Annotated Biliography on History & Philosophy of Psychology

Chung, M. C., & Hyland, M. E. (2012). History and philosophy of psychology. Wiley. ISBN-13: 978-1405179461

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

The book provides a comprehensive discussion on the belief that there is a direct relationship between the body and the mind and philosophy and science. Psychology depicts that there is a single link between the human nervous system and thoughts. As a result, the interconnection between the mind and body makes them work like a machine. The book examines the perspective that psychology falls is a discipline in the field of science and how they fit each other. The author assesses various theoretical backgrounds to demonstrates the association between the body and mind and science and philosophy. The book is fundamental in this discussion because the author examines multiple theoretical knowledge that reflects the association between science and philosophy. In this respect, the author evaluates the theory of atomism that explains the evolution of science, materialist theory, which explains the nature and function of the human, and dualism concept showcasing the interdependence of the mind and body.

Laplane, L., Mantovani, P., Adolphs, R., Chang, H., Mantovani, A., McFall-Ngai, M., ... & Pradeu, T. (2019). Opinion: Why science needs philosophy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(10), 3948-3952

The article provides a discussion of the interconnection between psychology and science. Scholars in psychology posit that there is a historical connectedness between science and philosophy. However, modern scientists are of a contrary opinion that each discipline is stand alone. The article examines three examples taken from the life science which the author employs to highlight the contribution of philosophy in the development of science. There are four areas used by the author to demonstrates science and philosophy do not survive in isolation. The four regions are scientific concepts clarification, evaluation of the scientific methods and assumptions, development of new theories and concepts, and standing in the middle between the society a science. In this regard, the article is fundamental to this discussion because it provides relevant information on how philosophy influences cognitive science. The article indicates that the relationship between science and philosophy unfolds in the form of shared conceptual analysis, logic, and strict argumentation.

Thagard, P. (2009). Why cognitive science needs philosophy and vice versa. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(2), 237-254

The article gives the necessary information to add to this report. The article posits that philosophy contributes to cognitive science in two ways: normativity and generality (Thagard, 2009). The author of this article aims to assess the critical role of philosophy in the mind's extensive research. The generality perspective of philosophy tends to respond to general questions concerning cognitive science, while the normative side of philosophy deals with how things should be and their current state. The author provides several examples of how philosophy responds to general questions arising from the scientific study of thoughts. Therefore, enhancing the understanding of the association between cognitive science and philosophy. The article highlight that philosophical ideas are critical in prompting scientific studies (Thagard, 2009). As such, cognitive science plays a primary role in assisting philosophy in developing normative and general theories on reality, meaning, morality, and knowledge.

Abdulle, J. H. (2019). The Nexus Between Philosophy and Science: The Import of Philosophy of Science to Science and Philosophy Itself. International Journal of Philosophy, 7(3), 107

The article tries to demonstrate that philosophy does not thrive in a vacuum. Instead, the philosophy of science is the primary foundation of the empirical attestation of humans (Abdulie, 2019). Historically, the similarity of metaphysics, epistemology, and theories intertwine both science and philosophy. On the one hand, the article indicates that science creates an avenue for philosophy to practically test concepts and methods. On the other hand, philosophy indirectly contributes to the development of the scientific concepts and theories employed in the world today. The article highlights logical positivist as one of the philosophical concepts impacting the development of science. This concept embraces scientific ideas and knowledge and disrespects traditional discussions in philosophy. Logical positivists acknowledge scientific theories as the actual knowledge involving rational analysis and formulation of facts. In other words, logical positivists rubbish philosophical metaphysics matters and tend to transform it into scientific concepts. This article is critical in providing a meaningful background about the history of western psychology.

De Haro Ollé, S. (2019). Science and Philosophy: A Love-Hate Relationship. Foundations of Science (2020) 25:297–314 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-019-09619-2

The article approaches the topic in two different ways. Firstly, the discussion is about why science does not require philosophy. Secondly, the report looks into why philosophy is vital to science. Some scientists claim that philosophy died a long time ago because it did not catch up with the advancement of science (De Haro, 2019). The second argument in the article is the essence of philosophy is the development of science. One of the crucial duties of philosophy is the assessment of presumptions and concepts. Arguably, the analytical function of philosophy in the examination of scientific assumptions and ideas is the beginning of contemplation of nature.

Reference

Abdulle, J. H. (2019). The Nexus Between Philosophy and Science: The Import of Philosophy of Science to Science and Philosophy Itself. International Journal of Philosophy, 7(3), 107. Available at: http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/journal/paperinfo?journalid=204&doi=10.11648/j.ijp.20190703.11

Chung, M. C., & Hyland, M. E. (2012). History and philosophy of psychology. Wiley. ISBN-13: 978-1405179461

De Haro Ollé, S. (2019). Science and Philosophy: A Love-Hate Relationship. Foundations of Science (2020) 25:297–314 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-019-09619-2

Laplane, L., Mantovani, P., Adolphs, R., Chang, H., Mantovani, A., McFall-Ngai, M., ... & Pradeu, T. (2019). Opinion: Why science needs philosophy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(10), 3948-3952. Available at: https://www.pnas.org/content/116/10/3948

Thagard, P. (2009). Why cognitive science needs philosophy and vice versa. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(2), 237-254. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01016.x