The Worst Fat in the Food Supply - Public Health Essay Sample

Date:  2021-06-23 01:48:09
3 pages  (629 words)
Back to list
This essay has been submitted by a student.
This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

The current effect of interest entails the adopted human behavior of consuming trans-fatty foods which lead to enhanced chances of dangerous health conditions. In this case, the consumption of foods containing trans-fatty acid and oil is common through the consumption of common food substances such as donuts, margarine, and other packaged foods. The consumption of this foods has been seen to increase the number of cardiovascular disease and heart attack cases within the society. The fact though remains that the foods are sweet and easy to acquire from the bakery and other restaurant prepared foods which mean that the humans have formed a behavior of acquiring this food now and then. Consequently, the American Medical Association and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) boards have banned the oils from the industry-prepared foods.

If this sample essay on"The Worst Fat in the Food Supply - Public Health Essay Sample" doesn’t help,
our writers will!

The event illustrates the fact that the human behavior of consuming trans-fatty foods deteriorates their health greatly where a 2% increase in the trans-fatty oils causes a 29% increase in coronary heart disease risks (Brody, 2017). The vice versa is true in that the banning of consumption and production of industry-foods containing trans-fatty oils significantly reduces the rates of coronary heart disease occurrences within the society (Brandt et al., 2017). As such the Food and Drug Administration wants to ban the consumption and production of this food substances in 2018 (Brody, 2017; Brandt, 2017).

Basing on the given outline of the event of banning the trans-fatty acids containing foods in order to impact a behavioral health change in the society requires the use of the social learning or the social cognitive theory. The theory can be defined as to induce a behavioral health change due to the reciprocal relationships among the personal factors, environment, and attributes of the feeding behavior where the self-efficacy is the major aspect that will determine the behavioral change. In this case, the behavioral health change of whether or not to consume trans-fatty food will be based on the key concepts of reciprocal determination, self-efficacy, outcome expectations, behavioral capability and observational learning (US Department of Health and Human Services, 2002). As such, the researches carried out in New York, Denmark, and other regions which have experimented the effects resulting from the burning of the trans-fatty acids containing foods will provide the learning grounds for the people so that they see the essence of abandoning the food. Abandoning the food will be enhanced by the fact that the FDA will ban the consumption. Additionally, the vast availability of information about the right health behavioral change, such as the consumption of saturated oil foods such as coconut or palm oil rather than the hydrogenated oils such as the olive oil, from the many scientific research by researchers such as Brandt (2017), there are many chances of impacting a health behavioral change among the people in the US and on a global scale.

To sum it all up, the event fueled towards banning the supply of the worst fat food in the US requires that the people be thoroughly informed of the issue. The facts about the health implications that the foods pose on the people are stated and widely researched which means that a cognitive change in behavior will easily impinge in the people.


Brandt, E., J., Myerson, R., Perraillon, M., C., et al. (2017). Hospital Admissions for Myocardial Infraction and Stroke Before and After the Trans-Fatty Acid Restrictions in New York. JAMA Cardiol. Doi:10.1001/jamacardiol.2017.0491

Brody, J., E. (2017). The Worst Fat in the Food Supply. Retrieved 2nd June 2017. From

US Department of Health and Human Services. (2002). Physical Activity Evaluation Handbook. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Appendix3, pg.43. Retrieved 2nd June 2017. From

If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the ProEssays website, please click below to request its removal: