Non-Criminalized Social Deviance Essay

Criminology entails perpetration of social and federal justice. Although, the state law stands in to enhance social norm against harmful human conduct, not all harmful behavior qualify for criminalization. Not all harmful behaviors pass for criminal prosecution because though they are regarded distasteful socially, they are legally considered harmless. Therefore, sociological perspective passes for the viability of the sentiment that "all crimes are deviant but not all deviance is criminal". Some of the non-criminal deviance conducts include substance abuse, pornography watching, emotional manipulation, rude talks, lying, arrogance, or achievement boasting among others especially when perpetrated by key members of the community like state officials. This paper will discuss some socially regarded harmful behaviors that are not criminalized perpetrated by state officials showing the disproportionate victim and beneficiaries of such conduct. It will also determine how non-criminalization of certain social deviance helps to support systems of domination.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Certain individuals with anti-social behavior seem to be jovial, hyperactive, attractive, confident or even charming due to their sociopath characteristics. Sociopaths are capable of manipulating and cruelty among the people they are interacting with. Sociopathy entails individuals failing to abide by societal norms and cannot keep healthy companionship with family, friends or colleagues. Sociopaths possess strong predominant traits that fail to qualify for criminal acts under judicial perspectives, though socially the individuals are endangering. The probability of living with individuals with harmful conduct places their subordinates at risks of discrimination, harassment or exposure to violence (Boyd & Carter, 2014). State officials with certain deviant behavior endanger their juniors or even family members. Though, some social deviance has not criminalized the extent of harming their conduct can cause to the victims and also the perpetrator's life is significantly huge. For instance, when a senior state official develops substance abuse he or she cannot be considered to have violated any tangible laws for criminality. However, their conduct and overdependence on certain substance are considered socially unacceptable. In the societal perspective they pose endangering to the people they associate with especially their family or subordinates. Not all substances that end up being abused like alcohol are considered in the eyes of criminal legislation to be illegal. Therefore, their mild use as refreshment is socially acceptable with no cause of alarm but, ones an individual gets over dependent and misuses certain substances social concerns arise more than any offense would stand.

In other instances, superior members of the society could be accused of emotional manipulation of their subordinates or other members of the community with vulnerability tendencies or fragile traits. Although, nothing criminal would qualify in legislative justice in the scenario, socially its condemnable with the harshest terms to think of the harm that would emerge from emotional leading. At certain times its ignored but the harm is still evidence and has social impacts more on the victim than the perpetrator. According to Kramar (2011), in cases where a male boss would lead to a female subordination with emotional manipulation, the subject would pass for non-criminalization. The reasons for non-crimination are because of the patriarchal nature of the majority of global communities where women will ignore certain emotional manipulation to avoid embarrassment. Many people with sociopathy disorder are assumed with popularity from their charm leading to intense social problems and higher level deviance which eventually pave way for criminal acts. Waiting until things get out of hand due to ignored or underlooked harmful actions because people who perpetrate the acts are the same people responsible to protect the dominance of sociopaths in the lives of innocent vulnerability.

Contrary, criminalization of every aspect that is considered deviance would bring more harm than good to the society. Many people believe that in every wrongdoing needs to be answerable and accountable for the mistakes and harm caused. It's quite tedious for the legal support services to offer a suitable and timely response to every minor deviance in the society. From a sociological point of view sociopathy as a major part of non-criminalized social deviance requires more suitable solution than facing prosecution or any other legal implication accorded to criminality. Social deviance contributes largely to the oppression of weak and vulnerable members of the society. Acts of humiliation and other diminishing acts are subjected to people objective to sociopaths because no legal abides by their cause of conduct or have definite definition in the courts (McFarland & Blackwell, 2013). Therefore the oppressed remain insubordinate to the dominance of their wrongdoers. The simple tendency of saying one is sorry when the harm is already done given little or no solution to the already caused harm.

Sinha (2013), states that the sociological acceptance of social deviance attribute to personality and value for human life. Whether anything that happens in interpersonal or intrapersonal relationships is moral, culturally, legally, or politically right or wrong it's the duty of every member of the community to be sensitive and considerate to their peers. Ensuring that we are mindful of other people's conduct or importance in life it's appropriate to ensure that we don't wait to ride on the criminality or non-criminality of our treatment of others especially when they are our junior or we have whatever advantage over them. Government officials are the upholders, preservers, examples, and restorers of the social norm of conduct to play as the role models to the community they lead due to the significant role they play in ensuring law and order.

Conclusion

In conclusion, it's essential to distinguish the relationship between social deviance and criminal activities in the society. All people especially the ones with higher positions in social status need to put into account the wellbeing of all the other people by treating others with self-consciousness, fairness, and sensitivity not to do what we wouldn't want to be done to us.

References

Boyd, Susan & Carter, Connie.(2014). Killer Weed: Marijuana Grow Ops, Media, and Justice. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Kramar, Kirsten. 2011. Criminology: Critical Canadian Perspectives. Toronto: Pearson.

McFarland, Janet, & Blackwell, Richard. (2013). "Three former Nortel executives found not guilty of fraud." Globe and Mail. Jan. 14. Retrieved May 10th 2018, from http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/industry-news/the-law-page/three-former-nortel-executives-found-not-guilty-of-fraud/article7319241/

Sinha, Maire. (2013). "Measuring violence against women: Statistical trends." Statistics Canada Juristat Article no. 85-002-X. Retrieved, May 10th 2018, from http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/85-002-x/2013001/article/11766-eng.pdf