To Eat Meat or Not Essay Example

Meat forms a good dietary source of protein, minerals, and vitamins. Meat driven meal plans are not effectively considerate of the weight management requirement that relates to the body mass indexes. Although meat lovers refute the speculation that meat contributes to weight problems the delicacies that are more meat oriented have unhealthier eating habits that the counterparts eating vegetables or other foods only. Although, eating meat is very popular among different people, the Department of Health of the World Health Organization [WHO] states that eating too much meat on daily basis is unhealthy, stating that consumption of more than 90 grams of cooked weight of red or processed meat have serious health implication, stipulation a food intake cut-down to 70 grams (WHO 2017). During the evolutional phases, the Paleolithic ancestors did not eat meat, while they consumed tubers, grains, roots, fruits, or other foods gathered within their vicinity to survive. However, as human beings evolved their habits and dietary patterns changed and meat became an element in their daily intake when they started hunting. Eating meat, therefore, receive many speculations campaigning for or against its consumption. Animal-based diet is linked with many lifestyle diseases like heart disease, gout, high blood pressure, dementia, cancer, diabetes, and stroke among others. This paper, therefore, forms an argumentative basis on the double-sided perceptions of whether to eat meat or not.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

According to Westhoek, et al. human beings should not eat meat. The human diet does not only need to be healthy but also sustainable where they need to reduce the high level of livestock products consumed. Although meat and other animal products are a good source of bodybuilding nutrients, its more healthier to get these nutrient values from other sources and constitute our diet on grains, fruits, and vegetables. The methane produced by animal especially cow meat when taken in large quantities is harmful to the body compromising the overall wellbeing of the human body. Eating fruits, vegetables and grains have high immune system boosters, sharpen mental acuity, as well as decrease cell degradation thus discouraging eating meat because it refutes this effort to maintain a healthy body. Regardless of the human body's omnivores ability being able to digest meat eaten does not justify the consumption of meat in the body. We implicitly should not eat meat owing to the production system used in modern factory farming to produce meat using numerous artificial methods of instigation for growth, insemination, and quantity increasing profitability, compromising on quality. Finding from Smil states that animals suffer barbaric brutality to be converted into the meat making the process of producing meat inhumane to the rights of the animals. We should stop eating meat to put to an end the careless torture of killing innocent animals (Smil 2014). There are various concerns, feelings, attachments, and judgments that are religious, socially, and culturally views on eating meat or not in the daily human dietary. The medical consideration attribute to eating meat also says that most animal related products contain toxins that slow the metabolism process. The animals' body like the human body responds to external factors like pain, stress, unhappiness or physically causing them to experience chemical and hormonal imbalances due to the excretion that forms residues of toxic chemicals. After killing the animals, the torturous process ends up increasing the number of toxic depositions found in the meat added during the other process the meat passes through before it reaches its final consumption stage, like cleaning, packaging, and preservation. At certain times the meat reacts to added additives and preservatives causing minute toxic depositions that are harmful to the human body in a gradual process which eventually translate to health concerns.

Although pure health is not measured by the number of vegetables and other foods one eats besides meat, meat eaters are at higher risks of various health concerns than vegetarians. Another issue in the human body attributed to meat eating is weight management concerns. Heavy meat eaters are in taking very high compositions of carolers compositions that lead to weight management issues. Meat driven meal plans are not effectively considerate of the weight management requirement that relates to the body mass indexes (Westhoek, et al 298). Although meat lovers refute the speculation that meat contributes to weight problems the delicacies that are more meat oriented have unhealthier eating habits that the counterparts eating vegetables or other foods only. In the body fitness public campaign, animal-related products score very low considerations because of their budgetary implications. Animal products are an expensive category of food to be produced, unlike other foods. The meat-food production has limited options, unlike the other foods that are processed into different forms of simple foods making them budget friendly. Therefore it's convenient where the budgetary constraints are high to avoid eating meat and other animal products. Eating fruits, vegetables and grains have high immune system boosters, sharpen mental acuity, as well as decrease cell degradation thus discouraging eating meat because it refutes this effort to maintain a healthy body. Regardless of the human body's omnivores ability being able to digest meat eaten does not justify the consumption of meat in the body.

Digging into the history that shows how man began eating meat, initially it was out of necessity. These circumstances were because when the ancestor hominins hunted and eat animal meat when they migrated and could not find any other form of food, therefore, they started eating meat due to lack of choice. The ancestors were mainly forced out of their habitats by changing weather patterns and biomes in search of better-leaving habitats. This movement ended up placing them in places they could no longer gather fruits, grains, and vegetables so they opted for the only available option animal meat (Eating Better 2017). In the beginning, they ate the meat raw but after the discovery of fire, they started roosting and the smoking of the meat for consumption and preservation. Therefore, there is not much harm in eating meat if it dates back centuries ago. On the other hand, eating meat by human beings is justified by their positioning in the food chain. Human beings are omnivores by nature through evolutional development. Vegetarian should not be mandated to all people but rather an individualized choice. Protein from animal meat, on the other hand, when well-cooked offer a high level of bodybuilding nutrients, this is because we cannot only rely on plant protein. Although much argument has been presented to rule out the essence of stopping meat consumption, there is no solid reason to stop eating meat since there is no criminality ion killing and eating other animals. Again our digestive system is designed to handle meat digestion posing no warrant for its consumption into the human body.

Conclusion

In conclusion, eating the meat or not is a debate that evokes a lot of controversies showing it's positive and negative contribution to the human dietary needs. Some instances condemning meat consumption cite health implication among other socio-cultural beliefs that prohibit eating meat to save guard healthy living. Many aspects are raised showing the harm eating meat causes on the human body, primary among them being instigation of diseases like gout, cancer, and diabetes among others. There are wide arrays of issues that are cited to be caused by eating meat though there are opposing perceptions of these thoughts. The countering point of view perceives that no substantial evidence shows the harm of eating meat since meat is an evolutional dietary that dates back to the hominin era. Eating meat, on the other hand, does not the whole constitute to the perceived vices and man cannot rely on one type of food thus, requiring alternating different kinds of food like meat, vegetables, grains, and fruits without overreliance on one category. During the evolutional phases, the Paleolithic ancestors did not eat meat, while they consumed tubers, grains, roots, fruits, or other foods gathered within their vicinity to survive. However, as human beings evolved their habits and dietary patterns changed and meat became an element in their daily intake when they started hunting. Eating meat, therefore, receive many speculations campaigning for or against its consumption. Overdependence on meat is harmful to the human body, because despite the fact that the human digestive system being designed to digest meat human beings are not carnivores but omnivores in nature. Hence, too much-eating meat is poisonous.

Works cited

Eating Better, Less meat, more veg, 2017. http://bit.ly/EBblog130

Smil, V., Eating meat: Constants and changes. Global Food Security, 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. gfs.2014.06.001i

Westhoek, et al., Food choices health and environment: effects of cutting Europe's meat and dairy intake. Global Environmental Change, 2014, 26, pp 196-205. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.02.004

WHO, Guidelines on use of medically important antimicrobials in food-producing animals, 2017. http://www.who.int/foodsafety/areas_work/antimicrobial-resistance/cia_guidelines/en/