Critical Essay on Advocating for Student Rights in Conform

Introduction

Glenn Beck, in the book "Conform: Exposing the Truth about Common Core and Public Education," is more of Hamiltonian federalist. Beck believes to have a central government which should focus on the student right to access education instead of their unions and adult employees (Beck, 2014). The author urges every classroom to be filled by an outstanding teacher. Beck also advocates that families should be given access to an outstanding classroom. However, the concern of Beck is that "contralists" controls the people in different aspects such as government bureaucracies, teacher colleges, state legislature, and school of boards.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Cobbs et al. (2011) argue that Hamilton wanted a transformed United States into a manufacturing giant such as Great Britain. With his slogan "a Hercules in the cradle," Hamilton was always suspicious with people. Hamilton considered these people as "turbulent and changing." He dreamed of a government of growing stronger in getting favor from the financial elite (Cobbs et al., 2011). Hamiltonians believe in the spirit of enterprise, which must be prolific and useful to extract and expand in proportion the simplicity and various productions and occupation.

Similarly, Glen Beck believes that educated students can contribute to a strong government. Beck argues that "controllist" approach to education is weak by allowing the choice to reign. The "controllist" has interfered with the common core of the national learning standards leading to conformity among schools (Beck, 2014). In the spirit of having a useful and prolific education system, Becks admits that even conservatives are urging the nation to fix its education system by allowing every school to use the same method, same concept, and same time. Becks believes in the concept of the country being viable to manufacture giant because he posits that slaves in America were illiterate and uneducated based on strong opposition from their masters.

Reflection on 19th-Century Society and 21-Century

The anti-federal cartoon, 1793 "A Peep into Antifederal Club" by the Granger Collection, NY, featured Jeffersonian anti-federalists to be a concert with evil and the unruly mob that opposes the government. The image captioned Jefferson was standing and speaking on the table displayed at the center-right (Cobbs et al., 2011). Jefferson argues that federalist is precisely Democratic-Republicans who are rude, arrogant, and secretive.

Becks in the book, argues that people's power shall be achieved through a common goal with an ending focus on a simple and effective strategy. For that reason, in the 21 century, the Jefferson approach is a useful tool for people to use their votes and elect state officials and school board members who listen to the opinion, suggestions, and grievances of the public.

For instance, in the 21 century, the politician steals public money and resources and still seek for votes. If the taxpayer asks them to fix schools, they boast and think the public is bluffing. Becks seeks the change that people wants and the change must be inevitable.

Becks insist that the time has come where the public should form their union. There is a need to form a group taxpayer and concerned parents who believe in change and are tired of the familiar tactics used by the state official and the school boards. Becks asserts that teachers' union officials act as political animals (Beck, 2014). The current teachers are being brainwashed by conservatives' politicians who slash their pay. Even though most of the conservative politicians believe that teachers should be paying more, they still attack the antiquated concept.

Description of 21st-Century Society

The Federalist, Alexander Hamilton, envisions a developed American economy, 1972. Hamilton dreamed of a manufacturing establishment that contributes effectively in giving products and revenue to the society. Hamilton dreamed of the division of labor. According to him, the labor needed in the economy was scared. Occupational separations make the work to be realized in greater perfection than when they are blended. Hamilton believed that division of labor creates three circumstances, namely an extended use of machinery, the economy of time, and greater skills and dexterity (Cobbs et al., 2011). Hamiltonians believe that people who have single objects gain more power and are more likely to apply a natural imagination in utilizing the approach to abrige and facilitate labor. By using machinery, it is more likely to realize mass production.

Similarly, Becks also dreams of the division of labor that leads to a better contribution to society. Becks argue that for the establishment of schools to be good, public relation should be enhanced. There is a need for the school board members, administrators, and union leaders to determine how to provide accurate information.

Becks argues that in school districts across the United States, a teacher is usually given an automatic and annual salary based on the number of graduate classes completed and the year of service. In spite of their demand for pay raised by union officials and school administrators, the public cannot get improved performance (Beck, 2014). Becks posits that the notion that the United States does not fund education is false. Becks claims that funding the school is not a problem. Becks believes that there are issues that hold the country back.

On the issue of division of labor, the Union leaders in the current society fuel the notion that all leaders are equal and deserve to be treated and pay in the same way. However, that does not happen in the 21st century. In essence, some teachers are more productive than other teachers in helping the student to study. Even though there are disparities in teaching, the union and the school policies do not recognize and reward them based on their quality and performance. From here, the concepts and the ideology of Hamilton holds.

Evaluation of 21st-Century Society

I concur with the idea of the choice of living in the 21st century. Such that, the people have the right to choose where to live, the number of kids to have, the career to pursue, car to own, and a place to eat. The constitution provides that individuals are free to participate in a free-market economy. For that reason, consumer power is built and established on a firm foundation. However, when it comes to education, the government has monopolized it. Implying that competition among various schools is limited leading to pressure for the school to improve. Instead of the union leaders, school support staff, teachers, and administrators to help the students and their parents, they continue to frustrate them. The government forces children from average income earning families to attend local public schools whose fees are raised.

I agree with Becks that in the 21st century, the people the public pay to do management and staffing should well-trained and have a lot of skills. Ideally, in contemporary society, people are ignorant about who is elected or recruited in a position as long as they stay in the budget (Beck, 2014). People want teachers who follow the curriculum and can produce the desired outcome. Today, people want a profitable education system. A program that takes people money from public schools is against better judgment.

Cobbs et al., (2011) argues that the interest of a nation is to diversify the pursuit of industrious people who compose them. Cobbs belabor that manufactures establishment is calculated on productive labor. However, in the contemporary world, the "profit" idea seems very selfish to most of the people. People believe that business docket is unjust and corrupt. Cobbs (2011) asserts that the US constitution punishes any counterfeiting issues dealing with the coin in the United States (Cobbs et al., 2011). Hamiltonians believe that the ever-rising competition vision of national development shall divide American society as the American puzzles over the future of a young nation.

Conclusion

In my view, education is the only way Americans can realize the American dream (Cobbs et al., 2011). People who are against education making a profit believe that public education should dwell on higher moral planes where every educator's first concern is teaching and does not engage in filthy capitalists. Ideally, the people who are against the public making profit are trying to complicate the situations. In the first place, the school charter does not include such things as "for profit." In essence, a charter school is a non-profit governed and appointed by the school boards. In a charter school, the school board can hire for-profit companies to manage and staff their facilities based on the trust and belief that the companies can do a better job of utilizing available resources to help their kids to succeed.

References

Beck, G. (2014). Conform: Exposing the Truth About Common Core and Public Education. Simon & Schuster.

Cobbs, E., Blum, E. J., & Gjerde, J. (2011). Major Problems in American History. Cengage Learning.