Namesake: Jhumpa Lahiri Explores Changing Identities - Essay Sample

Introduction

Namesake, Jhumpa Lahiri, who is a united states resident of Indian origin from Gogol Ganguli, expresses the ideas of identity as connected to the postcolonial perceptions of transculturation, hybridity, and migration. Regarding the story of "the church on pleasing and thank you" by Moushumi, and about the novel, "how does our language shape the way we think," helps us to understand more about the namesake. The book anticipates the idea of changing identities, an illustration of the characters as refusing to appreciate their traditions and to the Americanized culture with the exploration of the third transnational state where they identify themselves as transnational. Lahiri is battling with two lives involving the issues of religion, race, immigration, and class, which makes her accept that identities are different. Thus this paper explores the story of Lahiri concerning the accounts of "the church on pleasing and thank you" and "how does our language the way we think ." in justifying Lahiri's perception of identities.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

On the issue of the shared language and culture, in the chapter of the namesake, Lahiri gives a detailed expression of how Gogol and Moushumi are fascinated by each other since they realize that they share a particular culture and language. It is a way of life and style that both of them have refused and tempted to stay away from in the past, as it still takes part in reviving them back. He talks about how learning a new language is like learning a new way of life of a certain kind of people in with the way they speak and how they refer to specific events. Thus the way people from cape York, in northern Australia, known Kuuk Thaayorreon how they talk about space. They use the cardinal direction to define space. "There is an ant on your southeast leg" or "move the cup to the north northwest a little bit" hence, people from different areas use the language in their perspectives of their culture.

According to Clark, Aisha, who resides in Banda Aceh, in Indonesia, is going through hard times in trying to find and deciding on which cloth to wear for a date. Aisha faces the difficulties in choosing the right attire just because of the issues with her society where she comes from and its perceptions towards a woman' s look, "..judges a woman on what she wears." In a similar case, Leila Ahmed, in reinventing the veil her view on what to wear, is deliberated on the possible changes that will be experienced over sometime concerning what women should wear as she says that "Living religions are by definition dynamic." From the current world, this statement seems right since the past clothing is bygone, and rules that were upon the dress are never taken seriously.

Ashima and Ashoke when they move to Cambridge in the united states, they feel out of place just because of the way life and the language they encounter with. For instance, when Ashoke is taken to the maternity ward, she gets shocked when she is given a flowered cotton gown as it reaches her knees, which is quite different from where she comes from. Even the way one of the doctors suggest, "don't you worry, Mr. Ganguli, she 's got a long way to go," which depicts the difference in their language as the doctor tries to illustrate time with hours. And the nurse who is from Bengali's expression that she has the long way demonstrates the difference in thinking and the way language and affects our perception towards specific identities. Thus from the story of Lera Broditsky, the word that is spoken by people has a lot of influence more so on the way we perceive things and the world that surrounds us. Thus on the book of how language shapes how you think," it tends to elaborate that there is no identity and prove that language makes one process life differently.

In the relation of the namesake to the church of pleasing and thank you, Moushumi's who happens to be born in England but raised in the united states, when he tries to disappear from her own social identity in pursuing liberty through marriage. To him, the freedom of love seems to be an essential of western culture, which is different from the Bengali customs, thus the western culture, which is the birthplace of Moushumi, which shapes her perception of love and marriage. Thus this relates to the story of Ashoke in namesake, who is an Indian resident. From the fact that she suffered from a train accident, she moves to the united states with her husband Ashima and resides in Cambridge. It is when she is hospital bed and in labor pains that Ashima expresses her feelings to her "i love you sweetheart" words that Ashoke explains has never heard from her husband - hence depicting out how culture and the English language have shaped Ashima in terms of affection and love.

Different languages use different ways in expressing thoughts; according to the scholars, find no difference in the style of people as all our utterances are fragmented as they take just a small number of information that is present. And because of the differences that exist between different speakers from Russia and the Turkish do not mean that they do not take proper consideration of the identical aspects. Therefore according to the believers from different languages and settings argues that human beings do not face the same thing in their perception as every individual's knowledge is quite different. For instance, Oshima's statement "in a day or two you'll be half the size" as they are helping to nurse Ashoke in the hospital during labor pains, Oshima's statement does not mean what he said it has a different meaning to him. He implies that Ashoke will be well in one or two days since she would have delivered as per the doctor's remarks that she had 24 hours. Therefore the way Ashima expresses her statement displays that she is not a native English speaker hence the use of metaphors to symbolize specific hidden meaning. Thus there is no significant difference in thinking and the way he uses his words.

Priori's arguments on whether shapes the perceptions and thinking of an individual find it to be impossible since according to the small community in aboriginal in the western coast of Australia. I came here because of the way the locals, the Kuuk Thaayorre, talk about space. Instead of using words like "left" "right," they use the cardinal points to define space, and it is done in all aspects of their communication. Therefore one must be focused on at all times of their speaking.