Scientific Rigor: A Value in Nursing for Evidence-Based Thinking - Essay Sample

Introduction

Scientific rigor is one of the major values in nursing that is emphasized in every writing and activity due to the emphasis of evidence-based thinking decisions. Scientific rigor as a value in nursing resiliently points out the importance of applying the scientific method, which is instrumental in preventing bias through its controlled experiments, randomized methodology, and quantitative analysis and interpretation of data, which helps create authentic statements and nursing knowledge that is beyond reproach. Scientific rigor in nursing practice promotes logical arguments, intellectual honesty, the use of probability and statistics, experimental, and the analysis of errors. The scientific rigor approach continues facilitating higher replication in nursing ideas and concepts, which contributes to the notion of evidence-based practice in healthcare and nursing decision making. Scientific rigor value has long been established as the undisputable form and approach of writing reports, journals, case studies, and even nursing theory books due to the potential to replicate concepts or knowledge to the betterment of the nursing interventions.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Black et al. (2015) deal with the approaches to promoting evidence-based practice through research facilitated by the point of care clinicians. The article provides in-depth research on how point of care nurses and other healthcare providers can be able to facilitate evidence-based practice from their experiences. The article by Black et al. (2015) includes a methodology section which is a prerequisite for scientific rigor in nursing research by establishing how the research to establish the value of evidence-based practice in nursing can be replicated and how the conclusions from the research can be trusted as more authentic due to the possession of rigor which is established through the use of statistical analysis to create context and directly link the conclusions to the actual nursing research which has actual participants.

The article by Miyashita et al. (2007) emphasizes the importance of stratified random sampling, which is an instrumental source of authenticity. The stratified random sampling ensures a great representation of the study population, which is an essential source of scientific rigor. The article uses a large study sample and emphasizes that the response rate was 51%, which is an instrumental source of scientific rigor and trust of using the study in understanding the perceptions of the population on deaths associated with cancer, which is instrumental towards evidence-based cancer care decisions. The article by Zugazagoitia et al. (2016), which seeks to establish the challenges of cancer treatment, uses scientific rigor to attain high acceptance as a quality article. The article uses clinical trials as a form of scientific rigor, which is instrumental in promoting more excellent reliability of the information. This shows that data analysis and random sampling in clinical trials play an instrumental role in fostering scientific rigor of the article.

Conclusion

Scientific rigor is an essential element in nursing research that involves the use of statistics, random sampling, and percentages in the presentation of data. Scientific rigor complements the high need for evidence-based decisions in nursing practice. Scientific rigor ensures that nursing decisions can be replicated in further case scenarios, and research contributes to the understanding of the different disease and patient problems more objectively.

Works Cited

Black, Agnes T., et al. "Promoting evidence-based practice through a research training program for point-of-care clinicians." The Journal of nursing administration 45.1 (2015): 14.

Miyashita, M., et al. "Good death in cancer care: a nationwide quantitative study." Annals of Oncology 18.6 (2007): 1090-1097.

Zugazagoitia, Jon, et al. "Current challenges in cancer treatment." Clinical therapeutics 38.7 (2016): 1551-1566.