The United States is devoted to strengthening partners globally to achieving their authentic self-defence desires and to advance their capabilities to address common security challenges. The U.S. unit of States oversees the majority of government to government weapons transfers and profitable export authorizing of the U.S. source security technologies and equipment, consistent with the internal regulations and other relevant statutory authorities and international agreements. The U.S. defence and foreign strategies encompass all the legislative decisions and engagements. This paper gives an analysis of the objectives of the U.S. foreign rule to advocate for trust among partners, fear among opponent nations, and respect among the neutral states.
The U.S. mostly focuses on the relationships that the state has with other foreign countries. Its military strategies are restricted the strategic plans for the security of the nation. However, since the death of the Soviet Union, American forces have been the most powerful defence forces on the view of other nations (Legvold, 2017). Their lethality, competence, and international reach have been confirmed several times. However, U.S. policy formulators have found it a challenge to realize their goals through threats.
The foreign and security policies primarily majored on the disputes on territories and economic trade concerns. The history of U.S. foreign strategies is mainly on the actions that were undertaken by the nation to protect or expand the nation's borders. For instance, the first external mission done by the U.S. Marines was a disposition to Tripoli in 1804, to avert pirates from working out of the port and other areas of the Barbary Coast, to protect America's capabilities to trade in the world markets (Moens, 2017).
Nowadays, social issues are given more attention, and America's nation has responded to these issues in several ways, for instance, sending relief to areas such as Africa's Sahel desert, which is experiencing starvation because of adverse drought. The policy formulators have engaged themselves in global efforts to fight illiteracy, slavery, discrimination based on gender and ethnicity and a broad array of other humanitarian concerns. Environmental concerns such as global warming and protection of the endangered species have also been a key part in America's foreign policy program.
The controversies and conspiracy were complicated by events in Europe, predominantly the rise of French power and the efforts of Britain to uphold their place as the prevailing economic power. The war of 1812 delivered substantial support for the fears of the public America because it proved that the nation was truly susceptible to direct assaults (Larive, 2016). Because of its strategic location of the United States, it enabled it to pursue the basic belief of Washington's call for profitable relations without a political predicament. This view resulted in the adoption of policies that stressed unilateralism and isolations.
The World Trade Centre and the Pentagon, on September 11, 2001, altered the defence and the foreign policies. It was a confirmation that the U.S., despite their status as the superpower nation, it was still vulnerable to attacks. Through the declaration of war against terrorism, America's administration focused its external policies and military resources on bringing together the United States and its partners for collective efforts on war. The president plays a key role in conducting and shaping foreign policy. However, defence and foreign policymaking are subjected to political pressure that outlines internal policymaking. During the Cold War, there was a public agreement that the main objective of American External policies was to protect the American states and its allies from military pressures posed by the Soviet Union and its partners.
American legislators were reluctant to outspread recognition to other socialist nations even before the era of the Cold War. In other situations, the American government has maintained good relations with other nations even if it does not comply with the policies of that country. Furthermore, the U.S government provides a growing amount of indirect and direct support for trade and industrial development (Pauly, 2017). Most of this assistance is meant to reinforce the military abilities of the beneficiary government. Also, sometimes some activities are deliberately concealed from the public can have a considerate impact. Some of those concealed actions are justified on the basis that it could not be conducted successfully with the public view. Sometimes it is used to protect the lives of the individuals involved.
More attention has recently been paid to public diplomacy, with the main focus on the promotion of the U.S. Soft power. The public diplomacy has been viewed differently by critics as a means of spreading propaganda as a substitute of U.S policy (Washington, 2016). This diplomacy is allied to different mechanisms, such as radio liberty, cultural exchange, which promote the spread and acceptance and understanding of the values and interest of the nation.
Conclusion
In summary, the U.S foreign policies play the role of promoting trust amongst allies and respect amongst neutral countries. For example, social issues are given more attention, and America's nation has responded to these issues in several ways, for instance, sending relief to areas such as Africa's Sahel desert, which is experiencing starvation because of adverse drought. The policy formulators have engaged themselves in global efforts to fight illiteracy, slavery, discrimination based on gender and ethnicity and a broad array of other humanitarian concerns
References
Larive, M. H. (2016). Debating European security and defense policy: understanding the complexity. Routledge.
Legvold, R. (2017). The revolution in Soviet foreign policy. In Contemporary Issues in Soviet Foreign Policy (pp. 357-369). Routledge.
Moens, A. (2017). The foreign policy of George W. Bush: Values, strategy, and loyalty. Routledge.Pauly, R. J. (2017). US foreign policy and the Persian Gulf: safeguarding American interests through selective multilateralism. Routledge.
Washington, G. (2016). Farewell address. September, 17(1796), 173.
Cite this page
Essay Example on U.S. Strengthens Global Partnerships to Enhance Self-Defence. (2023, Feb 23). Retrieved from https://proessays.net/essays/essay-example-on-us-strengthens-global-partnerships-to-enhance-self-defence
If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the ProEssays website, please click below to request its removal:
- The Issue of Race in the United States Essay Example
- Unilateral Rights and Exceptional Circumstances: Asda vs. Bateman Case Study
- Expository Essay on Social Justice and Diversity in the US
- Essay Sample on Las Carpas and Rasquache
- Essay Example on US: A Superpower Promoting Global Democracy
- Paper Example on California's Water Crisis: Drought, Urbanization and Loss of Wetland
- Essay Sample on The ACA: Transforming US Healthcare System Since 2010