Texas Governors Should Appoint State-Level Judges Essay

State level judges should be appointed by the governors and later be approval by the Senate to ensure efficient candidates are elected to this position. First, election of state-level judges through the ballot might lead rule of the majority in the court system which is in contrast to the rule of law. Secondly, the appointment of judges by the governors is based on thorough research and strict deliberation which focuses on background and records of the candidates as well as the level of experience in the judicial service. Finally, state-level judges elected by the citizens might lead to political advocacy which is undesired in the courtrooms. I support that the Texas government should focus on changing the selection of state-level judges.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Election of state-level judges through the ballot might lead rule of the majority in the court system which is in contrast to the rule of law. They may give a ruling in favor of the party that supported their election. Elected judges seek to make the partisan parties supported happy and normally act according to the majority in the jurisdiction (Iaryczower 230). However, judicial verdicts should be grounded on correct understanding and interpretation of the rule of law, and court rulings and judgments should never be prejudiced by civic opinion. Therefore, the appointment of state-level judges by the Texas governors will be the best approach to avoid such situation.

Appointment of judges by the governors is based on thorough research and strict deliberation which focuses on background and records of the candidates as well as the level of experience in the judicial service. In contrast, selection of judges through elections can be influenced by colorful advertisements for campaigns or the level of finance presented to the public. The selection is dissimilar to thorough research and careful deliberation by the governors in appointing judges. There are standards and requirements also set which state-level judges candidates are supposed to achieve for their appointment. Thus, these standards and requirements will thoroughly be more assessed if Texas governors are given the opportunity to appoint the state-level judges than if they are left to be elected through partisan parties.

State level judges elected by the citizens might lead to political advocacy which is undesired in the courtrooms. This may lead to denial of justice to those who vary in political parties that elected the judge. Rulings made by such state-level judges will be biased and in favor of the party supporters (Iaryczower 231). Conversely, the appointment of the judges by governors will focus on the entire record of the judge other than a candidate from a particular party. Judges should be appointed with an integral intention of being non-partisan and objective other than being elected to implement a specific party's platform (Lim 99). Therefore, the appointment of state judges by the governors is the best selection because most governors are neutral to the political views and perform for all individuals regardless of their political parties.

Conclusion

It has been observed that appointment of judges by Texas governors will assure unbiased and fair rulings in the court systems. It also allows the judges to make appropriate decisions following the law regardless of the public opinion and that of their partisan parties (Lim 100). The appointment by the governors is additionally trustworthy to produce efficient and qualified judges for the positions. Therefore, the appointment of judges by the governors and the approval by the Senate accomplishes the goal and purpose of the judicial branch which is to read and interpret laws to make just and fair rulings on all individuals regardless of their political parties.

Works Cited

Iaryczower, Matias, Garrett Lewis, and Matthew Shum. "To Elect or to Appoint? Bias, Information, and Responsiveness of Bureaucrats and Politicians." Journal of Public Economics 97 (2013): 230-244.

Lim, Claire SH. "Preferences and Incentives of Appointed and Elected Public Officials: Evidence from State Trial Court Judges." American Economic Review 103.4 (2013): 1360-97.