Americans Fight for Peace, Stability and Disarmament in Iraq - Essay Sample

Introduction

Americans had been informed that the war against Iraq was important as well as necessary. Moreover, Americans were as well informed that there existed weapons associated with mass destruction. There was a need to ensure that peace and stability had prevailed to America as a broken country (Brandee-J-Tecson, 2005). Also, there was an initiative to disarm the country by taking away weapons associated with mass destruction, end the support of Saddam Hussein on terrorism as well as free the Iraqi people from such a repressive regime. This paper aims to explore the war against Iraq.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Americans had been informed that the war against Iraq was important as well as necessary. Moreover, Americans were as well informed that there existed weapons associated with mass destruction (Manal, 2013). Furthermore, there was a need to ensure that peace and stability had prevailed to America as a broken country. "I served in the military, so I know we are funding a useless war because the war has been over for years and we are still there, kids are dying for no reason, and it is killing the American taxpayers' dollars."

There was an initiative to disarm the country by taking away weapons associated with mass destruction, end the support of Saddam Hussein on terrorism as well as free the Iraqi people from such a repressive regime (Danny, 2017). On 1st May, George W Bush, who was the then United States of the American president, made a speech as he declared that the war was over by saying, "The battle of Iraq is one victory in a war on terror that began on September 11th, 2001." The looting, which has majorly taken place in Baghdad as well as other major cities, had contributed to the destruction of the infrastructure in the country (Frank, 2003). As a result of the war, there was a high rate of unemployment, which became worse due to the disbandment of the army of the former regime. In most parts of Iraq, the war had continued for a long time as violent rebellion developed over time. Various coalition militaries which collaborated with Iraq were highly targeted. Moreover, there was massive looting of several arms together with ammunition, which majorly contributed to the insurgency.

Currently, Americans negatively perceive the war that had occurred in Iraq as compared to other times since the invasion had taken place over four years ago, according to the latest New York Times or CBS News poll (Brandee-J-Tecson, 2005). According to the poll, 61% of citizens of the United States of America maintain that America ought to have kept away from Iraq while 76% of Americans insist that the situation is becoming worse in Iraq. Furthermore, the poll states that 47% of Americans insist that the situation in Iraq is becoming very badly (Manal, 2013). However, many citizens of America have supported the continued initiative associated with financing the war provided that the government of Iraqi meets its specific goals.

According to the figures obtained from the Coalition Casualty Count of Iraq, which often gathers too much data from America, over 2,000 troops have been lost, where almost a third became discovered to be 20 years to 22 years (Danny, 2017). The fatality rate was approximated to be at 11.7% among people aged 21 years. Soldiers that were in their mid-20s to late-20s made up about 37% of deaths that had occurred, which had consisted of 70% of American casualties that were under 30 years of age (Frank, 2003). Nearly half of those who had died were soldiers; a quarter were the Marines, while 15% consisted of the specific National Guard. Over three-quarters approximated at 78% became killed in combats while over 93% became killed after President Bush had officially ended the major combat in May in the year 2003.

Men suffered from several casualties where there were only 46 female fatalities. 73% were white, 11% Hispanic, 10.7% black, while other ethnicities made up the remaining 5% (Brandee-J-Tecson, 2005). 40% left behind their spouses, while 30% of those who survived were children. Roadside bombs, also known as improvised explosive devices, majorly resulted to hostile deaths at about 28%. On the other hand, firefights and heavy gunfire accounted for about 24% of hostile deaths (Manal, 2013). Consequently, the Army established a special unit that focused on learning as well as teaching various soldiers about IEDs in March.

The average American taxpayer had to pay about $7,500 to directly fund wars that occurred in Afghanistan, Iraq as well as Syria after the occurrence of between 9 to 11 attacks. According to the data from the Defense Department, this fiscal year, every American taxpayer will have to pay up to $289 for both wars (Danny, 2017). In the year 2018, the amount of money paid per American taxpayer for the wars will reduce to $281 in case the Congress would pass the unchanged spending request of the White House, which would never happen (Frank, 2003). Moreover, another reason why the number would probably change is that Trump administration had planned to send more America troops directly to Afghanistan.

Americans were discovered to have paid too much money for the wars that occurred in the year 2010, with an average of about $767 per piece. The annual amount reduced through the year 2016 to about $204 for each taxpayer before growing once more as America increased its airstrike campaign massively against Iraq and Syria as Islamic states (Brandee-J-Tecson, 2005). Furthermore, the National Defense Authorization Act of the year 2017 directly ordered the Pentagon as well as IRS to compile as well as publicly post the information on the website of the Defense Department. Also, Rep. John Lewis, D-Georgia, decided to add the law or legislation to the existing defense policy last year after several earlier attempts (Manal, 2013). By October next year, the Pentagon's war shares in Afghanistan, Iraq as well as Syria will have by then collectively cost American taxpayers over $1.5 trillion according to the figures from the Defense Department.

The single area which represents a noticeable development involves the development associated with an actively associated civil society that did not exist under the regime of Saddam Hussein. Through various organizations, university campuses as well as individual leadership efforts, Iraqi people demonstrated strong resilience as well as determination associated with not relapsing into the particular sectarian violence which had threatened to tear the entire country apart from the year 2006 to the year 2008 (Danny, 2017). Similarly, there exists a rigorous voice associated with opposition as well as protests, which reflect a population that has the ability to challenge poorly-functioning governments directly.

None of such was possible in the past, including fathomable that occurred ten years ago. At the same time, even at the time when the state government may become quite stagnant, the particular provincial councils have become more active as well as influential (Frank, 2003). Over time, there has been an understanding which states that every politics is local. Partnerships that existed between the civil society together with provincial councils had focused on improving various basic services, increase job opportunities as well as providing public security, have been increasing daily.

There were high hopes in the year 2003 when America, as well as its allies, decided to invade Iraq, ousted Saddam Hussein as well as declare their intention associated with freeing the Iraqi people. However, the task has never been quick or even easy (Brandee-J-Tecson, 2005). Currently, violence, together with bloodshed, have been massive in Iraq, where terrorist attacks, as well as suicide bombings, have been regular (Manal, 2013). In addition, there have been deep sectarian divisions majorly between Shia together with Sunni Muslims. The country has been majorly depended on aid from overseas, where it always becomes caught in downward spirals.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Americans had been informed that the war against Iraq was important as well as necessary. Moreover, Americans were as well informed that there existed weapons associated with mass destruction. There was a need to ensure that peace and stability had prevailed to America as a broken country. Currently, Americans negatively perceive the war that had occurred in Iraq as compared to other times since the invasion had taken place over four years ago, according to the latest New York Times or CBS News poll. However, many citizens of America have supported the continued initiative associated with financing the war provided that the government of Iraqi meets its specific goals.

References

Brandee-J-Tecson. 2005. Almost 70 Percent of U.S. Casualties in Iraq Under Age 30. Retrieved from http://www.mtv.com/news/1512285/almost-70-percent-of-us-casualties-in-iraq-under-age-30/

Danny Sjursen. 2017. What Are American Soldiers Dying For? Retrieved from https://www.thenation.com/article/what-are-american-soldiers-actually-dying-for/

Frank Newport. 2003. Seventy-Two Percent of Americans Support War Against Iraq. Retrieved from https://www.defenseone.com/politics/2017/09/taxes-united-states-war-iraq-afghanistan-syria/141337/

Manal Omar. 2013. Iraq Today - The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. Retrieved from https://www.usip.org/blog/2013/04/iraq-today-good-bad-and-ugly