Paper Example on Roe v. Wade: Society's Debate On Abortion

Introduction

The You’re Wrong About podcast presents the case between Roe and Wade on abortion. Society has mixed opinions about abortion. Some people consider abortion as a crime, and that women can only have abortions when their lives are at risk. For instance, in a case where a woman is carrying an ectopic pregnancy, it is vital to induce abortion to save her life, especially during the first trimester. Also, some people may approve abortion only if the pregnancy is carried by a minor or it was conceived as a result of rape.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Nonetheless, other people approve of abortion based on the fact that women have freedom over their bodies. Therefore, every woman is at liberty to decide whether or not to carry a pregnancy to full term. From the podcast, abortions have been stigmatized for a long time. For instance, parents would feel ashamed if their minor daughter is pregnant. Thus, instead of aborting the child, the child is born and raised as the minor’s sister to conceal the wrongdoings of abortion or early pregnancies. Therefore, most parents would rather live with the lie rather than having an abortion.

Presented Information

The information presented in this podcast concerns a Texas case between Roe and Wade on the right to abort. Norma McCovey, known by the street name Jane Roe presented her evidence to legalized her abortion in a setting presided over by Henry Wade. 21-year-old Roe was pregnant with her third child and could no longer pursue her dreams. In the case, Wade surprises the entire Texas state and the United States by legalizing Roe’s abortion. The controversy arises against the 1973 Dallas abortion case on whether abortion should be legal and the extent to which it can be practiced. Mixed feelings about the situation present conditions to legal abortion, including evidence of ovarian cyst, ectopic pregnancies, rape cases, or minorities.

Information Gathering

The podcast is produced by Michael Hobbes, a reporter of the Havana Post and Sera Marshall, a writer of the Black Man Institute. The two co-hosts are covering information from Sera Burbank, an editor of the Seattle Times who covers reproductive health posts. The three discuss the abortion case of Roe vs. Wade and the views on abortion before, during, and after the Texas case. Before the Roe Vs. Wade case, Texas people seeking an abortion would travel to California for such services. Rich women would quickly terminate pregnancies, unlike the middle class.

The Perspective of the Hosts

Sera states that abortion is safer in the early weeks of pregnancy, which is between 7 and 12 weeks. However, it gets more complicated at 20 weeks and may risk the woman’s life. She further agrees that women should have the mandate to control whether or not they should carry a pregnancy to full-term. That the three story-tellers agree that abortion should no longer be stigmatized but rather legalized under conditions mentioned earlier. However, it should be carried out under certain conditions. Also, economic conditions determine whether a person can get access to safe and early abortions.

The Episode as a Commentary

The podcast brings out the societal view of abortion—for instance, the host trace cases of birth control before the civilization period. Also, before the Roe vs. Wade case, abortion access was quite a struggle for middle-class families. The ideas unraveled in the podcast reveal society as judgmental. For instance, one would rather lie about having a child than having an abortion. The arising controversies after Henry Wade’s judgment show how unsatisfied the society is. The ignorance and arrogance borne by society on the matter are alarming, with the organization having control over what women should do. It trades back to a patriarchal society.

Historical and Cultural Significance

The podcast does have a historical significance on the emergence of birth control. There were cases of women controlling the number of children they wanted. Most of such women were wealthy and would fly to Japan for safe abortion. The implication is that abortion was stigmatized, rare, and only accessible to a few people.