The United States Should Double the Number of Refugees That They Accept for Resettlement

Introduction

At the final months of 2016, the estimated number of world's total refugees was at "22 million according to the report by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR)." The estimates represented an escalation in the number of world's refugees by about one million compared to the previous year. From the estimates, only about 16 million refugees were under the obligation of the UNHCR. Thus, approximately 6 million are either unaccounted for or left to survive on their own. Considering the renewed conflict in Syria, it is worrying that the number might even increase further. The latest United Nations (UN) estimates show that Syria alone has an estimated 5.4 million refugees, most of whom have sought asylum in Europe. The UN released the report in December 2017. However, it is Turkey that has the highest number of refugee influx. Estimated at 3.8 million refugees, followed by Lebanon, Jordan, and Germany both accounting for approximately 4.1 million asylum seekers.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

That said, the United States, according to "the Migration and Refugee Act of 1962," has the mandate to cooperate with other bodies like the, "UNHCR, the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), the International Organization for Migration (IOM), and the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) among others." Together, they help offer security and aid to the expatriates, stateless persons, and the internally displaced persons (IDPs). The primary obligation of the U.S. is to ensure that the relief aid or any other form of humanitarian assistance reaches the intended destination. Apart from that, the United States helps in the monitoring of these programs. Still, this is not enough considering the current situation in Syria, Somalia, and Afghanistan. The United States needs to do more than just providing legal and physical protection to the refugees and securing the relief aid. For instance, the U.S.A should double its annual intake of refugees in the country to help resettle those refugees that may not be comfortable with their current hosts. Therefore, the primary objective of this essay is to defend the argument that the U.S. should double the number of refugees that they accept for resettlement. This paper debates on the issue under three main cases, that is, moral, economic and security perspectives.

Moral Perspective

The U.S. policymakers must counter the propaganda being spread by ISIS to prevent young Muslims from being turned into extremists. The group which has poised itself as the faithful guardians of Sunni Islam continues to threaten the dignity of human beings day by day. ISIS has already succeeded in sending their message to Europe through the 2015 Paris attack. The members of this terror group are notorious for raping young girls as well as forcing young boys to fight for them, which is morally wrong. Apart from that, these extremists continue to spread anti-western propaganda through footages showing drowning refugees and those being mistreated by their hosts. Still, this should not be an excuse by the government of the United States to limit its intake of refugees seeking resettlement. On the contrary, by helping these people, the U.S. will counter the false narratives being spread by the ISIS against the west. Also, it is not moral to send away people who are in desperate need of help. It is not their wish to flee their homes, but they did so because of unavoidable circumstances. They need a haven to raise their families.

That said, the geographical proximity between the United States and Syria puts the U.S. far from the crisis. Comparatively, the effort of the U.S. in placing the refugees is lower than that of Turkey, Lebanon or Germany. Even Iraq has hosted an estimated 230,000 refugees considering that ISIS also conducts acts of terror within the country. Besides, by the end of 2016, Germany had already resettled about 600,000 Syrian refugees. As of 2015, Saudi Arabia had a total of around 2.5 million estimated overstays. Despite the fact that the U.S has already spent an estimated amount of $4 billion in humanitarian assistance since the conflict broke out in 2011, about 1,680 refugees resettled by the United States is still lower compared to other global partners like Germany (Human Rights First, 2012). Even the France have agreed to relocate 30,000 immigrants. Apart from that, considering the high level of security in the US, the country is capable of providing sanctuary to more refugees considering that the current refugee limit is 45, 000 per fiscal year. Therefore, the Congress should table proposals that will ensure that they country resettles additional refugees, that is, double the current number.

Economic Perspective

In as much as critics will focus on the cost of relocating refugees as an excuse not to resettle them, we cannot afford to ignore the economic benefits that result from the process. For example, a report by the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) found out that the U.S. government spends about $15,000 in relocating refugees and another $92,000 in providing them with social welfare services for the first twenty years (Ignatieff, and Keeley J., et al., 2016). However, the report also found out that over the same period, these resettled refugees paid approximately $130,000 in taxes. In 2015 alone, about 181,400 refugee businesspersons residing in the U.S. generated $4.5 billion in business revenue (Mahi, 2007). Also, as entrepreneurs, they help to provide employment opportunities to others. Previous studies also dispute the argument that refugees will take jobs from American citizens, saying it is not true. The effect is negligible especially for a global economic power like the United States.

