Paper Sample on Tom Cruise's Minority Report: Futuristic Crime-Fighting Technology

Introduction

Tom Cruise's film 'Minority Report' is an American film produced in 2002 in Washington D.C. and northern Virginia. It is a futuristic science fiction film centered on a technological invention that is supposed to have been created for the detection of crime by 2054. The invention is used by the 'precrime' police force, with the aid of three physicists named 'precogs' to achieve foreknowledge of the future crimes and thereby apprehend the offenders before they execute the crimes. This technology has the potential to look to the future and thus provide reliable foreknowledge to aid in the detection of crime. The Cruise's character becomes traumatic when the viewing technology forecasts his involvement in a potential crime of murdering a stranger, which ignites his urge to investigate what will lead him to commit a crime and how he might help deter it from happening. Cruise is serving as a detective with the 'precrime' police force in the year 2054 when this technology will be used. In the film, thriller, science fiction styles, tech noir, whodunit, and traditional chase film are all well combined in implementation. It is made up of complex scenarios of murder plots and mysteries in which visual technology is incorporated. In this film, Cruise accused of preventing potential killings re-imagined by three "precogs." Cruise is the main character in this film and allows us as an audience to realize that there is a barely visible distinction between good and evil.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Relation to Free will and Determinism

Various themes are evident throughout the film from the start till the end, with the prominent issues being the philosophical debate of free will and Determinism. Where the potential for free will that exists in the future is established and known, it is examined in depth using various scenarios. Other minor concerns include the possible legitimacy of the error-free prosecutor, the role of the government to protect its people, the media's role in an ever-growing and ever-changing technological environment, and the impact of crimes on communities. The issue of free will is portrayed in the film following its manifestation. Free will is the capability of an individual to choose possible alternative actions. Only decisions taken under a free will are worth benefit or liability. Traditionally, possessing free will is thought to entail two things: self-control and alternate possibilities. It exists where there are laws and morals so that an individual can freely do what is right or lawful even though he/she also has the freedom to choose to do what is immoral or illegal. Within this film, the concept of free will, which is one of the most articulated themes present, is described as the ability to make decisions where past experiences have little impact on the outcome. This is again compared to the concept of Determinism, in which there are no alternative courses of action, and there is only one choice that an individual has no option but to choose. Free will and Determinism cannot coincide because one can only occur in the total absence of the other. The primary investigation raised by the film concerns whether the future is fixed or can be altered through democracy.

Conclusion

Considering all knowledge of free will and Determinism, I believe that decision-making variables and decisions affect human actions. Individuals have unquestionably free will, which can be used to make life decisions. Human judgment and human activities cannot be determined solely in the event of free will. Also, society has universal laws and principles that are reflected in most schools of religion and philosophy. Individuals should use these ethical principles and guidelines to determine if their activities comply with moral standards and norms. Psychologists who consider the free will say that Determinism removes rights and dignity and undermines human conduct. Through establishing general behavioral rules, deterministic psychology underrates the individuality of human beings and their right to choose their future. Many who can limit such contentions must convey the challenge of demonstrating that the conduct of specific persons can be resolved as autonomous decisions, but not as pre-ordained ones.