Essay on Ethics Awareness Inventory (EAI): Analyzing Ethical Perspectives Critically

Introduction

The Ethics Awareness Inventory (EAI) entails four main categories of thought, mostly referred to as CORE. The primary purpose is to analyze the various ethical perspectives critically. The first class is the character, according to philosophy, it is termed as the virtue theory, and it is solely based on personal virtue (Hailes et al., 2020). The other category is the obligation, also referred to as deontology in the domain. Moreover, it focuses on the need for doing what is considered morally right. The third class is results; in philosophy, it is known as utilitarianism, it is concerned with the consequences resulting from actions performed by an individual (Brand & McEwen, 2016). The last category is equality, referred to as postmodernity in the field of philosophy. Postmodernity assumes the usual standards of wrong and right but focuses on the practical analysis of the rules. Nonetheless, the three sections of EAI, which include application, awareness, and articulation are vital in interpreting and understanding the results of the survey.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Importance of Understanding Personal Ethics Perspectives

Personal ethics are often as a result of developing processes in a person's life that become deeply attached to the individual over time. Furthermore, personal ethics are crucial dictators of how individuals conduct themselves. Nonetheless, personal ethics are important in the psychology field. The personal ethics immensely assist in the molding of ethical behaviors in individuals entrusted with various responsibilities since they champion for respect on the patient's dignity and right.

Furthermore, the principles of psychology in the code of honor is comprehensive and covers numerous aspects of life. The principles include fidelity and responsibility, justice, integrity, non-maleficence and beneficence, and respect for other people's dignity and rights. Collectively, the general principles aid psychologists in delivering sound decisions (Hailes et al., 2020). Moreover, the American Psychological Association solves numerous complaints of violation of ethical standards committed almost every year.

Relationship between Personal and Professional Ethics in Psychology

Professional ethics entails the ethics that an individual is obliged to follow in line with their business activities or professional interactions. On the other hand, personal ethics are the ethics that a given individual identifies with, particularly in their daily interactions with different people and situations that they encounter in their day to day life (Brand & McEwen, 2016). The interaction of the two ethics is eminent when individuals attempt to maintain their usual way of life while at the same time trying to balance their professional obligations.

In most cases, the American Psychological Association codes of ethics do not interfere with how the psychologists behave while in leisure. However, taking an open stand on the issue may spur a state of professional strain in the relationship between personal ethics and professional ethics (Brand & McEwen, 2016). Consequently, the individual's career may be severely be affected; thus, several ethical codes should be considered before taking of public position by a psychologist concerning the controversial issue on the relationship between personal ethics and professional ethics.

APA Decision-Making Process Facilitates More Ethical Professional Behavior

The APA cognitive process of deciding between two or more relatively close alternative is fundamental in shaping ethical professional behaviors. The other options may range from being slightly simple to very complex options to choose on. To understand the concept of decision making, psychologists have developed two strategies, which include statistically analyzing the multiple decisions within the complex choices, and manipulation of simple decisions through experiments while taking into consideration the recurring elements within the possibilities.

The American Psychology Association code of conduct and psychologists' principles of practice enforce the rules that a psychologist must follow in the line of duty. The resulting collective effect of these codes is the restriction of the professional behaviors of the professionals (Hailes et al., 2020). The decision-making process does not only provide for codes that regulate the behavior of the professionals but also other individuals within a given environment such as clients, trainees, and those who participate in research.

Relationship between Ethical Awareness Inventory Scores and Aspirational Enforceable Standards.

There is a significant relationship between ethical awareness inventory scores and the concept of aspiration and enforceable standards. The ethical standards focus on enforcing the implementation of the morally accepted behaviors within the many aspects of life. At the same time, EAI scores establish several existing challenges in the implementation process of the behaviors. An individual is faced with various frustrations while addressing ethical dilemmas (Hailes et al., 2020). In most cases, the choice perceived as being right may not necessarily be right; thus, the individual making the decision does not benefit from the option.

Conclusion

Inconclusion, the above information justifies the need for an individual to understand several personal perspectives. Moreover, a person must know the relationship between professional and personal ethics in the field of psychology, the APA decision making process and how it influences professional behaviors, and the relationship between an individual's awareness inventory scores associates with both aspirational and enforceable standards (Brand & McEwen, 2016). Furthermore, personal ethics are vital in determining the cause of a dilemma due to decision making. Consequently, one can attain trust by knowing what is wrong and right through the understanding of personal ethics perspective.

References

Brand, B. L., & McEwen, L. (2016). Ethical standards, truths, and lies. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 17(3), 259-266. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299732.2016.1114357

Hailes, H. P., Ceccolini, C. J., Gutowski, E., & Liang, B. (2020). Ethical guidelines for social justice in psychology. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2020-07540-001