Moreover, these refugees can help to strengthen the workforce of the United States. For instance, the first refugee from Darfur, Sudan to get resettled in Alaska, U.S. is prospering both financially and psychologically. The refugee, At-Tahir Karief, who now works at the Anchorage airport in Alaska, arrived in the United States in 2008 from Ghana where he had lived in a refugee camp with his family for three years. Karief and his family were among the few who benefited from the resettlement program in 2008. Today, he loads and offloads cargo arriving at the Anchorage airport, Alaska. "I love it here. The people are friendly, and more so it is peaceful compared to Darfur," says Karief (UNHCR Projected Global Resettlement Needs 2011). His children also go to school and hopefully they too will finish their studies and get jobs.

Security Perspective

There exists a notion among many Americans that most Muslims are terrorists. This belief is vague and stereotypical. I am aware that there exist concerns that ISIS might use refugees as perpetrators of acts of terror in the host country especially after the November 2015 Paris shooting at Charlie Hebdo. Nevertheless, none of the shooters were identified as refugees but were found to be French, and Belgium citizens turned Islamist radicals. Also, research indicates that from a total of about 3.2 million refugees resettled in the U.S. from 1995 to 2015, only 20 were confirmed to be terrorists. The twenty account for a negligible portion of the total number. Only three of them conducted acts of terror within the United States, killing about three civilians and injuring a few more.

Apart from that, the United States of America has one of the most sophisticated but reliable vetting systems in the world. The vetting process of selecting refugees who are eligible for asylum in the U.S.A. is long and follows a series of procedures. For example, for one to qualify for resettlement, he or she must produce documents detailing one's nation of origin, medical records, certificate of proper conduct, and education certificates in case available. The interrogation is equally brutal. Therefore, it is highly impossible to accept a terrorist as the odds of him or her going past the vetting process are slim. Thus, by trusting in our vetting system, the U.S. can double the number of refugees that they accept for resettlement.

Conclusion

This essay attempted to defend the argument that the United States should double the number of refugees they guarantee relocation to the U.S. The first part of the paper highlights on the current refugee crisis in the world. According to the illustration given, the overall refugee population in the world today is at about 22 million. The argument mostly relates to the current situation in Syria where innocent civilians lose their lives on daily basis. The others who are lucky to escape death are seeking asylum in different nations. Currently, most European countries including Germany and the United Kingdom are taking in refugees from Syria. Nevertheless, their effort is not enough as the number continues to increase considering the renewed conflict between Syrian Forces and the Islamist States or the ISIS. In defending the argument, I have based the content regarding three sub-headings: morality, economy, and security. The moral perspective of the case considers the aspect of human dignity above other dynamics. The economic section highlights the financial impacts of resettling refugees into the United States. Lastly, the security perspective justifies the argument by rejecting the stereotypic belief that the resettled refugees can turn into terrorists.

Works Cited

Hoell, Dylan. "REFUGEES: FRIENDS OR FOES?."

"How to Repair the U.S. Asylum and Refugee Resettlement Systems-A Human Rights First Blueprint." Human Rights First, 2012, file:///C:/Users/OWNER/Downloads/asylum_blueprint.

Ignatieff, Michael, Keeley J., et al. "The Refugee and Migration Crisis: Proposals for Action, U.N. Summit 2016." Brookings Publishers, 2016. file:///C:/Users/OWNER/Downloads/fp_20160912_refugee_migration_crisis.

Mahi, Te. "Refugee Resettlement: A Literature Review." Department of Labor Journal, 2007. file:///C:/Users/OWNER/Downloads/resettlement . Accessed 8 March 2018.

"Proposed Refugee Admissions for Fiscal Year 2018: Report to the Congress." United States Departments of State, Homeland Security and Health and Human Services, 2017, file:///C:/Users/OWNER/Downloads/Refugee. Accessed on 3 March 2018.

Psychology Today. "Welcoming Refugees and Immigrants Is Good for the U.S." Psychology Today . n.d. Web. 1 Mar. 2018.

"The Future of Refugee Welcome in the U.S.: What's at Stake in 2018?" International Rescue Committee Journal, 2017. file:///C:/Users/OWNER/Downloads/policybriefthefutureofrefugeewelcome.pdf"

UNHCR Projected Global Resettlement Needs 2011." Resettlement Service Division of International Protection, June 2010, file:///C:/Users/OWNER/Downloads/4c31e3716.pdf.

"UNHCR Resettlement Handbook." Division of International Protection, Geneva, Revised edition July 2011, file:///C:/Users/OWNER/Downloads/46f7c0ee2.