Introduction
Through a series of the activities and colonialism over Canadians, it has helped to shape the Governance and rules they follow to date. The process has enabled us to understand the indigenous governances as well as the justices that existed and the changes made for the wellbeing of the community. In light review, the paper will provide an insight into the indigenous Governance and justices to Canadian Governance as well as how we fairly deal with such discriminations.
Through Canadians governance, we have learned that no there is need to establish individual land ownership rules. Land ownership and repossession is one of the paramount issues that was faced in the colonial period. Canada owns its land on a community basis; however, through the intrusion of an uninvited stranger, the system started changing. The visitors initiated the trade and later on started possessing the land in the area. Their number kept increasing hence gaining more power over Canadians. Also, European started oppression of Canadians in their land as well as extracting valuable minerals. Therefore land acquisition and ownership should be established and the legal document issued to avoid confliction (chapter 1, page 5, Manuel & Derrickson, 2015).
Legal acts are initiated to promote repossession of the land through negotiations launched UN union. The chief Neskonlith also tried to end racism. The indigenous justice background is to establish fairness across all racism (chapter 1, page 8, Manuel & Derrickson, 2015). Therefore despite one's ethnicity and background, land acquisition and possession is a vital element that requires equality. It is critical evict a resident of place and turning him or her to slavery. Therefore negotiation to introduce laws in protection of the indigenous people land is enacted. The justice is both discussed in the united nation as of right of the indigenous people to possess their land despite failure to produce their title deeds.
Through institutional and informal discrimination, Indians faced a lot of challenges that needed to be addressed. The indigenous people served in jails despite being innocent. Also, the disabled were seen as lesser people. The state caused injustices that caused an imbalance in society. It is also noticed that the education system in Canada discriminated Indians thus poor access to knowledge (chapter 2, page 6, Manuel & Derrickson, 2015). The state, therefore, allows us to understand the impact and the nature of discrimination through racism. Also, we learn that some constitutional amendments can be done to improve social welfare and justices among all people of different races.
Through national Indian brotherhood was formed to liberate indigenous people from slavery and oppression. Union of British Columbia Indian chiefs were determined to ensure land reclaim as well as equal treatment was passed to them (chapter 4, page 7, Manuel & Derrickson, 2015). It was critical to give up on what is right for them to demand. We learn that right to own and possess properties can be reign forced through negotiation for both antagonizing communities.
The Indian act was dissolved and absorbed in the Italian-Canadian ethnic group to allow further service delivery to indigenous people. The policy was to free Indian people to develop as well as the introduction of favoring legal laws to socially, economic and cultural equality in the land (chapter 5, page 4, Manuel & Derrickson, 2015). However, it is a critical process that shows injustice governance to the indigenous people as they share their resources to intruders. The white paper critically was intended to vanish all Indians in Canadian politics. Therefore it clearly shows that there is unfairness in the distribution of the power among them, thus unfair dealings. However, the constitutional rights of the Canadian parliament still enact the Indian act that creates discrimination and subjection of some Canadians (chapter 7, page 5, Manuel & Derrickson, 2015). Therefore it is just to eliminate the constitutional right on a particular ethnicity, thus incorporating overall rights to all Canadians. Also, in the attempt to improve on justices of the land ownership, the Government has to improvise and induce individual or private access to land. From the constitutional background, we come to understand that justices can be achieved by engaging both sides in a constitution agreement.
We also learn that the more divergence communities become to each other, the more they yield conflicts. That has been demonstrated through native youth action. The critical bit of the action is that there is a clear division in terms of education delivery for both Canadians and Indians. Therefore the reserve school set by native youth is to ensure they politicize children. Also, the difference in education brings injustice to what parents should offer to their children. However, the conflict build as Canadian Government tries to close all reserve school and pull Indians to Canadian school where they are assimilated in Canadian culture (chapter 9, page 9, Manuel & Derrickson, 2015).
Political factor influenced the occupation of the indigenous people. Therefore no justices or fairness was attributed in securing the jobs. At this level of injustice, Indians experienced a tough time as they were enslaved in the land due to ethnicity discrimination (chapter 4, page 5, Manuel & Derrickson, 2015). Indian affairs were aimed at creating conducive and freedom of all Indians in Canada. The maltreatment of Indian children is unjust and unfair. The essences of the injustices were to subject the Indians to slavery life as well as absorbing them into the Canadians way of life. The freedom to express and practices their culture was exterminated.
The great concern the government struggle is to ensure they remain neutral about the extinguishment of people living in Canada despite the racism. The Government try to cover up indigenous people through deposition and taking those claimed to be against the laws of the Government to refugee territory (chapter 10, page 6, Manuel & Derrickson, 2015). In other words, the land is left to be secured by the Canadians and have them for use. It is unfair dealing that has been critically addressed and also provides the basis of new laws to induce justice. It was also from treaties formed to starve some ethnic groups so that their children were exchanged for food. They were treated as slaves. Therefore the Indian movement has remained the central player of justice. It was initiated to liberate government discrimination on service delivery. The Northern Quebec agreement provide an aisle that Government would let to equity in both jobs securing and treatments among all Canadians. Indians at to some extent, some of whom are relocated to their refugee territory fail to surrender their properties and wealth. The unjust act keeps them fighting with Canadian Government creating more shame on themselves.
