Inequalities in Health: Marmot's Health in an Unequal World - Essay Sample

Introduction

Marmot Michael covered inequalities in health in his article titled "Health in an unequal world" that was published by The Lancet on December 9, 2006. The central theme of the article was identifying and relating the high rates of mortality rates due to inequality in health in developed, developing, and third-world nations. Majorly, Marmot (2006), strived to find the answer to the relationship between inequality in well-being and inequality. To attain and promote the study, Marmot applied a theoretical structure that analyzed differences in health within various communities. This approach relied on Whitehall's survey of the public servants in Britain. The structure was applied to nations according to their socioeconomic status.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

The purpose of Marmot's paper was to establish a common ground/reason as to why regardless of a nations' socioeconomic status, the mortality rates have unnecessarily increased. Moreover, the paper's second objective was to deduce or come to a solution that can health sector manage and control the mortality rates in these communities. Nonetheless, the article established several impacts. First, it assisted me in understanding the connection between economic, social, and cultural health determinants; thus, increasing my empathy levels. Additionally, the article assisted in improving my general knowledge concerning minority groups/individuals from low socioeconomic status, minimized my stress rates and enhanced my thing and communication skill while talking or handling sensitive topics and information.

Several ideas stood out. First, the inequality in health is not only experienced by third-world nations and towns 'Nairobi,' but it is also experienced in developed countries. The critical point is that inequality in health is a global social and health issue that affects millions of people from low socioeconomic communities. The other idea was on the fact that racial discrimination is the essential health and mental health problem affecting the small socioeconomic societies in developed nations while in growing communities, the main disparity is financial capabilities. In other terms, in developed nations, inequality in health is highly associated with race while it is related to financial skills in third-world countries. Next, Marmot (2006), stated that disparities in health are not predestined. The context is a fact since some nations have improved their health sectors rapidly, while others have not. In other terms, the inequalities in health can only be changed if it is assumed as a dependent variable that can be altered once it is understood; therefore, creating an opportunity to minimize it (Marmot, 2006).

Marmot (2006), needed to cover macro and micro-approach interactions of inequality. By doing so, then the paper would have precise control of relating inequality in health and inequality within. A perfect approach was to analyze disparities in two levels, macro, and micro. In simple terms, macro-analysis highlights inequality as the product of the traditional and modern and practices that are planted within a social system that minimizes access to financial, political, and social resources. On the contrary, micro-analysis states that daily inequalities define the unjust actions perceived and imposed through everyday activities. It is more of a routine structure that covers the intentional and un-intentional happening in interpersonal relationships. In other terms, these two analysis highlights inequality in health is as a result of forced structural and institutional difference (macro-analysis) and everyday discrimination (micro-analysis). To conclude, these two approaches would have a better chance of attaining the research goals and objectives.

Reference

Marmot, M. (2006). Health in an unequal world. The Lancet, 368(9552), 2081-2094