Ron D. Meyer v. Race City Classics Paper Example

In 2014, the North Carolina case between Ron D. Meyer and the City Classic was that a 1970 Ford Mustang advertised on the internet by the City Classic website did not reach the buyer in good condition. The Race City Classic Company which is located in the Iredell County broadcasted an item that belonged to Nebraska. Mr. Meyer, the owner, later called Thomas Alphin concerning the matter through phone calls and emails to inform him about the car he was selling. Upon agreement, both parties decided to buy the car at $21,000. Mr. Meyer who was far sent the agreed amount to Mr. Alphin without even seeing the vehicle.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

After the purchase was complete, Mr. Meyer requested if the car could be imported to North Carolina. Mr. Alphine did as they talked and informed him of shipping. Mr. Alphin later sent another email to tell Mr. Meyer that there was a delay because the ship had lined up and that there was nothing he could do. When the vehicle was finally delivered, Mr. Meyer discovered that the car had paint issues and unless taken to the garage the Mustang could not be driven. Mr. Meyer became angry and demanded a refund which Mr. Alphin denied. This made Mr. Meyer report the case, and when Mr. Alphin was summoned to go to court, he never appeared.

One finding discovered by the North Carolina court was the legal implications as well as the actions and decisions to prevent future judgments. Jurisdiction, in this case, was one key factor discovered because it involved personal and mattered jurisdiction (Stephen, 2012). This is because the North Carolina and Nebraska courts reviewed the case. After both courts examined the evidence, the jurisdiction matter found that the plaintiff was in favor. The ruling was made based on the facts of residency, communication, and action as agreed by both parties.

The vital factors of this case were through the following outline; by demonstrating the background info through listing the parties involved, the implications, stating the legal issues, the final associated rulings, providing statutes per state and identification of the jurisdiction. For instance, by listing the decisions, choices and changes will be of help to limit the implications from recurring again. The essential facts as seen in this case revolve around the involvement of the jurisdiction (Stephen, 2012). For instance, the Race City Classic who is the seller is in North Carolina while Ron D. Meyer the buyer lived in Nebraska. When jurisdiction is applied, the courts asks typically two questions relating to subject matter and personal Jurisdiction (Mayer et al., 2015). The Nebraska court, in this case, favored the buyer (plaintiff) to be paid the amount of $8,942 because the Seller was a member of North Carolina. The defendant on hearing this had to file a motion with the court to get relief against foreign judgment since he was not a member of Nebraska and also because he lacked personal jurisdiction.

Due to the nature of Mr. Alphin's business, the seller's used his way of selling throughout the U.S was through the means of advertisements, multiple websites and personal communication to argue back his case. Another factor the defendant used was the mode of delivery exchange. For instance, Mr. Alphin took the responsibility of arranging for the shipment and accepted to complete the contract. Because of this, the Judge stated that Mr. Alphin should not have been hauled in the Nebraska court since when the car was of good quality when it was put it into shipping. The party has therefore taken a legal stake because of the outcome of the case.

The legal implications including the study terms were that it showed that the Plaintiff was never initiated but only had a conversation with the Defendant when the car was purchased. When the Plaintiff received the vehicle, he was not satisfied with the overall condition not as he agreed with the defendant. As a result, the Defendant refused to take back the car as well as refunding back the money to Mr. Meyer. This forced the Plaintiff to file a judgment against Mr. Alphin. The defendant who never went to court even after the allegations presented in court, the presiding judge saw the decision as default against Mr. Alphine for the cost of repairing the vehicle (Mayer et al., 2015). As a result, the Race City Racers (defendant) filed a motion for relief because he was a foreigner and lacked jurisdiction. The defendant who was never hauled into the Nebraska court never agreed with the quality and defective nature of the car.

The venue and the jurisdiction are decided upon the level of the State but under the evidence presented in the case. The origin of the lawsuit, in this case, is Nebraska, and that is why the case went in favor of the Plaintiff who was also Nebraska's citizen. The North Carolina court also got involved in the case because of Mr. Alphin the defendant and his residency. Other administrative guidelines and rulings that influenced the case included Johnnie's Garbage Services v, Bell Atl. Tricon Leasing Corporation. While the case had full faith and credit aspects in during judgment, it also had an agreement miss-presentation by the seller. The Burger King case, in this case, is used to show how their products were being sold in other areas without having the foreign jurisdiction thus making the judgment to be forcefully filed.

When the Race City Classics and Mr. Meyer's is analyzed, it was discovered that the defendant favor was wrong because of the condition of the car as received by the plaintiff. This is because the Race City Classics is a big seller in the U.S and so he should have been aware of the condition of the car as received by Mr. Meyer including the administrative, guidelines and laws. When an individual does not run the business as expected, the reputation tends to spoil. Through an explicit representation, the case concluded that the item sent by the City Classics was damaged before reaching Mr. Meyer. It is also regarded that the full credit should be paid based on Mr. Meyer's judgment. I fully support the favor of the plaintiff that he should be fully paid for the damages seen in the vehicle.

Conclusion

I would recommend that the current statutes, regulations, and laws should be similar to the issue of personal and matter jurisdiction. After analyzing and reviewing the case, including the outcome, for example, I firmly state that the judgment and rulings were fairly done because both parties' side was deemed appropriate. The suggestion I would make to the Race City Classic is that while signing their contract, the client should sign against receiving their goods in the condition they see because of transportation faults. In case such cases arise again, the jurisdiction play an essential role in decision making.

References

Mayer, D., Warner, D., Siedel, G., and Lieberman, J. (2015). Retrieved October 25, 2018, from http://scholar.flatworldknowledge.com/books/25283/mayer_1.0-00pref-chpr/read

Ron D. Meyer v. Race City Classics, LLC, North Carolina Court of Appeals, 13 CVD 1255, July 29, 2014, at the North Carolina Court System.

Stephen, T. O. (2012). An Examination of the Implication of the Jurisdiction of International Criminal Court Over Non-State Parties. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2266559