Classifications of Student's in Sports Programs Based on Gender - Paper Example

Introduction

Federal laws outline directives concerning the participation of students in sports with gender discrimination. Title IX which is a declaration Act of 1972 was made by the Federal law court to provide directives towards the participation of both genders in sports without any single barn concerning gender stereotypes. Title IX specifies the guidelines that require the school organizations to respect the right of every K-12 student in sports activities in both public and private schools (Acosta & Carpenter, 2014). This paper seeks to analyze the legal issues concerning K-12 student's participation in sports program without gender discrimination.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Title IX is a federal law that was accepted in the US early in 2012 even though it was formed in 1972. The law enables the classification of students in sports to enhance the inclusivity of all students in sports irrespective of their gender. Before the enactment of the Act, K-12 students were being discriminated against enjoying the participation advantages in games due to their gender. However, today's education system is affiliated with aspects of financing all students with the talent to participate and compete in sports to the level that they are capable of attaining. In that perspective, the participants have been empowered to portray their ability to challenge their peers in great sporting activities. Inclusivity in sports was brought up by a series of lawsuits and court's amendments to come up with the current freedom in the participation in various sporting activities.

Before the adoption of Title IX, various controversies were preventing the smooth enactment of the Act. For instance, Title IX faced harsh amendments trials specifically on May 20, 1974. In that year, Senator Tower demanded the exemption of revenue from supporting all sporting activities in schools. On the other hand, Senator Javits, in 1972 came up with the proposal of derailing all the efforts of Title IX serving the participants unconditionally (Stevenson, 2010). The senator outlined the need for the outlining regulations to be put up as a way of controlling the inclusion of K-12 students in sports according to gender.

On the other hand, the amendment reviews were signed and submitted to the Congress to be considered. However, a more destructive proposal was made and tried out by Rep. O'Hara in 1975. O'Hara also introduced Bill 8394 which wanted all revenues attached to sports in schools to be cut and support other games. Anderson (2012) outlined that the bill faced objection before reaching the house of Congress. In 1980, the department of education developed an oversight of compliance which described a limit of financial coverage. It was made to cover only the participants who had scholarships regarding Grove V. Bell (Eckes, 2017). The finance portion was not mindful of serving both males and females until 1988 when a female athlete won thus challenged the restriction that was placed to prevent the financial support for female athletes. Cohen v. Brown (1996) appeal stated the inclusion of females in the docket of financial backing thus minimized discrimination (Puzey, 2013).

Conclusion

Even though Brown argued that female students showed no interests in sports, there was a light in March 2005 which empowered female students to take part in games and be supported financially. Female athletics participation was then added to the list of Title IX Act under full compliance. Therefore, K-12 students require equal protection for the right to financial support to take part in all sports for both genders. Unlike the time before the adoption of equal rights in Title IX, the current situations constraints schools to offer each student the right to financial aid to take part in sports.

References

Anderson, P. M. (2012). Title ix at forty: title ix at forty: An introduction and historical review of forty legal developments that shaped gender equity law. Marq. Sports L. Rev., 22, 325-695.

Acosta, R. V., & Carpenter, L. J. (2014). Woman in Intercollegiate Sport: A Longitudinal, National Study. Thirty-Seven Year Update, 1977-2014. Acosta-Carpenter.

Eckes, S. E. (2017). Title IX at 45: Equal Treatment of Students in High School Athletic Programs. Am. UJ Gender Soc. Pol'y & L., 25, 391.

Puzey, B. K. (2013). Title IX and Baseball: How the Contact Sports Exemption Denies Women Equal Opportunity to America's Pastime. Nev. LJ, 14, 1000.

Stevenson, B. (2010). Beyond the classroom: Using Title IX to measure the return to high school sports. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 92(2), 284-301.