Abortion: Should It Be Part of Typical Practices? - Essay Sample

Introduction

Does abortion have a place in society? Youths in the current community tend to involve themselves in abortions practice as the only available option to manage pregnancy. Since the act serves as the only option, various stands have emerged regarding its illegality, thus the ideal idea of ethical positions. Based on the presented ethical argument, the act of abortion should not be part of typical practices as it limits fetus chances of existing. The ethical argument again lies in the idea that no one holds the right to decide either a fetus should live or die. The ideas broadly explain how the act of abortion undermines the right to life. Abortion is again against societal moral stands, which support or offer the reason why I firmly believed the statute should not be encouraged. The essay paper broadly analyses ethical questions as a combination of initial two written assignments regarding moral stands about abortion by discussing ethical arguments, explanation, and defense as well as objection and response.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Ethical Argument

Abortion undermines the right to life and is against the moral principles of society. These two reasons present an essential section of the ethical argument covered in this assignment. Additionally, the task incorporates other ethical reasoning, which includes the act of endangering the life of the mother and fetus (Chiweshe 2019). In the case of a right to life, abortion undermines the right to life as it is a procedure that leads to pregnancy termination. The act undermines the right to life because a good number of countries have embraced the right to life. Treaties such as the United Nations hold rights of life, which is something against abortion practice in the region. Every individual is offered the chance to live, thus by practicing abortion; it undermines the right to life. In the same case, no individual holds a position to decide the right to life of the fetus.

In the case of a medical condition where the pregnancy endangers the life of a mother, abortion should not be considered undermining the right to life but instead as the only way that can save a mother's life. The argument presented in this section of the assignment tries to explain the essential approach under which we judge abortion. Unless the path to ethical principle governing abortion embraces the element of flexibility, the policy cannot provide a direct move and ethical dilemma covering the action in the region. The reason that leads to abortion again includes the most reliable answer to the moral question under discussion. This means by embracing complicating factors around abortion, the act holds a position in the society but should not be practised as a measure of contraceptive among youths across cultures.

The act of abortion takes two sides; thus, there are cases where the practice of abortion may be considered necessary. As earlier mentioned, in the case of medical procedures, which involves endangering the life of the mother. In the context where the mother experiences complications, the practice of abortion should be accepted. The concept explains the ideal idea that abortion holds no position in society except under critical conditions and decisions, which include medical procedures. Under medical circumstances with decisions generated by doctors, abortion must be done but holds no position in society.

Based on the moral theories, we have the idea of consequentialism, where the approach focuses on the consequences of the action. A version of consequentialism is utilitarianly covered in this section of the essay. The conclusion is drawn from theory revolving around implications that result from an action taken, which is broadly defined and explained in the case of abortion (Iqbal, Habib, & Amer 2019). The idea of moral philosophy covered under utilitarian puts the ethical argument regarding abortion in position. Society should judge abortion under the ideal notion of resulted consequences. The concept provides directions that will lead to an agreed argument revolving the controversial issue of abortion. If the judgment is made based on consequences brought by abortion, perception regarding the same will change in the region.

Deontology again presents the second section regarding moral theory addressed in this section of the essay. Deontology focuses broadly on moral rules or reason surrounding ethical issues in society and abortion in this case. The moral principle offers categorical imperative under two sections, sections one and two. The first section involves exponentially address or focus on the principle of universal law. The principle of universal law act by addressing two sides, which explains that people should act for reasons that serve as accepted for everyone in society. It forms an ideal section of the assignment and addresses the issue of abortion in the region. The moral just mentioned provides the best solution of the case, abortion. In circumstances where youths practice abortion without considering the life of unborn, the act does not involve moral ethics; hence have no position in society. In the case of medical procedure suggested by doctors, abortion appears to hold a have in society because the act addresses not only the decision made but also the life of the mother.

Explanation and Defense

Section of assignment covers explanation drawn from various theories, some of the earlier mentioned ideas in this section of the assignment. Consequentialism theory is one of the moral theories employed in this section to explain the ideal concept of right and wrong surrounding ethical issues, abortion. Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill were the protagonists behind the evolution of the paradigm of consequentialism (Fathalla 2019). They believed that decisions made by individuals should be based on their results, either good or bad. The theory immensely depends on the outcome, either if the result is wrong or right. The moral philosophy of consequentialism is ideal as it involves three essential sections of the issue necessary in handling the act of abortion. These sections or parts include ethical egoism, ethical altruism, and ethical utilitarianism. With the implications of this theory, consequentialism, it is easy to decide on the moral issue of abortion. Based on the suggestions covered in three sections of the assignment, abortion has no position in society because, despite choices made by an individual, it endangers the life of the mother carrying the pregnancy.

Defense of the ethical argument is based on the substantial value of the theory under discussion in this case. It involves either what the person does is good or bad to him, to people around him and in society at large. The idea of abortion has no place in society because the action is in the font of interfering with the life of the fetus. It broadly explains how the practice undermines the right to life and how it is against the morals of society in the region. Both sides tell why abortions have no place in society. In the case of utilitarianism, the act is bad for the person practicing.

Objection and Response

The point of objection and response about to be discussed fall under the circumstances where abortion comes with dangers that immensely involve mothers. Additionally, the position of objection extends to the reason medical providers advise to conduct abortion in the case of medical complications. I cannot entirely support opinions generated from theory discussed because there are cases where abortion is essential, especially under medical procedures regarding the mother carrying the baby. The objection to the topic broadly exists because of people's perspective, which lies in one direction or side. A good number of individuals in the society perceive abortion as an imminent evil practice, not recognizing that such an act may save lives of mothers endangered by the pregnancy. In the case of medical conditions such as mental disorders and other reasons, mothers carrying children with such conditions are in extreme danger and may not bring up a child or these children might end up dead. The ideal idea forms the reason for developed objection.

Response to objection developed above focuses on the proper side of abortion. Abortion may not be a bad practice where action is needed to save lives. It includes protecting the life of the mother carrying the unborn as a result of complications. In the case of other medical conditions such as mental illness, abortion ordered by the medical doctor should not be judged as other forms of evil acts. Listed reasons cover an essential section of response derived from personal objection.

Conclusion

To sum up, the introduction introduces an ethical question regarding abortion. In the case of an ethical argument, abortion has no place in society. The idea broadly explains moral theories such as utilitarianism and consequentialism, among other approaches. Abortion undermines the right to life. In the case of objection and response, the opposition is developed by focusing on the proper side of abortion, which includes saving the life of the endangered mother. Abortion ordered by a medical practitioner for the benefits of the mother should not be judged harshly as one of the wrong actions.

References

Chiweshe, M. (2019). Katie Watson, Scarlet A: The ethics, law and politics of ordinary abortion. Retrieved from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0959353519827326

Fathalla, M. F. (2019). Abortion and Public Health Ethics. In The Oxford Handbook of Public Health Ethics (p. 403). Oxford University Press, USA. Retrieved from: https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190245191.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780190245191-e-34

Iqbal, H., Habib, A., & Amer, S. (2019). Abortion-an Islamic perspective. Ethics, 2(1). Retrieved from: https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190245191.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780190245191-e-34