Euthanasia Responses Example

Response one from question one

Yes, I do agree that we don't have the moral obligation to help assist someone to die but bears sole responsibility to support the ailing patient. According to young, the assistance given to the sick patients is not to kill them but to extend the moral values to them by helping them out of that situation. Notably, the autonomy as a principle is relevant only in the case where the patient is in critical and absolute pain. Alternatively, because many people value life over death, it is imperative to note that the beneficence approach will mostly be employed to save the life in the critical conditions.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Response two from question one

Yes, id I don't agree that to benefit a patient with the incurable disease is to kill them but instead adopt young's argument to respect the decision of the patient under all circumstances.The concept of Paternalism provides the legal obligation to respect the decision of the suffering patients to help make them regain the understanding and absolute hope to nourish their hearts and give them a sense of living again. The ailing patients deserve total respect and tender care and only under certain conditions in the autonomy or the reference applied.

Response one from question two

Yes, I do agree with Showman by rejecting the aspect of legalizing active euthanasia from the scope of the slippery problems. The active Voluntary Euthanasia as a present-day reality rather than a problem like in case of the Hemlock Society which defends euthanasia. Notably, he actively rejected the legalization of the euthanasia based on some issues. The inaccuracy in branding the patient with the terminal illness is highly disputed and unrecognized. When the indicated time surpasses the six months arbitrary which seem hard to affect But instead, adopt the non-terminal condition son some diseases. Young perceive that the cases of Euthanasia and its demand on the rise accompanied by problems which can either lead to the end or extension of life. The caregivers are the key drivers and have the mandate help the ailing patients with the perfect car that they need in the society. The moral values form the fundamental guiding principle to help the individual to recover from suicide or help them shy from the act. This physical decrepitude and prolonged pain, subject the patient to appoint they feel life is no longer better than death. At this critical condition, according to young, the autonomy principle applies as long as the person is of sounds state of mind.

Response two from question two

Yes, I agree, it is entirely wrong to allow the ailing patients to do whatever they want with their lives. Notably, the magnitude of the suffering the patient's experiences often pushes the sick patients to willingly request for euthanasia which according to the biblical context is not warranted. From the biblical perspective, the idea of suicide is a response to the breakdown of faith. The Bible attests that in the midst of pain and suffering, self-confidence and hope upon the lord often disappear. The agony of distress and suffering caused by horrible pain and terminal suffering may render the ailing patient to choose death over life. On the other hand, there are certain obligations and circumstances where one may opt to die. According to young, it is imperative to note that the responsibility of every individual is to depict the moral values and primarily help the suicidal person gain the meaningful sense of human existence.

Works cited

Shewmon, D. Alan. "Active voluntary euthanasia: a needless Pandora's box." Issues L. & Med. 3 (1987): 219.

Young, Ernle WD. "Assisting suicide: An ethical perspective." Issues L. & Med. 3 (1987): 281.