1: Introduction
According to D'Hooghe 2017, there are several assumptions and biases eligible to be made concerning drug manufacturers. The significant assumptions made by the drug manufacturers is that they perceive that their products are the best and leading in the market than their competitors' (D'Hooghe, 2017). The assumption relies on the fact that research is conducted to make the drugs better. The study is always authorized by the company's executives, and it also encompasses ways to promote the drug after manufacturing. All this is done when a group eligible to accomplish the task is selected. Different statistics are run, and unnecessary decollations to the medicines are made to ensure the drug looks better lest further exploitation is made (D'Hooghe, 2017).
2: What biases, if any, emerge from those assumptions, and how do those biases show themselves in the source?
Consumers fail to understand that using some drugs can result in adverse effects. According to D'Hooghe, consumers believe that the research made concerning the drugs is sufficient. They end up using drugs, which in some cases, lead to fatal effects. Bias is depicted through statistics where 7.5% of people having minor symptoms end up developing severe symptoms due to taking drugs while believing they would feel better (D'Hooghe, 2017).
3: What biases or assumptions, if any, does the source challenge?
According to D'Hooghe, drug industries can make far better drugs without looking at ways of dominating the market (D'Hooghe, 2017). It is because they would be putting many people in danger by always competing who makes better products.
4: What assumptions and/or biases did YOU have when evaluating the source?
When evaluating what D'Hooghe illustrated, I assumed that the survivability of the drug manufacturing industries depends solely on dollars spent on medications and the influence of drug makers. Another bias exists when people conducting medical trials on the drugs use their employees for tests (D'Hooghe, 2017).
5: How did the source work to either support or challenge your biases, assumptions, or background knowledge?
Based on employees being used for trials for the drugs, D'Hooghe, described how such companies are supposed to be charged fines or even closed down as compensation of people affected. Drug companies that are focused on looting dollars, which are supposed to be for medications, are supposed to be banned (D'Hooghe, 2017). Drugs are supposed to help people and not hurting them.
Reference
D'Hooghe, T. (2017). Transparent collaboration between industry and academia can serve unmet patient need and contribute to reproductive public health. Human Reproduction, 32(8), 1549-1555. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dex230
Cite this page
Essay Example on Assumptions & Biases of Drug Manufacturers: Investigating D'Hooghe's 2017 Study. (2023, Sep 10). Retrieved from https://proessays.net/essays/essay-example-on-assumptions-biases-of-drug-manufacturers-investigating-dhooghes-2017-study
If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the ProEssays website, please click below to request its removal:
- The Testing of Products on Animals - Paper Example
- Essay Sample on Police Brutality in the US: Increased Public Scrutiny and Confusion
- Essay Sample on Caring For Vulnerable Kids: Enhancing Lives in Hospital Settings
- Essay Example on UN Women: Advancing Gender Equality, Women's Rights Globally
- Utilitarianism on Animal Rights - Essay Sample
- Essay Example on US vs Canada: Comparing Healthcare Systems
- Biography Sample on Jane Addams: Champion of Peace, Philanthropy, Work Ethic