Legalization of Human Organs Sale - Essay Sample

Introduction

One among the most live saving clinical procedure is organ transplant. Some organs dysfunctional like end-stage kidney disease have a better option with a transplant than undergoing dialysis. Organ donors could be living or deceased but donation organs are experiencing high shortage throughout the world especially because of the rise of lifestyle diseases that lead to organ failure or dysfunction (Chang, et al. 1699). For instance, organ disparity in the United States is experiencing a long waiting list for kidney beneficiaries waiting for any available donors. These challenges have seen other people argue whether it is necessary to purchase the organs as a possible solution. Logically, a majority of the countries globally do not authorize the sale of organs by donors. However, the implausibility of the legalization of selling and buying human organs is not morally permissible due to the complexity of the organs market leads to a black market offering the sale and purchase of human organs from donors to beneficiaries with organ failure or functionality concerns. This paper will conduct an opposing argument on the legalization of the sale and buying of human internal organs posing possible ethical and moral challenges that would manifest in the market after the legalization of organ market.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

The innovation of a black market for human organ has already led to ethical misery. The World Health Organization have in recent years estimated over ten thousand black market vendors selling different human organs to desperate recipients due to the long waiting list at medical facilities looking out for any available donations. The authenticity of organ acquisition in the black market is highly unethical because at some desperate cases where the organ donor is vulnerable to uncouth cartels will suffer psychological and physical harm at the expense of the monetary value attached to the process. Therefore, considering the scenario of the situations in some instances legalizing the sale and purchase of human organs would give way to butcheries acts in the society. Organ dealers with only monetary gain concern will go at high heights to deceive the ignorant public in the acquisition of donor organs for sale (Chang et al 1700). Thus, it is not ethical to legalize the sale of human organs even before we are able to deal with the impacts of the black markets existing in the world.

In the United States, organ sale is not legalized because the public is sensitized through numerous platforms of the need for free organ donation, especially during fatal accidents. The awareness has gone a long way to increase the number of donor organs for the patients in the waiting list for organ transplants. Other countries like Bangladeshi, Colombia, and India with a high rate of organ sellers have contributed to rampant cases of organ failure than the healthy non-donors due to the marginalization of postoperative care of the vendor in this illegal trade (Mendoza 378). Kidney sale lacks proper protective strategies for the vendor as opposed to the recipient; hence legalization of organ market would increase the rate of organ failure concerns among the healthy nations where the vendor is not properly taken care of on the post-operation healing process. It is, therefore, naive to assume that legalization of organ market would ease the regulation of organ sale and scale down on illicit trade but regulatory structures would need high sophistication to ensure that the market is morally authentic.

The moral argument against the legalization of organ market draws a hypothesis that monetary incentives offered to blood donors do not totally deal with the blood shortage in the world's health facilities. Lack of the moral virtues governing organ donation in exchange for the financial interests refrains the otherwise potential donors who are morally obligated to donate their organs to needy recipients. The moral virtue of the then commercialized donation practice would change the whole idea of ensuring that different donors are available for organ shortages in the health facilities. Following the morality of the exercise legalization of an organ, the market does not clearly define how effective the regulation strategies would apply to ensure social responsibility and economic implication especially on the poor. Through the legalization of organ sale and purchase ethically unacceptable practices would increase the exploitation of the poor in the justification of getting them to engage in organ vending.

Although various legislation in the USA and beyond dictates against the sale of a human organ, black markets have taken center stage in ensuring that short-cuts are created to loophole the long donation waiting list. There is no need for legislative law to authorize the sale of human organs because the already put in place Task Force on Organ Procurement and Transplantation have made considerable efforts in regulating the organ donors and organ receivers to ensure ethical and moral responsibility in the practices. The benefits of the current systems are in a better position in handling the situation thus prohibiting organ sale and purchase is essential because their legalization would only lead to chaotic results in the systems (Mendoza 261). The religious responsibilities of most groups of the world are in favor of organ donation as an effort for life preservation and saving showing the safest and uncontroversial systems in organ donation that would otherwise be contributed by organ market in the ways utilized for people to exchange organs and money. Speculations are wild on the incidences on an illegal system that would emerge once organ sale was legalized. Religious condemnation fears that there would be an increase in the number of homicides and other serial killer cases in the bid to make money out of organ sale.

The crime rate associated with organ sale increases the cons of the business ideology than the pros that would be attributed to organ sale legalization. The negativities attributed to the legalization of the organs market suffers more controversial effects outweighing any possible benefits associated with the trade. Hence legalization of the practice would negatively affect social security as opposed to the number of lives saved in the long run (Ambagtsheer & Weimar 573). At all social expenses, organ sale should remain illegal because of the social responsibility attributed to poor vendor poor recipient. Maintaining the illegalization policy n organ sale allows organ receivers to be considered in order of priority rather than financial capability. Lack of organ market helps to streamline the donation systems in order of priority where every patient is considered on an equal scale for all social status. It is not possible to regulate the donation waiting list when the monetary ability of different recipients of internal human organs in favor of others without the financial ability to purchase the limited available organs. Through illegalization of the organ market health facilitators have been able to determine without biasness the order of priority based on the patients' needs rather than other external implication. Thus its viable to not that legalization of organ sale would contribute to emence incidences of corruption and dehumanizing violation of human rights especially due to the social-economic implication of the donor and the receiver (Territo 59). The organ market is unique in its own peculiar way hence legalizing this sensitive trade would be a game changer in the viability models of many social and economic situations in the society.

Although much condemnation of organ trade has taken the center stage of the debate, it is worthwhile noting the possible benefits that would save lives when an individual suffering organ failure of dysfunction has a willing vendor and is in the capacity of buying the organ its alright for the concerned parties when an agreement is due. Much interference and dictation of the procedure to be followed at such desperate situations attributed to organ dysfunction one need to find a better option to their solution. Instead of having capable buyers having to rely only on the black market to supply donation organs that are mainly needed urgently legalization of organ market would go a long way in safeguarding the welfare of the donor and the recipient. Therefore, the practice should not receive total condemnation but should be lenient for viable models to ensure population safety is enhanced at all times.

Conclusion

In conclusion, arguing for or against legalization of human organ market takes different standpoints in the measure of the pros and cons attributed to the practices for social morality and professional ethics in ensuring free and fair treatment for all. The marginalized should not suffer at the expense of those within the capacity to purchase donor organs but, their rights have limitations to the moral and ethical obligations for all stakeholders to safeguard all parties' interests.

Works Cited

Ambagtsheer, F. & Weimar, W. "A Criminological Perspective: Why Prohibition of Organ Trade Is Not Effective and How the Declaration of Istanbul Can Move Forward". American Journal of Transplantation. 2011, 12 (3): 571-75.

Chang, N. K.; Gu, J.; Gu, S.; Osorio, R. W.; Concepcion, W.; Gu, E. "Arterial Flow Regulator Enables Transplantation and Growth of Human Fetal Kidneys in Rats". American Journal of Transplantation. 2015, 15 (6): 1692-1700. ISSN 1600-6135.

Mendoza, Roger Lee "Colombia's organ trade: Evidence from Bogota and Medellin". Journal of Public Health. 2010a, 18 (4): 375-84. doi:10.1007/s10389-010-0320-3

Mendoza, Roger Lee "Kidney black markets and legal transplants: Are they opposite sides of the same coin?". Health Policy. 2010b, 94 (3): 255-65.

Territo, Leonard. The International Trafficking of Human Organs: A Multidisciplinary Perspective. Hoboken: CRC Press 2011.