Persuasive Paper on Labor Outsourcing

Introduction

The solution to the problems created by job outsourcing by local organizations to other companies with no employees' unions or government labor regulations is the United States to establish a body that regulates the operations of companies and individuals involved. The body's mandate will be to create laws that should be strictly followed by parties involved in job outsourcing. The regulations will require the companies to seek a permit from the government to engage in outsourcing and file the details of the employees including their salaries. The body will establish a minimum wage and indicate the safety measures that should ensure before starting the business operations. This solution will have advantages to both the locals and the target employees in the countries with fewer labor regulations.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Establishment of this government body will help in improving social justice to countries with fewer regulations on the labor market. Potrafke (2013) states that when the focus of government intervention is on developing the wages of the employees and general working conditions, then it can be regarded necessary. In most cases, companies tend to outsource labor in countries where the cost is low (Li, 2014). In this case, it is possible that the employees experience unfair treatment by their employers. The intervention of the United States government will ensure that the multinational companies give equal treatment to employees in other regions. The response will also possibly encourage the local government to ensure that foreign investors do not exploit the citizens by strengthening its local labor laws.

The first advantage of this intervention will be the protection of human rights for the target employees. By drafting some laws, the United States will direct the organizations on how to treat the employees thus protecting them. In situations where the company sources labor in developing countries, Dietrich and winters(2014) argue that it may cause an impression of a failed government thus undermining its operations. The drafted laws should, therefore, enable consultations with the countries involved. The situation means that some aspects of the regulations should be left open to allow the companies adopt the labor laws used in that country. Consultations will enable the United States to avoid collisions with the other government but show an act of support to improve the living standards of the people.

Through the establishment of a minimum wage, the United States will help the local government to achieve the international working standards. Good salaries by these companies will encourage the local investors to increase their wages to meet the market price and ensure employee retention. The success of business organizations relies heavily on their ability to retain employees and keep enhancing innate talents. Upholding of human rights by American organizations operating in foreign countries on their employees will help educate the country's workforce on their rights and therefore encourage the local governments to improve on the same (Dietrich & Winters, 2015). Such a development will result in the establishment of the of more measures of strengthening human rights in developing countries as encouraged by Herod and Lambert (2016). Employees regardless of their geographical locations require equal treatment.

The second advantage will be increased jobs for the locals. The establishment of this government body will limit the number of companies able to source for employees from other regions. The regulations will, therefore, encourage the companies to employ locals to meet their labor demands. With the provision of more job opportunities to the locals, the economy of the United States will continue to grow and therefore enhance growth and development. Though there have been arguments on the decrease in manufacturing costs due to foreign employment outsourcing, local employment is bound to have more positive and direct impacts on Americans' lives.

The increased industrialization activities in the United States have attracted large numbers of people from all over the world in search of jobs. With labor outsourcing, local organizations create job opportunities in foreign countries leaving behind more jobless people in the nation (Li, 2014). The rate of population growth in the state demands that the government to continue encouraging local investment. Such an intervention is essential in maintaining low unemployment levels among the American population. Through government regulations, more companies will continue to employ local labor in all sectors. The rules will give the investors the impression of sourcing foreign labor is more expensive than using local employees.

The intervention will enable the government to earn more revenue through income and corporate tax. Employment of locals will grant the government an opportunity to collect more revenue from the employees as well as increased production. The higher the income of the companies, the higher the amount of taxes they pay and therefore raising the revenue collected by the company. Li (2014) argues that this intervention helps the government save more funds that are used for development and to improve equitable economic growth. Taxes collected by the government are used to run the government and provide improved services to the people such as improvement of healthcare and education services and facilities.

Labor outsourcing reduces the amount of revenue earned by the Local government while improving that of foreign countries. The situation means that local organizations promote international economic growth rather than that of their own countries. Such a case may result to slowed economic development in the United States. Through this intervention too, the living standards of the people in America will be improved, an indicator used in global measuring a nation's level of development by evaluating the well-being of its citizens.

Conclusion

From the above discussion, it is evident that government intervention is necessary to help curb the problem of foreign labor outsourcing. The advantages indicate that the United States stands a chance to benefit more from the intervention through continued local investment. The established government body will help in ensuring smooth business operations within and outside the country by locally established organizations. It will also assist in improving the global perception of the United States and its people as a nation that focuses on enhancing social justice and the general well-being of all people.

The global changes in the business sectors associated with the increased labor outsourcing. In their work, Herod and Lambert (2016) state that nations that have strong protections for the employees do not encourage contingent working. Globalization has led to increases in contract, part-time and temporary working conditions (Potrafke, 2013). It enables the organizations only to hire workers for specific tasks and a duration. Such developments explain the increased use of labor from countries with no strong regulations on the labor sector. The United States keeps a close eye on the labor market ensuring that all employees are efficiently protected and are aware of their rights. The protections turn off organizations in need of contingent workers. To promote local industrialization, the regulations created by the governing body to establish should accommodate this new development.

References

Dietrich, S., &Winters, M. S. (2015). Foreign aid and government legitimacy. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 2(2), 164-171.

Herod, A., & Lambert, R. (2016). Neoliberalism, precarious work and remaking the geography of global capitalism.Neoliberal Capitalism and Precarious Work: Ethnographies of Accommodation and Resistance, 1-42.

Li, S. (2014). Economic structure, cost outsourcing,and global imbalances. The Journal of Australian Political Economy, (74), 81.

Potrafke, N. (2013). Globalization and labor market institutions: International empirical evidence. Journal of Comparative Economics, 41(3), 829-842.