Inequality: A Natural Occurrence in Humanity? - Essay Sample

Introduction

There are various arguments placed forward which depict that equality does not apply to be a fundamental rule of humanity as many people would think and in fact, inequality is natural in occurrence due to the difference in people's appearance that would occur in respect to biologic features which comprise of intelligence, strength and also height. With such factors put into play, it would be challenging to level people down to being equals and even being thought of as having the same abilities some, therefore, would appear successful in their quest for wealth and also becoming more successful in the accumulation of wealth. Through the interference of making this wealth, would there be an infringement of people's rights, which would be inclusive of freedom from harm and also the right to one's property? Inequality is formed based on a narrowed set of rights between individuals, differences in the opportunities, and even how legal issues are handled as per the different individuals that are concerned. According to history, restrictions such as freedom to distribute wealth equally would produce a totalitarian regime, and such controlled societies would conclude achieving the state of economic growth that would be favorable to everyone.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

The Role of Natural Factors in Shaping Inequality Among Individuals

Opposing inequality does not stand for the say that people are perfectly equal in all respects to factors such as natural abilities and also income and wealth. With developed programs, the national health system could help meet the needs of human beings while also maintaining the high levels of freedom, showing that freedom and equality less coercion, which is undue.

Rousseau's Notion of Inequality: Examining Natural and Civil Disparities

According to Rousseau (1992), there are two main types of inequality, natural or also physical disparities. Inherent variation however involves differences between biological differences between people, which is a product of nature. Rousseau is not at all concerned with this type of inequality as it does not contribute to the roots of the bias facing the civil society and argues that variation which is a concern to the uprightness of civil society is brought about by factors such as wealth, power, one's rank and also nobility. The action is established through a convention.

The individual seems to be taking a cynical view of a society that is deemed civil. This type of inequality is brought about by men when they stray from their natural state of personal independence and also their free nature to satisfying their needs and even their desires. A wholesome human being would act only for the benefit that would be meant for them, and no one else according to human nature before they would even think of others. They, therefore, act on the instinct of self-preservation.

The Evolution of Human Society and the Emergence of Inequality

Man's selfless acts would go all the way to ensure that they would avoid conflicts with others and also with anything that would disrupt their interest. Rousseau's natural man lacks a reason for others, deeming themselves superior and also of worth than others would, in return leading to arising of issues that cause inequality. The writer mentions that it's morally upright for people to feel unequal, and some people are more deserving than others for the merit that they possess. Rousseau's terms of human inequality are in the context of one's freedom. They were mentioning that it does not go with the capacity to make choices. Without people being equal comes the lack of people's ability for proper decision making and also making new decisions.

The civilization of man is not adequately discussed in Discourse. Still, the most likely causes could be such as when humans came to closer proximity and also began the process of cohabitation. Human equality could explain the change like human reason and language, thus explaining the complexity of the nature of humans, making it challenging to maintain equilibrium.

For Roseau, inequality is hard to notice in the state of life. Therefore, differences felt by individuals are wrought in the soul by the nature in which the natural man would either have pity, which would lead to them being selfless with helping people and considering themselves as equal or self-preservation that is involved in isolating themselves from others making themselves superior thus drawing inequality.

The Impact of Achievement and Wealth on Human Conscience and Social Behavior

Achievements such as tremendous wealth, enfeebles the human conscience, making them distinguish themselves and also make a point of proving themselves better than how others are. Though it is not meant to be socially destructive, it could sometimes lead to one having upright civic and also friendly behavior in a society which only seems to reward distinctions with the wealth which earns one the 'ticket' to be a better person than others and worthy of people's respect.

Joseph Stiglitz's Perspective on Inequality: Addressing Economic and Political Consequences

According to Joseph Stiglitz, it should be clear that there are vast defects of inequalities, such bring rise to severe economic and political consequences which are brought about by a united society breaking and causing damage to itself. His thoughts on equality differ with Rousseau's in the sense that Joseph suggests that inequality is caused by building a new society that happens over time and that numerous alternatives should be adopted to structure the organizations differently. According to the author, inequality also helps individuals in accepting their standards for living and also creating room for political innovation and many changes as globalization and the acquired modern-day attitude.

Based on economic inequality there has been a trigger which resulted in a significant outpour of the analysis and also reflection causing the consequences of the changes with several financial analysts arguing that inequality should not merit the attention that is given to it and that it could vastly draw the attention meant to be given to the real problem facing the nation which happens to be poverty. Inequality would match the attention meant to be for its association by individual behaviors as insinuated be Roseau.

Conclusion

Both responses are successful since both authors, however, agree that in a vast of words, it could be argued that people are categorized as having good character when they happen to be reasonable with their actions, and if they were, it would be an excellent aid in ensuring that people lived in a better world. A world that would render of importance people's personal feelings ensuring equality and, therefore, looking forward to a more prosperous place where social cooperation has been increased. Both also agree that a lot of things should be taken to consideration before calculating the worth of a person. 'Small scale societies may be better adapted than other societies; therefore, people may or may not be equal according to their mechanisms of adaptation (Edgerton, 2000).

References

Edgerton, R. B. (2000). Traditional beliefs and practices-Are some better than others. Culture matters, Lawrence E. Harrison.

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques (1992). Discourse on the Origin of Inequality. Indianapolis, Indiana: Hackett Publishing Co.

Stiglitz, J. E. (2001). Joseph Stiglitz: the rebel within. Anthem Press.