Labor Disputes on Jet Airways

Communication is fundamental to the prosperity of any organization; the dynamic operations of the business make communication a vital part of it, without which an organization is anticipated to fail. In the labor dispute case study, communication has been viewed as one of the aspects that led to the confrontation between the Jet Airways and their workers. Jet Airways was faced with another labor dispute soon after concluding the retrenchment fiasco that was ended with the reinstatement of the sacked workers (Bamber et.al, 2013). In the latest labour dispute, the young pilots became insecure of seeing the previous event where National Aviation Guild was established on the 24th July 2009; where the Regional Labor Commissioner registered it.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Two senior pilots were relieved from their duties on the July 31st 2009. The two were the office-bearers of NAG, and they were dismissed by a single mail that stated their services were no longer required by the organization, and therefore they were terminated from their work, and there were no reasons stated. The pilots were alleged of coercing the other aviation members to form the union (Vivek, 2009). The NAG organization then invited the management to discuss the representation, whereby it had felt on the deaf ears. The NAG fought back by issuing a strike notice on the August 2009.

Sartor Data, the Executive Director at Jet Airways, stated that the reason that prompted to the sucking was based on the disciplinary matters and their lawyers dully consulted them before coming up to the decision of sacking the pilots. Then the pilots decided to take a mass leave without making further attempts to initiate talks with the management, consequently, what was followed was a huge loss that was incurred by the airline. According to the Joint Secretary of NAG, Mr. Thomas, he reflected the matter stating that they management owes some explanation to the sacked workers on what was the factor that led to their abrupt sacking. By not mentioning that they are in a strike, Thomas defended the pilots by saying that they were within the law (Vivek, 2009).

According to the labor laws on the matter concerning the management of Jet Airline and the workers, the right to establish a Union is important to any socialist state (India being one of them), and sections from the constitution it has also incorporated the Trade Union Act, 1926 & Industrial Dispute Act 1947. The important point is that it applied the phrase 'employee' instead of 'workmen.' The management acquired the order from the Bombay High Court using the sections 22 Ana 23 AT ten Insularly Delouses Act limiting ten ANA Trot stroking (Bamber et.al, 2013). Additionally, because the issue was still pending before the Labor Commissioner, it was ordered that the looming dispute is resolved through that medium the soonest.

The negotiated ended with the establishment of the grievance committee constituting of both the administration members as well as the pilots who are obliged with the task of hearing the case, all working under the Central Labor Commission.

Conclusion

The NAG officials withdrew the strike on the evening of September 7th, 2009. At last, the draft was prepared by the pilots' representative, Congress leader Sanjay Nirupam and the Jet Airways Chairman Naresh Goyal. The management settled on reinstating the sacked pilots with the condition that it would go back over the insight of the union.

References

Bamber, G. J., Gittell, J. H., Kochan, T. A., & Von Nordenflycht, A. (2013). Up in the air: How airlines can improve performance by engaging their employees. Cornell University Press.

Vivek, M. V. (2009). Jet Airways' labour dispute: Trade unions and India's labour conundrum.