Adherence in Diabetes Patients Assignments Paper Example

Assignment 1

Insight

In the assessment of the five potential variable that hinders samples from keeping track in the management plan of diabetes mellitus II. An insight I got from the first post of my friend is how important mixed model satisfies this test. The model offers an idea that we all rely upon. The mixed model provides a variety of option in the extended run criteria of assessing potential factors that hinder patient from keeping the management plan of diabetes mellitus II (Giani 2017). There is essence when subscribing to quantitative methodology, and it is essential because it provides extensive options for managing the potential factors and ensuring patients keep the management plan. That is the insight gotten from the friend's post.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Offer and opinion

In offer and opinion, I support the opinion of quantitative and qualitative methodology. When quantitative methods are employed in the process of identifying potential variables that hold patients from keeping the management plan, it would be easy to locate the cause of the same (Pecorelli 2017). Even though we should be cautious of the potential variables, the fact that the qualitative method should be included is ideal. A qualitative approach is suitable because it helps us reflect our experience of the subject. The opinion is right because, without a precise and most outstanding method, we would not be able to know the primary cause of why patients do not keep the management plan for the diabetes mellitus II.

Suggestion, validation and probing the question

My suggestion vastly focuses on the type of the method used in most of the researches. I suggest that the qualitative method should be used instead of quantitative in this post. The quantitative method gives this post only immense factors instead of the causing factor. The qualitative method drives this post to a probing question. What facilitates the existing of these factors or what bring about these factors?

Assignment 2

Insight

On the second section of the post, the insight I get from it is the importance of choosing a research method based on how better it answers the research question. The more and better a research question is selected, the more likely we are to get answers we seek from research conduct (Schwartz 2018). In the scenario, the patient's behaviors are facilitated by various things. Some of the regulations of how patients' behave towards the management plan of the diabetes mellitus II is based on age, education level, and sex. The insight got from this post is that patients' age, sex, and education is ideal in variables that alter samples adherence or non-adherence behaviors.

Offer and opinion

In my opinion, the second post immense tried to assess potential variable but, do not focus on the quality of the research method. The quality of the research method is ideal for refining cause of the emerging variables that hinders samples from keeping management plan of diabetes mellitus II. The post is excellent but majorly focus in describing the importance a useful method in research. The qualitative method should be included in the research method to know an immediate cause of variable other than just knowing these factors.

Suggestion, validation and probing the question

To validate an idea, the type of method used in any research is essential. The type of method used would tell the quality and reliability of research results. The post is valid because it seeks to explain the importance of selecting the kind of approach when dealing with various researches (Pereira 2017). On suggestion and probing question, I would like to suggest that qualitative methods should be included in the identification of these variables, this is because of it overs a vast experience of the subject.

Assignment 3

Insight

The third assignment offers broader and broad spectrum of ideas. The post not only focuses on the demographic cause but also on the treatment method and effective result as the cause of variable amongst behavior of samples (Rovner 2018). The patient adherence to drugs also serves on the reason why there is the existence of these variables in treatment management plan. The insight is also based on the fact that there are those patients who are financially disadvantaged. The finances could be the cause of the existing variables, and the purpose might facilitate patient behavior towards adherence or non-adherence.

Opinion

I support the idea in the third assessment. It is true that you can predict the adherer but, should not be by health. The prediction of either a patient has adherence or non-adherences is based on what you see. The opinion is ideal because you can identify who is financially disadvantaged and as a result sample might be limited from accessing health services. You cannot tell the adherer basing on the natural side of the person or sample.

Probing question and suggestion

To validate the idea, it is a valid one because of its focuses on identifying the potential variables that hinder samples from keeping the management plan for the diabetes mellitus II. The selection is important of the methods used in the research like in this case, quantitative and qualitative methods are used (Lee 2017). This offers the reliability of the results depicted from research.

I suggest that the research should seek to evaluate the primary cause of the variables. When investigations vastly identify the cause of variables, it is easy to manage and these variable. I should also suggest that this post should include education as one of the reasons for the existence of variables. The probing question here is, what the leading potential variable that facilitates non-adherence behavior in samples?

References

Giani, E., Snelgrove, R., Volkening, L. K., & Laffel, L. M. (2017). Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) adherence in youth with type 1 diabetes: associations with biomedical and psychosocial variables. Journal of diabetes science and technology, 11(3), 476-483.

Pecorelli, N., Hershorn, O., Baldini, G., Fiore, J. F., Stein, B. L., Liberman, A. S., ... & Feldman, L. S. (2017). Impact of adherence to care pathway interventions on recovery following bowel resection within an established enhanced recovery program. Surgical endoscopy, 31(4), 1760-1771.

Schwartz, C. E., Grover, S. A., Powell, V. E., Noguera, A., Mah, J. K., Mar, S., ... & Gorman, M. (2018). Risk factors for non-adherence to disease-modifying therapy in pediatric multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis Journal, 24(2), 175-185.

Pereira, M. G., Pedras, S., Ferreira, G., & Machado, J. C. (2017). Family and Couple Variables Regarding Adherence in Type 2 Diabetes Patients in the Initial Stages of the Disease. Journal of marital and family therapy.

Rovner, B. W., & Casten, R. J. (2018). Health Beliefs and Medication Adherence in Black Patients with Diabetes and Mild Cognitive Impairment. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry.

Lee, P., Zehgeer, A., Ginsburg, G. S., McCracken, J., Keeton, C., Kendall, P. C., ... & Albano, A. M. (2017). Child and adolescent adherence with cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety: predictors and associations with outcomes. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 1-12.