Research Paper on Cognition, Human Behaviour & Brain Psychology

Introduction

Cognition in human behavior and brain psychology is one of the aspects that determine the social action and responsibilities they possess. The social cognition, therefore, generates the relationship between the neural function with corresponding human behavior. It is a process through which the brain processes information that portrays or results in a given outcome of the behavior and code of conduct. Cognitive psychology links up the human brain with the ability to remember, language delivery, attention, critical thinking, and finally, building consciousness. The main objective of the paper is to investigate and link up brain cognitivism concerning human behavior. Also, the paper aims or focus on the generating correlative analysis study on the different techniques used in experimenting with psychological cognitivism based on laboratory experiment and field experiment.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Research Problem

The paper seeks to examine and find out how different behavior actions are interrelated to the neuroscience effect with corresponding human behavior and attractions. Secondly, what are various factors leading to human cognitivism, that is, attention, consciousness, memory, language, and own perceptions of the activities around? The research question, therefore, provides an insight into information processing in an individual's brain as well as thinking capacity to demonstrate the proper decision making and judgmental action taking (McCaffrey, 2012). Different people have different cognitive abilities, and they respond differently towards distinct issues presented to them. In different psychology, scholars show that the neuro structures and responsiveness of the brain cells and hormones react differently in various people. Secondly, scholars argue that human behavior and cognitivism is influenced by peers and people around one. However, the correlation between the neuroscience and human psychology is not fully extracted to express the cognition in human behavior and actions ("Experimental Research Methods in Psychology - Embedded Content - Films On Demand", 2020). The information processing, therefore, induces a great challenge that has to define the relationship between the biological system of the brain and human consciousness instilled by external factors.

The Hypothesis of Understanding Experiments in Cognition

Basically, the neuroscience cognition has a direct impact on human behavior, perception, and therefore, there is some change in consciousness and attention development. Generally, the information processing of the brain is one of the detailed analyses that connect the psychological cognition and also the outcome projected from the neuroimaging. Language development, as well as communication habits, create an interpretation of the self-cognition that is depicted to the others. Perhaps, the hypothesis test seeks to induce the ecology validity in the experimental of psychological cognition.

The most crucial variables are dependent variables and independent variables. The independent variables include the subjects on which the study extracts the information. The subject is constant, and therefore different responses and analyses depend on them. The dependent variable project an interpretation of the information processing through the independent variables such as image and subject attractions, thus leading the cognition understanding of the subject.

Characteristics of Research Participants

The participants involved in the research include the researcher who happens to be students in a psychology class. While respondents are from two categories, that is a restaurant and bar club. The following are distinct characteristics of the participants.

• They are more open in field research and also more natural
• Field research respondents engaged themselves in visual and body movement expression providing more compelling information on cognition psychology.
• The researcher in a laboratory experiment is more confined to the ecological state that is constant on image presentation that does not change in emotion. Therefore their cognition, smile, attention, and consciousness remain static.
• The participant in a field experiment on the cognition tends to be more influential in creating or instilling the responsiveness of attention and information processing regarding attest the question in dialogue.
• The respondents in field experiments offer diverse and variety of the results depending on their cognition diversities.
• Field participants, at times, are biased in their answers since they always want to look good to the strangers.

Findings of the Research Cognition Experiments

The laboratory experiment is a compliment of the field experiment that in one way or another offer the answers to the psychological cognition with responding to the different nature of the tests. The evidence tracking offers a versatile analysis that is comparatively extracted from the experiments. Based on neuroscience research on human brain information processing, laboratory examination provide evidence that shows corresponding information that is unbiased based on the imaging and the observations closely magnified for a quality experiment ("Experimental Research Methods in Psychology - Embedded Content - Films On Demand", 2020). Laboratory experiment provides or sets the foundation of the recognition research to a link between the attraction influence and the scientific evidence on the brain as well as cell imaging variations. The field experiment, therefore, provides the real-life analogy of cognition. Various reaction and the language development is well analyzed while at the same time, the physical attraction creates the attentional and consciousness nature automatically to the observant.

Regarding the neuroscience cognition process and human behavior cognition, is mainly described in both laboratory experiment and field experiment. The lab experiment thus leads to an examination of the imaging components that connect to psychological perception. The field research experiment helps the researcher to articulate the changes that are bound to lead to visual and natural life hence able to analyze cognition ability.

Weaknesses and Strengths of the Study

Weaknesses

The study does not decode the biological reaction of the human towards psychological cognition. It mainly dwells on the visual analysis that does not provide enough evidence. The study project biased results that can never be proved based on the reality of the biased participants and the ones that are not biased. It is, therefore, hard to establish the best experimental method that provides valid information. Laboratory investigation provides invalid ecology, and thus result in the analysis is not best to examine cognitivism. However, its results are not biased and are more accurate (Taylor & Howes, 2004). Lab experiments also have less information on the data, and therefore the analysis is shallow. Field experiment provides biased information as most of the participants generally tries their best to build their image reputation to the researcher, thus offering want that looks good rather than accurate information.

Strengths

Through the incorporation of both experimental procedures, evident information can be gathered as well as the collection of a wide range of data. The field experiment enables the researcher to capture real-life truth that is coherent and of concrete meaning concerning psychological cognition. Secondly, the field research method allows the explorer to analyze similar conditions to different respondents that lead to a comparative reaction, language development, and attention and memory cognition in ("Understanding psychology"). The field study is more natural and offers the best experience in human behavior and the development of perception.

Conclusion

In conclusion, both experimental methods, lab, and field, provide information that is necessary for the analysis of the psychological cognition. However, the field experiment is quite reliable compared to the lab experiment as it provides a natural experience and a wide range of data through different respondents or participants. It is therefore advisable to use more of the field experiment extensively compared to the lab for best results on psychological cognition.

References

[Series episode]. In Understanding psychology. Retrieved from https://fod.infobase.com/OnDemandEmbed.aspx?token=40123&wID=100753&plt=FOD&loid=0&w=640&h=480&fWidth=660&fHeight=530

Experimental Research Methods in Psychology - Embedded Content - Films On Demand. (2020). Retrieved from https://fod.infobase.com/OnDemandEmbed.aspx?token=40123&wID=100753&plt=FOD&loid=0&w=640&h=480&fWidth=660&fHeight=530)

McCaffrey, T. (2012). Innovation relies on the obscure: A key to overcoming the classic problem of functional fixedness. Psychological Science, 23(3), 215-218. DOI:10.1177/0956797611429580

Taylor, S. (Writer & Producer), & Howes, S. (Producer). (2004). Experimental research methods in psychology (https://fod.infobase.com/OnDemandEmbed.aspx?token=40123&wID=100753&plt=FOD&loid=0&w=640&h=480&fWidth=660&fHeight=530)