Research Paper on U.S. Education: A Pathway to Economic and Social Prosperity

In the United States today, education has a significant function in improving the lives of individuals living in different households. It allows people to attain economic and social prosperity and offers numerous public advantages like an amplified base for taxing and more intense engagements in civic environments. Higher salaries, a lower chance of being unemployed and improved health choices have reverberated in the lifetime of the skills and experiences gained from higher education (Ary, 2012). However, research shows that the financial expenditure required is one of the main obstacles to university enrolment, particularly for students from low-income households (Long, 2019). For that reason, in 2008-09, the state and federal administrations invested over $2 trillion in grants and subsidies, like the Pell grants, intending to encourage enrolments (Long, 2019).

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

There are numerous motives to query the effects of the country's present financial aid scheme, although it is believed that financial assistance can significantly increase educational outcomes. In addition to checking for variances in income abilities and academic achievement, noteworthy fissures in education access by household earnings remain after decades of financial aid policy (Paulson, 2010). Graduates of high-income high schools of the high school quartile attended college in the lowest quartile of achievement at a very similar degree as more top income individuals in the same space. Those gaps, which are also concerning race and ethnicity, indicate that there is no equal access to high schools by the aid system. A 2006 study by the Federal Higher Education Commission of the help program confirmed what many critics have been suggesting for the last few years: the financial assistance scheme does not resolve the students' issues (Long, 2019). While the total cost of universities can be reduced significantly by financial aid, numerous scholars have problems prevalent in their access to education.

Also, it is a long, complicated process that is the basis of receipts of financial assistance. As the Commission notes, some students do not go to college because of insufficient information and increased costs and the confusing system of financial aid. Even if the financial support program is flawed, the principle that financial assistance would affect postsecondary student choices was reinforced through years of research. Studies have recognized operative monetary support strategies that advance school enrolment and decision making, and the findings from such research can assist in informing current discussions on how financial assistance systems can be improved (Long, 2019). Bernie Sanders and President Trump present different solutions to the educational budget issue in the United States.

Sen. Bernie Sanders has proposed to make college education free in the U.S. The Vermont representative may launch the most aggressive national higher education program for Democratic 2020. The proposal would make tuition and debt-free for two and four years for public and tribe universities and universities would wipe out the almost 1.6 Trillion dollars of loans presently unsettled by students through Wall Street tax. Currently, some 45 million People are lending students (Golshan, 2019). Their debt, regardless of income and assets, would be cancelled. The difference between this and the free college proposal of Sen. Elizabeth Warren is significant, which also offers wide-ranging loan reprieve strategies, but limits it to families with salaries that are less $250,000 (Golshan, 2019).

The proposal would encourage the U.S. government to abolish student tuition and fees. Sanders supports financing sources to counties, territories, and historically black colleges and institutions. The law aims to increase study and work expenditures and establish grants to low-income students, which could entail additional costs associated with educational activities, from residential and freight to books. It cost $2.2 trillion over a decade, and Sanders says his Wall street tax would be reimbursed. Throughout 2016, Trump tried to introduce a Wall Street speculation tax to collect small charges for the selling of shares, securities and derivatives; most experts estimate that hundreds of trillion dollars could be collected each year (Bartik, Hershbein, & Lachowska, 2016). Sanders ' office has quoted Robert Pollin's progressive economist's forecast that $2.4 trillion of revenue will be made over a decade.

One of Sanders' arguments is free college. It was one of many policies that differentiated Obama from Hillary Clinton, who claimed that the states should not subsidize schooling for the wealthiest Americans during the 2016 presidential years. The vision of Sanders in the Democrat Party, three years later, is ascending. To get funding from the federal authorities, tribes and member states must meet individual necessities: they would necessarily have to assure the education commission that they will retain higher education advances and require they require help in funding. The federal government will pay 95% of the expense of reducing tuition and fees for community colleges with at least 75% lower-level undergraduate enrolment - applicants qualifying for the Pell grant (Golshan, 2019). It cannot go to the salaries of the managers, financial assistance based upon merit.

The proposal is precisely intended for learners with low incomes by increasing the federal Pell Grant program, increasing work-related backing and providing a national dollar-for-dollar match for countries to eliminate additional university costs. Since the state governs U.S. universities, the state is required to purchase in the implementation of universal tuition and non-debt college scheme. Unlike Warren's, Sanders ' plan allows a voluntary convention to be met by different states. "Their universities are left out of calculation if states do not want to get their capital," Nilsen says (Golshan, 2019). Moreover, that will not be a problem for historically black private schools that would like to take part. The Clinton argued that the 2016 administration should not be supporting the college for people who could easily afford it, as another critical factor in universal free college and deficit-relief initiatives.

