Mental Health Transformed: New Breakthroughs in Treatments & Insurance - Essay Sample

Introduction

It is critical to comprehend that over recent decades, the process of mental health has experienced tremendous shifts. Control also passed from physicians to health insurance companies and pharmaceutical manufacturers. Traditional plans for health insurance have all but disappeared and are replaced by more' efficient.' Breakthroughs in drug companies have also emerged so that most mental disorders can now be handled with medication and not only with psychotherapy. In this way, it is usually given first in the form of a drug when mental health care is received these days (Bruns, 2007). However, treatment has developed a barrier to treat mental illnesses. A skilled, licensed physician who knows mental health issues (a psychiatrist) should prescribe psychiatric medicines in a natural world with limitless resources. The modern-day healthcare industry is not entirely ethical, so doctors are not almost enough to satisfy demand. Across rural regions in the US, the lack of qualified physicians is particularly acute. This paper will summarize the full range of concerns that are centred around psychologists prescribing.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

There are two different groups of professionals in this context, psychologists and therapists, who could fit the topic in context. Registered doctors definitely should administer psychological medications, but they cannot treat mental illness as more than just a side effect because of the need for general medical care. By comparison with psychiatrists, they are specialists in mental diseases, but frequently do not administer them, irrespective of how well they are qualified to do so, as they are not professionals. Psychologists have significance if they are appropriately trained and approved to do so to be able to prescribe psychological medication. Psychologists usually have specialized clinical training for five or more years in mental health diagnosis and care, a psychiatric residency of one year and 2000 hour (a year) under observation, before they can be trained individually (Bruns, 2007).

Psychologists are already frequently working with clinical medications (many clients are there, and they have to learn which drugs to use to do a good job). In most cases, psychologists are in a better position to know when adjustments are required than psychiatrists; they see their patients more than once a month (with psychotherapy) while psychiatrists are glad to see a given patient six times a year (Kapalka, 2011). Another thing to keep in mind is that creating medical medications is not rocket science (even if it involves a thorough course of study, professional care, certification and continuing education to be adequately and appropriately done). Reception is usually not an art of development, but a process of understanding standard dosages, reactions with medications, side-effects, and how accidents can be treated.

Only a restricted subgroup of medicinal products related to their work will receive psychologist's prescription privileges; they will not be certified to surgical procedure or such things as these. It is only fair that psychiatry and referral roles can be tucked into one career in order to accomplish substantial savings on cost (Lavoie & Barone, 2006). Moreover, significant cost savings will be made-because psychologists are ready to work for less as compared to psychiatrists. The psychological profession has been in an identity crisis for some time. Psychiatrist in the 1940s provided psychotherapy and psychology as a clinical field did not exist. Psychiatry started moving away from psychotherapy during the fifties, sixties and seventies (partly because the dominant Freudian school of thinking produced no results and partly because new psychiatric medications introduced during those decades).

Clinical Psychology has evolved into and is suitably used to handle psychotherapy. Nevertheless, the improved regulation of the treatment system and the subsequent introduction of new, ever more effective therapeutic drugs in the 1980s and 1990s resulted in fewer psychotherapy resources and less access to care (Sowell et al., 2008). At the same period, a large number of Masters (led by Social Work) professionals have decided to become psychotherapists-social workers were prepared to work for even less income than psychologists. Nevertheless, now, therapy is trapped between medicine and social work (standard treatment) and battling for the surface. Psychologists have a way to go, among other things, by drug access.

Most psychologists do not like this new law. That goes without saying. Any medication ground acquired by psychologists is seen to be a loss for psychiatrists. Nevertheless, it is capital that governs America's day, and not the honour of the community. When psychiatrists succeed in maintaining their territory, they will have to tell those with the influence that for motives more significant than they do not want to get fewer earnings, they battle prescribing rights for psychologists. Most interestingly maybe, many psychologists reject psychologists ' prescribing rights. The reasoning against the rights of medication of Psychiatry is usually similar:' Psychologists are specialists in psychotherapy (Bunis, 2010). When we follow the path of prescribing entitlement, "we will surrender this knowledge and become nothing more than junior doctors. Generally, either senior therapists who have already finished pension plans and have children at school or scholars who have an investment in an idea of knowledgeable purity argue for this reasoning.

Psychotherapy was the primary source of diagnosis as exclusive rehabilitation, (in some situations part of treatment) and medication. Psychologists are stupid as clinicians not to seek knowledge as clinical prescriber and ultimately harmful to those represented by psychologists who merit the highest and most comprehensive treatment that our stressful healthcare system can provide. In the ongoing debate, several individuals, even psychologist do not understand this concept and the issues it presents to the healthcare industry. Many psychologists are not willing or indifferent to the issue to speak out against the Prescription Privileges (RxP) movement. For years the psychotropic medications prescribed for their consumers have been monitored and managed informally. It seems logical to psychologists to learn the effects of medicines on their behaviour and how to help or prevent the progress of psychosocial therapy (Lavoie & Barone, 2006). However, further training, in addition to simply understanding the effects of the medicines, would be required in order to prescribe. There appears to be heated debate between those who endorse this and those who do not recognize prescribing privileges of therapists over the consequences for prescriptive jurisdiction.

Conclusion

Conclusively, to date, clinical psychologists have largely failed to discuss their opinions on the presumption to redress. Given that this category of psychologists typically deals more closely with pharmacy consultants than most other professional groups of psychology, the consequences of prescribing rights may seem peculiar to this community. The American Medical Association (AMA) still does have a specific policy to prevent therapists from accessing prescribing services. Is prescription suitable for psychologists? On the one side, psychologists will have access to many various mental health services, notably in poorly served or rural areas where doctors are weak because they enable themselves to prescribe medicine for mental illness. By addition, medical training required to prescribe medicines may be insufficient for psychologists. Some argue that medical training and training achieved in a medical college and residence is crucial for administering medicines and forecasting negative results or intricacies successfully. While the RxP law is proponent's reaction to other prescription non-medical practitioners such as podiatrists, dentists, and nurses, they all have college, and university degrees concentrated on medical background lessons, whereas most psychologists do not.

Reference

Bruns, D. (2007). Evidence-based medicine, the biopsychosocial model and prescription privileges for psychologists. PsycEXTRA Dataset. doi:10.1037/e626012012-002

Bunis, M. S. (2010). Prescription Privileges: A Survey of Prescribing Psychologists.

Kapalka, G. M. (2011). Pediatricians and Pharmacologically Trained Psychologists: Practitioner's Guide to Collaborative Treatment. Berlin, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media.

Lavoie, K. L., & Barone, S. (2006). Prescription Privileges for Psychologists. CNS Drugs, 20(1), 51-66. doi:10.2165/00023210-200620010-00005

Sowell, M. M., Kahn, D., Youngman, A., Lawrence, K., Rae, W., & Jensen-Doss, A. (2008). Prescription Privileges for Psychologists: Views of Pediatricians and Pediatric Psychologists. PsycEXTRA Dataset. doi:10.1037/e520502008-001