Why the Statement "All Lives Matter" is Problematic to "Black Lives Matter" Essay

Black Lives Matter (BLM) is a global avant-garde movement, stemming from the African American peoples, which crusade against total racism and violence directed to African American individuals in the country. All lives matter (#AllLivesMatter) on the other hand refers to a slogan that has come to be linked with disapproval of the Black Lives Matter movement. The supporters of #AllLivesMatter make use of the tagline as part of a campaign that the Black Lives Matter campaign fails to put into consideration the fact that other races residing in the United States, inclusive of but never limited to law enforcement officers who also die because of violence. The problem with "All Lives Matter" is that it negates the main message of "Black Lives Matter"; it looks to get even as opposed to finding logic.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

It is appalling why so many folks are infuriated by the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement. If we were to go straight to the point, it is funny why even white people that were traditionally supportive and sympathetic to the civil rights movement and the banning of the Jim Crow Laws are enraged by the Black Lives Matter. The main bone of contention between the particular (Black Lives Matter) and the universal (All Lives Matter) is what critic has placed an emphasis on (Damani 76). They claim that the activists affiliated to the Black Lives Matter movement see to it that their phrasing is reviewed; they want everyone to accept that all lives should matter and are very much convinced that semantics are never subtle in any instance.

Good willed people that understand the balance between liberalism and nationalism are very sceptical that the statement "Black Lives Matter" is intended to imply that other lives do not. Black Lives Matter could be understood as a single of a series of the same declarations. Every ethnic group, by all means, are convinced that its members are important. All the same intent and whatever it is that is put into implication is also of relevance. A careful look at this matter will reveal a reversal i.e. normally it is non-blacks that resist questions on inferences and intent regarding coded meanings.

Another interpretation can also be put into consideration with respect to the "Black Lives Matter" and the "All Lives Matter". The challenge associated with Black Lives Matter is not that it gives reference to African Americans as a people, whether to the segregation of other peoples. It is, as an alternative, which Black Lives Matter points out our collective failure to live up to our archetypes and the ever presence of racial discrimination. Individuals of all backgrounds are enraged more by finding out that they are pretenders than they are by a direct test on their principles (Pashia 34).

The "All Lives Matter" movement fails to read that "Black Lives Matter" resonates with another distinction, the disparity between normative and descriptive. The statements and the former category describe this world as it is. The latter set imagines the human society at it ought to be. The failure of the #AllLivesMatter to distinguish the principles of the "Black Lives Matter" is the source of a lot of confusion, in academic research, general conversation, and political debacle.

If the proponents of All Lives Matter were to be reasonable, they would realize that "Black Lives Matter" as setting forth two differentiated but interrelated sentiments. The initial one is normative and universal: all lives matter and is important; and the diverse democracy of the United States (without a doubt, any civilization deserving of the designation) accepts that as perfect (Hammor 55). The second is descriptive and particular: the treatment of African American people, as demonstrated by overwhelming statistics and individual cases, shows, in fact, they preserved as less than equal.

All Lives Matter is problematic to Black Lives Matter because it does not understand that African Americans are angry about the killings. In addition to that, the white proponents of "All Lives Matter" are not aware that they are angry because they are forced to come to terms with the situation. Framed in the above manner, the feeling between white people and black people are related in terms of origin but are never the same at all. For those that are not White or African Americans living in the United States does not offer any privileges in taking about the American dilemma. But it is never a connotation that nonwhites and non-blacks navigate the colour line on a day in day out basis.

Conclusion

More importantly, matters of "AllLivesMatter" and "BlackLivesMatter" revolve around rhetoric. It is obvious that anyone that is considerate of the American constitution should be aware that language can be utilized by #AllLivesMatter and #BlackLivesMatter. The grammar these two factions use, diction and vocabulary are not very literal as it is symbolic, metaphorical, figurative. What is uttered by proponents of both divides is only as relevant as the manner in which it is uttered and by which individual?

Works Cited

Damani, Jessi, "Every Time You Say 'All Lives Matter' You Are Being an AccidentalRacist". Huffington Post. 16 Jul. 2016, www.huffingtonpost.com/jesse-damiani/every-time-you-say-all-li_1_b_11004780.html. Accessed 30 March 2018

Hammor, Randi "All Lives Matter." UWIRE Text, 1 Oct. 2015, p. 1. InfotracNewsstand, http://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/A430465227/STND?u=tel_a_nsti&sid=STND&xid=4585170a. Accessed 3 Apr. 2018

Pashia, Angela. "Black Lives Matter in Information Literacy." University of Pitsberg. Radical Teacher, vol. 106, p.142-143, 2016.http://radicalteacher.library.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/radicalteacher/article/view/305/232. Accessed 3 Apr. 2018.