Paper Example on Survey: Master My Stories & Describe the Gap: Accountability & Overcoming Challenges

The survey that I participated in on the seven topics of discussion, I had several Yes in the following two topics; Master My Stories and Describe the Gap. I have first-hand experience on the two issues, and I have learned from the course how to overcome some of the challenges that I faced personally. The idea of how to deal with disappointment is also an experience I gained from taking the course.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Accountability is a process of making someone steps up to a problem as well as holding other people responsible (Patterson et al., 2013). The idea of being accountable is provided with an example of a firm manager who felt that holding people accountable for what they have done as a way of improving the relationship that exists between them. By holding people responsible for the notion of positive deviance, workers at the plant identified skills that could be used to make people feel responsible for becoming accountable. Many people tend to ignore the written skills after reading them, while others tend to practice those skills.

It is essential to understand that we must first work on ourselves on the idea of accountability before holding that particular discussion with others ( Patterson et al., 2013). Holding ourselves accountable for any action in our lives helps us understand that every fact, stories, or emotions that we may display when trying to convince another person to take the responsibility for their action. Help us see people as a person and not a villain. This idea is discussed in chapter one of the course( Patterson et al., 2013). For example, in the survey, the topic describes the gap pinpoint some of the weaknesses an individual encounters when he or she takes part in a crucial accountability process. The subject enables an individual to understand what he or she should do to overcome the challenges without fear of losing friends or making a person feel inferior. As an individual, the topic of what and if also gives me an idea that I can do things differently and still succeed. The knowledge from this chapter gives me the idea that I can choose from various options as an individual.

The provided options enable me to confront the right problem without looking at ways I may overlook the issue at hand. Some of the right tools to use to get into a conversation when faced with a problem include: Thinking CPR, the acronym helps by giving me direction to an accountability discussion as well as avoiding the negative result views I might encounter when trying to solve a problem. Another tool is stating clearly the intentions so that I can understand how I will benefit once the problem is solved. Prioritization is another tool I use when stepping up to the consequences of the problem. For instance, I am in a position to understand what thins I should do and those that I am not supposed to do.

The topic describes a gap; it has enabled me to understand that even though I have a weakness, there are times that I can weigh between options before making the final decision. It is made easy when using the term if (Rudman, 1997). This word makes me have a second thought in whatever action I intend to take like if I do this, the result will be this. When faced with a problem, I consider where I should speak so that there might not be an argument whether I am correct. It is because I will be acting out of my concerns. It enables me to decide whether I should speak or remain silent on specific topics to avoid a misunderstanding (Greiling & Spraul, 2010).

To summarize, once I have decided to hold others accountable, I make sure that I am in the right frame of mind. Achieving this is through working on myself first. According to the course, this is made easy when others once disappointed an individual. There is a possibility of one taking his or her time before accusing another person. It helps one hen trying to asking a person to be accountable for what they have done. It can obe achieved if an individual knows what is happening or what caused the current problem. It results in a healthy discussion.

The second chapter of master my story helped me understand that there is a need for me to be in the right mood before making others accountable for their actions (Patterson et al., 2013). In the course, this topic enabled me an individual to learn that when faced with a problem, my behavior during the first few seconds when communicating sets the tone for everything. Whether the person will be honest with me, when conducting a discussion, I must understand that whatever I will say in the first few seconds of conversation will establish the climate of that particular topic of discussion. It may seem a problem if we tell ugly stories to relate the discussed situation with real-life experience. The unpleasant stories may make the person you intended to be accountable to feel like there is no need for doing so.

When, as an individual, I jump to conclusions or make assumptions without having prior knowledge of what made an individual do whatever he or she did. Then making the wrongdoer feel accountable will be a challenge since the person will feel like I am better than him or her; that is why I judged his action (Greiling, & Spraul, 2010). Mastering my story helps me to understand why there is that particular problem using the concept of attribution studies. Scholars did this specific research to make people understand why people engage in socially unacceptable behaviors such as stealing and fighting. This concept helps me as an individual to ask myself questions like why did he or she steal. The question asked gives me different ideas like because he wanted money, among other reasons (Rudman, 1997). The concept of mastering my story discussed in chapter two in the course enables me to understand that there are several reasons why people do bad things, and I have no right to decide whether a person is terrible before knowing the root cause of that particular problem or issue.

During accountability discussions, those found guilty tend to blame others for the course of their problem. As an individual, there are ways in which I can converse with the person who is in trouble until he or she decides to be accountable for whatever he has done. For instance, I can choose to keep quiet so that the victim can feel that I am interested in whatever he or she wants to say. Through silence, the person may decide to talk about what is in his mind or walk away without finding a solution to that particular problem. Some people may explain why doing whatever they did is because they failed to deal with the problem when it first occurred. Others also opt to violence as a way of solving the problem they are facing.

The best solution for accountability in the concept of mastering my story is telling the rest of the story on a fairground without blaming others for the mistake done. When a person tells his or her story, as an individual, I will understand that there is a need to have different views of the problem before convincing a person to be accountable for that particular mistake. A question like what caused a person to do that enables me to develop a complete view of the person and the circumstances that surround him or her. Instead of looking at what might be wrong with them. It makes me understand the different sources of influences that make individuals cause trouble, such as; personal, structural, and social sources. The private sources include personal motivation and ability, the fundamental sources include structural motivation like money, and the common sources include social motivations like peer pressure.

Conclusion

In conclusion, both the describe gap and mastering my story helps me as an individual to know how I can relate with ease with others to make them accountable for the problems they cause. It also helps me avoid judging people before listening to the whole story and asking questions like, “Why did they do that? These questions help me to have a different point of view on various problems.

References

Greiling, D., & Spraul, K. (2010). Accountability and the challenges of information disclosure. Public Administration Quarterly, 338-377. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/41288352?casa_token=1Iaw_zG1Xu8AAAAA:yp7oQFhM8-ebE27K9p-OJsmOAf0eTlEKslWs7-2ILi6YJyyAfd-IdGl5CumMWqwyXC04AKXhjSeTKI_-0829jCwQejxx4wwPTsInDnUPauWACbrmLx-uRg

Patterson, K., Grenny, J., Maxfield, D., McMillan, R., & Switzler, A. (2013). Crucial accountability. Leadership Excellence, 30(8), 5-6. Retrieved from http://farran.abwe.org/uploads/9/7/1/2/97128822/crucial_accountability_summary.pdf

Rudman, J. (1997). The state of authorship attribution studies: Some problems and solutions. Computers and the Humanities, 31(4), 351-365. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1001018624850