On the other hand, President Trump proposes to cut the Education Department in billions of dollars and try to eliminate post-school curricula, teacher training and other school needs grants. Nevertheless, the proposed budget will establish a $5billion initiative to help learners acquire private education. The government's demand to cut the budget of the Education Department by about $8.5 billion-roughly 12 per cent-is unlikely to gain in momentum in Congress, when Trump's members have dismissed earlier proposals for a rubbish blow. The proposal faces even higher hurdles with the Democrats controlling the House (Balingit & Douglas-Gabriel, 2019).

The proposal mirrored the push on by the government to reduce the federal government's size and role, said Jim Blew. He agreed, though, that Capitol Hill faced long odds. "We are returning to ask for a decrease because the government believes that the discretionary quantity of backing for the department for education needs to be cut," Blew said. This is because the state around the federal government needs more fiscal discipline and tackles some of the higher government objectives (Balingit & Douglas-Gabriel, 2019). The Treasury Department would operate it and encouraged by federal tax dollars to contribute to scholarship funds.

"This core budget concerns freedom of education- the freedom of Americans to travel their lives in the methods and locations which they preferred," DeVos said in a news release (Balingit & Douglas-Gabriel, 2019). Critics perceive tax credit bursaries as a shortcut path for private schools for taxpayers' dollars. Even those who endorse college choices fear the legislative project is going to lead to more private schools being examined by the administration. Also, Trump's budget proposal was targeted at eliminating popular programs, including funding for post-school activities for kids in poor communities and providing substantial grants to fund classrooms, facilities, counselling and other school needs. It also underpins safety in school activities, like health equipment and mental support, the student support and academic enrichment program. A $2 billion scholarship program for career development teachers is to be eliminated by the government (Balingit & Douglas-Gabriel, 2019). However, it hopes that funding for a grant program would be increased so teachers could get "discounts" and choose their career development.

In the plan, higher education policies include many of the same proposals as prior plans, like the reduction or eradication of some of the aid services in the federal system. Again DeVos intends to reduce public sector employees' debt remuneration and to reduce more than half of the university work-studies budget. These proposals have failed in a Congress run by the Republicans and are even less likely with the Democrats that control the House. The Trump administration pays a premium for vocational training, as in recent years (Balingit & Douglas-Gabriel, 2019). The agency is also looking to expand apprenticeship programs for an additional $60 million.

In revising the technique it controls loans and grants in the federal system, the Education Department is requesting more cash to carry out this revision. For the Next Generation Investment management Climate plan, which is regarded commonly as NextGen, DeVos needs $1.8 billion. According to Blew, that is a rise of $133 million to handle Blew's federal loan portfolio (Balingit & Douglas-Gabriel, 2019). The White House indicated in its budget objectives that it would encourage sharing of risk or' skin in a game,' a concept which would require colleges to pay off when federal education loans default for their students. No arrangement of this manner was mentioned by the department of education, even though Blew said that the debate was underway to draw up a plan. While legislation has been unsuccessful in the past, the concept that learning institutions could have the same credit risk have mixed reactions.

The budget will allow low-income students to enrol in short-term programs, who receive Pell grants. Works that are less than 15 weeks or less than 600 hours of training are generally not approved for grants for university programs. Also, the Trump administration is trying to raise $2 billion from Pell's savings; something advocacy groups claim may undermine the system. It will even for the advantage of loans for undergraduates who presently have 10 per cent of their revenue paid for their loans for 20 years. The proposal fulfils the promise to decrease the time for payment to about 15 years, but it raises monthly payments to 12.5 per cent for those who have received loans as graduates and undergraduates. Nevertheless, lenders with graduate-level mortgages will pay more: 30 years.

Knowing the vital function played by education in the overall growth of people, greater access to universities should be an essential public priority. Despite significant improvements in accessing higher education over the last few decades, however, postsecondary enrollment across the country is still skewed by family revenue, and there is a significant lack of fulfilment among learners, particularly those with lower incomes (Green, 2017). Given this question, it is necessary to review the evidence as to the efficacy of aid programs and why. Aid will help boost student attendance, but several initiatives and methods have accomplished that aim more effectively. The research work on financial suppo...