Essay Example on Palin's Argument on Healthcare Rationing: Impact on US Citizens

Medical care primarily focuses on humanity, specifically the dignity of persons, thereby necessitating utmost priority on healthcare concerns. Healthcare discussions are open to everyone with all the citizens of America having the liberty to air their opinions and feelings on critical areas in healthcare, as well as providing fundamental bids. Palin, being an American, has similar rights and freedom. Palin’s argument concerning the healthcare rationing, where she states that the move will be detrimental to the people of America and society in general is correct. I concur entirely with her stance on this issue. Despite the justifiable nature of Palin’s argument, I will have to take a different position with her on this as she lacks a foundational basis for the case, not mentioning the fact that her opinion does not align with either that of a democrat or the president. Thus, I cannot entirely agree with her on ethical and legal basis. Additionally, my personal opinion is that Palin’s reactions seem more of irrational judgment and decisions in opposition to the Obama administration’s plans dealing with the promotion of comparative research. According to Aslakson (2016), Palin associates comparative research with patients analysis, which is a total misinterpretation of the concept. The primary aim of comparative research is the establishment of supporting facts for the success and effectiveness of certain medical treatment and diagnosis compared to other people.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Palin’s debatable argument is a black-and-white lie. It speaks of the opposite of the healthcare bill, which advocates for the allocation of additional funds that will enhance doctor’s engagements with patients to deliberate medical-related issues. It focuses on critical elements such as the living will and end of life concern. With this in mind, I direct my verdict for the case towards healthcare service provision contrary to the politics and party devotion. The health reform bill's proposals back comparative research in the creation and enhancing efficacy in the healthcare scheme (Aslakson, 2016). In addition to that, the suggestions have an ultimate objective of improving care results through the identification of the tactics in which disorders, ailments, and other health-related concerns will have efficient extenuation, analyzed, and clinical palliative care (Aslakson, 2016). Thus, nurses have the duty of approving care reforms that show the capacity to positive reforms in the healthcare background, as well as ratifying the faulty legislature. The health is paramount and hanging on the balance, which means that they need noteworthy importance. Any legislative actions that are damaging to public health advancement have to be overlooked as they threaten the attainment of quality healthcare, as evident in the current attempted American Health Care Act.

Reference

Aslakson, R. A. (2016). Beyond "Rationing" and "Death panels." Critical Care Medicine, 44(8), 1605-1606. Doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0000000000001753