Critical Thinking: WMD Report

Introduction

Critical thinking is an essential aspect in decision making and defines all the rationales which are necessary for creating a concrete outcome. In the Weapon for Mass Destruction in Iraq reports, incidences of lack of critical thinking laminated. For instance, giving the DNI powers then backing him up to match his responsibilities shows that the new intelligence law in the DNI will be responsible for integrating independent intelligence community members. The process is passive because DNI relies on legal authorities as compared to programs, budget, and other related priorities. As a result, the provision of such leadership to the components of intelligence is jarred complications exposing DNI to old versions of backing up to strengthen its department.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Failed System

Critical thinking requires concrete and stable systems that cover large areas of focus and can address all the available within a social setting. Critical thinkers must ensure that their systems are durable and are capable of addressing all issues that are within their disposal. In the WMD in Iraq, bringing the FBI into the intelligence community was the leading cause of most failures in the intelligence system (Silberman & Robb, 2014). The FBI is regarded as the most independent and proudest United States Government agency, which is profound in intelligence installation. However, the inclusion of the body is restrictive and only depends on intelligence capabilities.

Similarly, the demand for more intelligence communities hindered the success of policymakers. This is a sign of discomfort and is associated with collection agencies that must come together to address critical issues which validate their credibility. Lack of comprehensive intelligent policies and assessment exposes the system to failed information dispensation process on critical topics, thereby rendering the entire process meaningless. Politicizing the intelligence process hindered the process of getting the best from the intelligence community resulting in redundancy in the system. However, in attempts to rectify the situation, the process lopped making it hard to address meaningful concepts of the intelligence department.

Anticipated Actions

Actions are vital in addressing various issues at a person's disposal. Critical thinkers explore multiple action plans and use them to solve various incidences in their areas of operation. In the WNM in Iraq, actions were entirely castigated to address war cases. The Intelligence community failed to amicable determine the cause of the wars before exploring action plans. Similarly, the entire communication system in the Intelligence Community was based on ways of addressing past incidences rather than assessing the difficulties which are associated with the system. Inaccurate Assumption

Assumptions derail processes in systems as well as hinder their success. In the WMD report, various assumptions that were made about the war and its effects complicated the DNI system (Silberman & Robb, 2014). The official weighing of the British system was associated with various incidences, which not only lowered the credibility of the initiated channel but also rendered the whole process passive. Inaccurate assumptions about the roles of the Intelligence Community also reduce the likelihood of their operations, leading to inconsistent agreement in addressing other issues.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the WMD in Iraq report shows that the failure of intelligence did not start with the incurred faulty analysis. The report indicates that the lack of outstanding critical thinking was the cause of most failures. The knowledge could not adversely collect the intended information for a credible way of addressing their issues. Overall, critical thinking is vital in solving problems that are related to self.

Reference

Silberman, L. H., & Robb, C. S. (2014). The United States. Commission on the Intelligence Capabilities of the United States Regarding Weapons of Mass Destruction. Commission on the intelligence capabilities of the united states regarding weapons of mass destruction. The Commission.