. The fetus, in this case, is an innocent human being even though it cannot defend itself. The fetus has an inalienable right to live. Every fetus is born into a country which has clear rules and regulation including rights to live to express oneself and freedom of choice, the fetus could be asked about his opinion if it could talk. Abortion involves making choices between the mothers right to live and the fetus right to live which makes abortion wrong by choosing the life of the mother over that of the fetus. This source will be used to write the discussion section of the paper since it offers a critical view of the choices one has before an abortion is procured for the juristic and medical perspective

Abortion is dangerous from the legal perspective since it puts the life of the mother and the unborn child at risk. In this paper, the authors argue that from the common law, the civil law as well as the Islamic law, abortion was wrong and was restricted. The methods of having an abortion are unsafe and the laws against abortion made sense for deterrence purposes that were the protect the fatal life as well as that of the mother. The par argues that this notion was misconstrued that the fetal life was given primacy over that of the mother. Abortion is dangerous and the abortionist has killed many women in the process. Laws against abortion are made in the interest of public health. Abortion is considered a sin and a transgression of morality. Therefore, they should be laws to punish and deter those who intend to procedure abortion. Finally, the life of the fetus should be protected and abortion should only be produced in the life of the fetus and that of the mother is at risk. This study will be used in the literature review section to give different legal, and religious perspectives of abortions.

Teenage Pregnancy and Legal Abortion Issues

Various research that has been carried out in regards to the Hispanics teens have recorded many cases of pregnancy than those belonging any of the diverse groups in the United States. Pregnancy in the stage of teenage has of late been considered a national problem in the US Statistics; however, reveal that a greater portion is contributed by the Hispanics aged between 13-19 years. These groups are Americans who descended from Spaniards and Latin Americans. Even though there is a significant number of teen pregnancies across the other ethnic and racial groups in the US, that of Hispanic teens has dramatically increased and has attracted the attention of many. The increase in pregnancy is associated with drug abuse, which tends to reduce their social morals; approximately 54 per cent of Hispanic teens use at least one illicit drug. There is, therefore, the need to investigate the health behaviours associated with Hispanic teen pregnancies and the consequences.

The most considerable health behaviours that are significantly attached to teen pregnancy among the Hispanics are drug and substance abuse. The teenagers mostly use drugs irresponsibly because of peer pressure. Others use various forms of drugs when they feel frustrated (Salas-Wright et al., 2015). The parents also appear to be less concerned with the habit of developing in the children, which implies that they are not against the tendency. This, however, leads to many cases of pregnancy since the children end up in irresponsible sexual behaviours. Consequently, many cases of pregnancies occur among this group in a particular stage.

Prochoice of the Legality and Illegality of Abortion

Several research that has been carried out argued that abortion is never intended to help people escape from responsibility but it is intended to help protect the lives of the mother and ensure that the parent does not give birth to children who they can not take care of. The paper argues that people have negative attitudes towards abortion because the negative attitudes have always been documented from the purposively sampled studies which are biased. The paper also states that attitudes towards abortion vary across the sociodemographic groups. Abortion should be carried out if an only if there are no other alternatives to safe delivery, family poverty and fetal anomaly, should not be the reason for procuring an abortion. This paper will be used in the introduction and the literature review section to discuss the factors that contrite to abortion.

In this article, "ensuring that women have safe abortion" Clack, and Lledo-Weber argued that women have should have a right to determine what is wrong and not wrong when it comes to their bodies and abortion. They should have the power, authority and right to determine whether to have a baritone or not. Instead of forcing women to have babies, they should be free to choose whether to abort or keep the pregnancy based on their evaluation of the future of the child. Some women get pregnant unwillingly through rape or irresponsible sexual behavers and would not like to live with the consequences and memory of the rape. Therefore, they may decide to procedure an abortion. Their choices should be respected. This paper will be used in the introduction section of the paper as it provides a balanced view of the claims of the pro-choice people.

Researchers argue that abortion is safe but the caveat is that safety of abortion is determined by the way it is carried out and by whom. The paper argues that most of the negative perspective about abortion is determined by the number of unsafe abortions carried out by clandestine abortion providers. The untrained providers are the ones that endanger the women lives despite having the best intentions for the mothers. the paper, therefore, supports abortion but warns that it should be done within the confines of the laws of the country and by trained professionals. The high abortion morbidity and mortality is attributed to the carelessness, restrictive abortion laws. Instead, the government should be facilitating health promotion by advising mothers to seek help from professionals that can use surgical techniques safety and prescribe potent drugs. The government should legalize abortion as a prerequisite to making it safe. This paper will be used in the discussion section to tie the research outcomes wait for the claims in the literature review and theoretical underpinnings.

Human Rights, Social Justice and Abortions Legal Permissibility

The Most Realist Branch of Contemporary Ethical Theories in Advancing Human Rights

The branch of the contemporary ethical theories which appears the most realistic in advancing human rights is the normative ethical theory. The provision of the theory is based on examining the aspects of an action which makes it right or wrong, and what makes those involved vicious or virtuous (Adams, 2012). It guides individuals to consider ethics while studying the moral aspects of the properties of whatever action they undertake. This is therefore important in understanding and balancing between what is ethical and what one thinks define his or her right.

The Concept of Social Justice

Social justice, on Christian social worker perspective, appears not t exist in a practical setting. This is because trying to focus on meeting the demands of social, one looses focus on the ethical and morals constraints which should guide one's activities. On this note, the concept of social justice is rather an abstract which has never been practically applied adequately. Making this a practical concept requires that a clinical social worker understand and be willing to apply the different perspectives of human rights and incorporate in aspects of social justice.

The future of social justice does not promise any aspect of success for clinical social workers. This is because, as much as human beings are entitled to their rights, ethical dilemmas tend to control the extent to which these rights are practised. It, therefore, follows that the concept of social justice will possibly remain as an abstract aspect of reasoning, and may be seen as a practical application in society.

Envisioning Social Justice

To ensure that I promote human rights and social justice, I will first be able to recognize the perspectives of my clients even if they are against my values. I will, therefore, refer them to the perspectives as required by the Christian moral values. According to Wolfer and Brandsen (2015), these two distinct behaviours will enable me to handle a client properly concerning the need to take care of both ethics and rights. I will work towards achieving this by making them feel that their ways of life are not rejected.

The Relationship Between the Person-In-Environment Perspective and Social Justice and the Relational Approach

The person-in-environment tends to improve the lives of the client and society by considering how they relate. This is closely related to social justice and the relational approach which focuses on fairness and the feelings towards oneself. The latter approach is better since it can be used to engage clients to think over their thoughts. It can assist in convincing the client that abortion is not morally permissible under whatever circumstance unless it's a situation where life must be lost and one of the two either the foetus or the parent can be saved.

References

Ostrach, B. (2016). This tangled web of reproductive morbidity risk: Abortion stigma, safety & legality. Frontiers in Women's Health, 1(2).

Patel, T. (2018). Experiencing abortion rights in India through issues of autonomy and legality: A few controversies. Gl...