Nurses in Australia: Ethics, Morals & Stipulated Rules for Protection - Essay Sample

Introduction

Guidance and decisions are propelled with the right ethics; however, ethics cannot be compared with morals functions. On the contrary, morals are the core attitudes that define an individual's belief in ethics or rely on them for the general development of a co-existence of humans. Nurses in Australia are guided by the boards stipulated rules that ensure the protection of their interest morally as well as their well-being. Should one choose researches on bioethics, it is still more of the same thing just that the latter refers to human life. Equally important is that before publishing an ethics and regulation paper, it should adhere to the "National and Global ethical standards" (British medical journal, 2017). The nursing practice is guided by the following core principles; autonomy, principle of justice, right to privacy, the principle of non-maleficence, fidelity, and veracity (Ingham-Broomfield, 2017).

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Nursing Ethics with the Work Environment

Nursing ethics refer to a branch of applied ethics, which deal with activities in the nursing field. In nursing ethics, many principles, non-maleficence, beneficence, as well as respect for autonomy are shared with medical ethics. The emphasis upon relationships, collaborative care, and human dignity may be used to distinguish the state of nursing ethics. In this point of view, nursing ethics examines the morals involving caring instead of caring by focusing on the interaction between the patient and the nurse and the environment surrounding them at large. This white paper tackles the historical, ethical progressions affecting the nursing researches, technically and systematically allowing a developed framework to which other researchers may find relevance towards the realization of new ethics and regulation directed to the nursing sector.

Moral Harassment

Moral harassment outlines an object of increasing concern to employers, the scientific community, and workers worldwide. This focus involving the ideas is an upward projection within the health environment, as well as psychology and medicine disciplines. This impedes psychic and physical injuries induced by this kind of violation. Scholars have critically affirmed that such working surroundings are evident in health centers, where the elite are mostly the wrongdoers who propagate the workplace, Miss-conducts, or, rather, victims of violence (Cahu et al., 2014). Critically, in such working environment conditions, humiliation and aggressiveness are steadily perpetuated or reproduced, and therefore moral harassment is experienced.

Cahu et al., (2014) study identifies and notes that amongst medical practitioners involved in health care, the principal victims of moral harassment are nurses. As a result, several other scholars have conceptualized the dire need to implementing measures that would be used to safeguard the psychological and physical integrity of professionals in healthcare, particularly nurses' health. The research compiled by Cahu et al. undertook a diverse survey that involved 259 respondent practitioners working in primary and public health centers using questionnaires that were emailed to the participant from the website of the union council. Upon the research completion, it was noted that the perpetrators are in a position to promote repeated attacks, like initial subtle attitudes, which are intensified with time. As a way of assaulting the victim, the harasser chastises humiliates, isolates, and constraints, among other embarrassing situations. This triggers physical and mental suffering among the workers. In various conditions, Moral harassment shows distinct characteristics, and therefore there is considerable anxiety aiming at understanding the moral harassment of nursing professionals.

Patient Approval

According to a history regarding first ethics, they were developed to counter one notorious, Dr. Mengele. The Doctor used to perform ambiguous experiments on twins to the point of killing his specimens (Ingham-Broomfield, 2017). After several years of court battles, it was successfully denoted that Nuremberg principles were to be documented. In that, before any experiment, the voluntary consent approval of the patient is vital and that no physical maim or damages should ensue on their bodies after surgery. Therefore, following the blind tests, the collateral damages to the experiment were the study's specimens this way, posing a threat to the entire human existence. Today, the Human research Ethics necessitates that before the accomplishment of research, a researcher will have to visit their website for confirmation of the respective methodological processes.

In Relation to Resource Allocation

The working surroundings of medical practitioners proved association with the quality of care and the outcomes of an establishment. For monitoring working surroundings, evaluation of the feedback questions and answers proves paramount for checking nursing conditions within the realm of public health. The sole aim of this research is also to balance as well as check on the feedbacks received from nurses pertaining to their working surroundings. Norman et al., (2017), tackled the alignment mentioned above, wherein; an accomplishment was evident from the 5077 various articles perused. Further, after analysis, it was decided that 65% of the same articles embraced inclusivity basing on the 34 feedbacks in diverse settings of working surroundings. (Norman et al., 2017). The sample feedbacks remitted were distinguishable for registered practitioners in a different hospital chosen. Furthermore, six of them were procured to nursing homes as one to suit home healthcare. On the contrary, domains to be covered by the contents were designed for exclusivity and overlap. Finally, most interactive content domains within job surroundings questionnaires featured supportive executives, relations, and groups willing to work together as well as autonomy and professional activities (Norman et al., 2017).

Conclusions

Generally, to adhere to ethics, especially in the medical arena, such articles have expendably tackled the relationships throughout the medical practice, not limited to the need for the pleasant working environment and ethical considerations a medic should consider before putting someone's life at stake. Substantively, the working surroundings could have been unbearable had it not been for various reforms through evolution and amendments.

Reference

British Medical Journal. 2017. Ethics approval of research. British Medical Journal, http://www.bmj.com/about-bmj/resources-authors/ forms-policies-and-checklists/ethics-approval-research.

Cahú, G. R. P., Costa, S. F. G. D., Costa, I. C. P., Batista, P. S. D. S., & Batista, J. B. V. (2014). Moral harassment experienced by nurses in their workplace. Acta Paulista de Enfermagem, 27(2), 151-156.

Ingham-Broomfield, R. (2017). A nurses' guide to ethical considerations and the process for ethical approval of nursing research. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, The, 35(1), 40.

Norman, R. M., & Sjetne, I. S. (2017). Measuring nurses' perception of work environment: a scoping review of questionnaires. BMC nursing, 16(1), 66.