Under the context of antagonistic, two peoples have led to the termination of all development in Canada. The Canadians still hold a pre-colonial and colonial perception of land ownership. They, therefore, tend to reject Indian ways and movements to fair dealing(chapter 13, page 5, Manuel & Derrickson, 2015). Through negotiation and talk over the land issue as well as fair dealing is a critical procedure, the Canadian Government needs to initiate. It would exterminate the colonial unjust and unfair Governance hence introducing co-peaceful existence of two ethnicities.
The reforms in the original act of 1876, department of Indians affair have to induce the individual ownership or possession whereby one can resell it to non-Indians. In the reform, fair distribution of land will be achieved, and the Canadian Government will exercise and offer certificates of possession (chapter 7, page 6, Manuel & Derrickson, 2015). Regarding aboriginal problems, some struggles to recognize indigenous rights were learned. It creates the basis of fair dealing by the Government. However, the Government can never buy, sell, or even extinguish aboriginal title and rights. It, therefore, calls for united nation law against discrimination by racism and ethnicity. The act prohibits the discrimination of all race by the Canadian Government. It has helped induce fair and just judgment across all race in the state.
In the constitutional dimension, the critical bit of the discrimination in colonial times is to ensure that indigenous people have freedom over intruders. However, some strategies have been developed to incorporate others in constitutional fairness. The lobby to create a common constitution act as a result of the violence that existed between Non-Canadian and Canadians. The Government, through protestors, require to establish a fair way of living peacefully among themselves. New Democratic Party is formed to deal with the amendment of constitution on aboriginal title and right (chapter 14, page 5, Manuel & Derrickson, 2015).
United nation left the Canada parliament in the discussion of how to affect the constitutional express. In the process, the boycotting of the rights and fair dealing was mitigated. The process leads to seeking the rights to own proper by slight adjustment of the constitution. However, it did not last long, and battle again commenced. The Federal Government remained to stand still as grassroots mobilization was done. It forced aboriginal laws, security, and land management. The fair aspect was then achieved once again.
Chief governed and harmonized all activities that took place in the towns. The great emphasis on the event was to observe ideal justice and right over each other. Was also an arbitrator to solve the racism tacks by the implementation of the constitutional express. The archaeological sites also were under protection. It was to ensure both cultural valuables are well protected and governed hence equality in both races.
The courts were also established to play a central role of decentralizing both races form injustice acts. The royal commission was established to investigate the aboriginal people regarding their location and historical data. The commission aims to pass fair judgment to both races in matters pertaining to discrimination and landmarks (chapter 15, page 1, Manuel & Derrickson, 2015). The grievances and negotiation among the two parties are always held to reduce injustice among themselves.
Economic freedom was also a paramount factor that led to the battle between the Canadians and Indians. The harvesting of tree licenses was not given to Indians. As a result, the resolution restructures ownership of the land was vital. The discrimination existed to exterminate Indians. However, it was critical to let others harvest trees while leaving others. Therefore that would trigger a battle. Negotiation was all solution to the issue. The economic power-sharing among the Secwepemc and Indians was the essential way to justify their harmonious living.
The sovereignty of indigenous right creates a great quest on who is more superior to the other. However, the Government has the mandate to exercise judicial practices in settling the conflict between the two races (chapter 10, page 6, Manuel & Derrickson, 2015). The judgment, therefore, should be passed in a lawful interrogation. Also, the legislative arm of the Government contributes to identifying the legal action to take in the judgment undergoing. The perpetual struggle, therefore, must be effected to bring about the recognition of the indigenous people
The negligence of leadership has led to all unjust and unfair dealing. Indigenous people are ready to surrender all their belonging in the fight of their rights. Besides, the Government is expected to negotiate over the national issues affecti...
Cite this page
Research Paper on Indigenous Governance to Canadian: Exploring Changes & Discriminations. (2023, Feb 13). Retrieved from https://proessays.net/essays/research-paper-on-indigenous-governance-to-canadian-exploring-changes-discriminations
If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the ProEssays website, please click below to request its removal:
- Are Video Games Beneficial or Detrimental?
- Justice in Disguise - Essay Sample
- Bias in Family Nurse Practitioner (FNP) Paper Example
- Women's Fight for Equal Rights: A Historical Struggle - Essay Sample
- Paper Example on Police Brutality in USA: The Case of George Floyd and Beyond
- Paper Example on Michael Ondaatje: Journey Through Mixed Cultures
- Report on Revolutionary Alliance: Past and Present Goals for China's Liberation and Reconstruction