Argumentative Essay on Social Media Policies in Colleges

The freedom of expression is one of the most fundamental and key rights for any individual living in the 21st Century. Not only does the freedom encompass the right to express oneself to whatever audience they please, but also advocates for the open access to media. The Freedom of Expression is imperative to the promotion of the progress of man as the sun and rain are to the survival of Earth. As crucial as this freedom is, it is quite unfortunate and heartbreaking to learn that there is a lot of censorship that takes place especially from groups of varying opinions. Censorship is primarily advocated as a primary response for the traditional groups that are easily offended by another person's idea or indulgence in creativity. When such groups have a direct influence on the individual, such as being in a position of power, the individuals in question are automatically forced to withdraw some statements or monitor their words in fear. Consequentially, they end up swallowing their words and keeping some opinions to themselves. Whenever the issue of deprivation of freedom of speech is addressed, many people affiliate it with confinement and threat. However, a simple act such as censoring the words of someone can amount to a deprivation of the same. When it comes to the college setting, institutions have a policy that forbids certain clauses of expression. For instance, the current policy forbids the expression of opinions that are intended to threaten, abuse, or harass people based on religion, race, color, sexual orientation, age, among others. This paper seeks to vouch for specific changes to the student conduct policy related to social media use.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

An old saying goes that change is the only constant thing in life. Some of the policies that are still employed in our institutions were meant for our forefathers and those that preceded them. Needless to say, a lot has changed since then and the same has not been reflected in the current policies. Policies concerning freedom of expression have hardly been reviewed and revised since then despite the various changes and advancements in the communication sector. For instance, the internet was unheard of in the era when such policies were being made. The contention that since they serve "people in general intrigue," media ought to eagerly acknowledge an ethical judge to choose what will and what won't be scattered is both clueless and hazardous. The most concerning issue is that no one will have the chance to vote in favor of the general population accused of figuring out what data is left on the cutting room floor. More regrettable yet, certain lower life individuals with an eye on the global control will dependably be against web-based social networking.

Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram were not conversation topics in colleges 8-10 years ago. Moreover, they had not been invented yet. Less than a decade later, colleges have been punctuated with an influx of internet consumption as well as social media overstimulation. Social media has become an unavoidable economic, political, social as well as cultural commodity (Johnstone). Unfortunately, social media in learning institutions has become a double-edged sword and it is up to the management to weigh the probable benefits versus the probable threats and make informed decisions. Based on internal factors such as college population, management, core values and external factors such as location, religion, and political views; different institutions should differ in social media policies. Such policies are not a one size fits all and thus, there is no such a thing as an overall policy for social media use.

Applying to school is unpleasant. Regardless of how hard students endeavor to overlook those extended periods of time of slaving over affirmations papers, pouring over SAT think about the book and going by innumerable school grounds, that unease and tension one feels for three years prior is very simple to review (Custers et. Al). Between dedicating ourselves completely to extracurricular exercises and attempting to raise our GPAs as secondary school seniors, there wasn't the ideal opportunity for much else as we concentrated on where we would put in the following four long periods of our lives. But now, school candidates have another thing to stress over everything else: their web-based life accounts.

It's not as though social media life wasn't at that point famous three years prior, yet in only three years, the pattern has raised to another level. Youngsters presently have a plenty of records in different destinations, for example, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Google+, just to give some examples. Those records are helpful for social connection and systems administration, yet for a school candidate, the destinations have turned out to be rearing justification for improper material that could at last cost them they pine for school acknowledgment letters.

As per a report by The New York Times, 31 percent of 381 school affirmations officers who took an interest in a Kaplan phone survey confessed to taking a gander at a candidate's Facebook or other individual internet-based life page with an end goal to take in more about them, up from only 10 percent in 2008. Another 29 percent of those reviewed said that they have Googled a candidate. School confirmations officers are investing an expanding measure of energy online as they utilize understudies' web-based life records to decide if their submitted applications coordinate their real persona.

Universities have denied certain understudies affirmation in light of their officers' discoveries, regardless of the candidates' noteworthy GPAs, test scores, and different achievements. What's more, those understudies are not advised that their online networking profiles are the reason for their dismissal. This intrusion of protection isn't supported, yet it likewise isn't restricted (Callas). Utilizing web-based life as an acknowledgment marker is moderately new, so there are no standards or impediments to the training at general colleges. There are at present no set controls in line to characterize what internet stalking is proper and what goes too far.

A broad collection of writing exists on different parts of internet-based life. The Pew Internet and American Life Project is a pioneer here-directing and making accessible an extensive variety of concentrates on the point of long-range informal communication (Akbas, and Fenerci). There is likewise a functioning examination network tending to the part of social-media life in such assorted regions as the lives of adolescents, individual security, and political developments.

Conclusion

Posting and expressing views via social media networking media arrangements, in any case, has transcendently shown up in the business exchange press. This work, as may be normal, has a tendency to be soberer minded: why associations ought to have web-based life approaches, how to compose these strategies, and how to use internet-based life for the advantage of the association (Akbas, and Fenerci). To be sure, creating web-based life arrangements for organizations, and the fitting degree and substance of those approaches, is such a noteworthy issue, to the point that no not as much as the United States Federal National Labor Relations Board has issued a report investigating legitimate cases in which managers' online networking strategies went under inquiry, and giving direction to building up a lawfully agreeable web-based life strategy. The legitimate need may likewise be the driver in the investigation of the part of web-based life in the wellbeing training condition.

Works Cited

Akbas, Murat, and Tulay Fenerci. "Social Media Policies In University Libraries". Bilgi Dunyasi, vol 17, no. 2, 2016. University And Research Librarians' Association, doi:10.15612/bd.2016.518.

CALLAS, CECILIA. "Colleges Shouldn'T Look At Social Sites | Daily Trojan". Daily Trojan, 2018, https://dailytrojan.com/2013/11/12/colleges-shouldnt-look-at-social-sites/. Accessed 19 July 2018.

Custers, Bart et al. "Privacy Expectations Of Social Media Users: The Role Of Informed Consent In Privacy Policies". Policy & Internet, vol 6, no. 3, 2014, pp. 268-295. Wiley, doi:10.1002/1944-2866.poi366.

Johnston, Jane. "'Loose Tweets Sink Fleets' And Other Sage Advice: Social Media Governance, Policies And Guidelines". Journal Of Public Affairs, vol 15, no. 2, 2014, pp. 175-187. Wiley, doi:10.1002/pa.1538.