Heart Failure Dyadic Self-Care Interventions: Components, Contexts, Outcomes - Essay Sample

Buck, H., Stromberg, A., Chung, M., Donovan, K., Harkness, K., & Howard, A. et al. (2018). A systematic review of heart failure dyadic self-care interventions focusing on intervention components, contexts, and outcomes. International Journal Of Nursing Studies, 77, 232-242. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.10.007

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

A systemic review of heart failure dyadic self-care interventions focusing on interventions of components, contexts, and outcomes describes various classes or categories of intervention that best suits patient self-care improvements. The review follows the introduction of multiple approaches that support the patient with heart failure to avoid salt dietaries, which aims at improving patient outcomes in the context of self-management. The review introduces different methods of interventions which separate and explains the basis of interventions, as well as, mechanism and strategies each intervention operates on to better the outcome of patient self-care. Some of the main introduced interventions components actively include staff training, face-to-face education with the relevant authorities with a healthcare setting, and weakly interactive voices. The systemic review once more focuses on various interventions of physical contexts such as hospitals and clinical research centers. Interventions components and physical contexts provide the basis of improved intervention outcomes where patients are provided with essential information that enhances an entire self-care approach. Staff training within the hospitals provides a platform where patients are advised adequately and improve patients' preparedness to enhance an overall process of patient-self-care.

Jiang, Y., Shorey, S., Seah, B., Chan, W., Tam, W., & Wang, W. (2018). The effectiveness of psychological interventions on self-care, psychological, and health outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure-A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal Of Nursing Studies, 78, 16-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.08.006

Effectiveness of Psychological Self-Care

A second systemic review outlines the efficacy of psychological interventions on self-care, psychological, and health outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure as connected to patients' health problems. The review involved a systemic approach to evaluated randomized trials that employed clinical and psychological methods. Emulations focused on self-care patients' behaviors, depression levels, and anxieties, as well as various categories of physical functions. The approach involves elements of effective sudsy that reflect on an excellent systemic reviews' method. The strategy employed within the system Revie advanced to the examination of non-published electronic data such as CINHAL, among other essential areas of interest that defines the quality of the self-care addressed. Each step of the method shared within the text actively provides useful information about psychological interventions. Result obtained from the research indicates that psychological interventions play essential roles in enhancing patient care across healthcare institutions. Interventions plans of short-term plan unveil or predicts a positive outcome of the patient care especial for patients with heart failure conditions within the healthcare system.

Shafipour, V., Karami Salahodinkolah, M., Ganji, J., Hasani Moghadam, S., Jafari, H., & Salari, S. (2020). Educational intervention for improving self-care behaviors in patients with heart failure: A narrative review. Journal Of Nursing And Midwifery Sciences, 7(1), 60. doi: 10.4103/jnms.jnms_19_19

An article review here focuses on interventions for improving self-care behaviors of patients with heart failure; it involves a narrative of educational interventions across the whole text. Some of the central intervention plans that actively consists of the enhancement of self-care patients include face-to-face interventions just as what has been covered over in the review system, home visions obtained via phone calls, group training, and E-learning as part of approaches that significantly enhances the whole scenario. The plan once more extends to home visitation by a follow up of the phone call. Each systemic approach or intervention sheds light on the responsibilities of enlightening the basis where the daily methods of patients towards the adherence of medication would be enhanced. Face to face intervention introduce approaches of healthcare training that seek to improve self-care of patients suffering from heart failure conditions across the healthcare system as connected to enhanced self-care health.

Intervention approach of the specified system review provides another intervention approach that enhances the whole process of self-care among patients who suffer from various cardiac conditions, including heart failure as one of the conditions (Santesso et al., 2020). Apart from face to face intervention, another approach of intervention includes group training, which the system review introduces in the context of enhancing self-care for a patient with heart failure as the health problem which covered over here. Group intervention focuses on a method where a group of interaction is purely made of patients. The intention follows an approach of sharing information among members of a given group, information is specified on enhancements of self-care approaches which seek to improve health conditions patient with heart failures across the healthcare settings.

Justification of Selected Articles

Systemic Review of Dyadic-care

Justification approaches of articles selected follow a given pattern where the strengths and qualities of the articles are determined. Justification also examines the contribution such materials make to clinical intervention and the whole concept of self-care towards the management of patient conditions. The first article is a systematic review that involves a review of heart failure dyadic self-care interventions, which focus on interventions components, context, and outcomes. It includes strengths such as risk analysis where critical appraisal skills program criteria are employed. A review of risk within any method of data collection, in most cases, increases the accuracy of information converged within texts. The article follows the same, which explains its strength. The article exploits quality assurance steps such as the use of standardized protocols of interests, frequent and regular team management, and eligibility confirmation at each step. Each approach covered over here significantly explains the strength of the article towards a point of review.

The quality of the first research article explains the various approaches used when the review was done, the sample size of the research, and several citations within the text. Papers examined within the text actively demonstrates the level of accuracy employed in the article of interest. Screened papers follow a specific pattern that reflects the level of accuracy of the text in connection to the research method at hand. Patient conditions used in this specific systemic review include hearth failure as the medical condition of interest and appropriate interventions that help enhance conditions.

Effectiveness of Psychological Interventions

The systemic review of the efficacy of the psychological intervention on self-care involves specific strengths of a specific study. Some of the strengths of the research include methods used, such as randomized controlled trials that employ psychological methods or theories (Peachey et al., 2020). Dimension psychological techniques on self-care behaviors, anxiety, and levels of depression actively describe the strength of the systemic review article, which explains the basis and strengths of the psychological techniques. The number of articles that gathered the results of the systemic review describes the strength of the study.

Quality of the specified systemic review with psychological interventions follows numbers of articles reviews and studies, as well as, number of participants. The higher the number of materials used in the systemic review paper, the higher the chances of an increased systemic review. Additionally, an increased number of published articles used alongside the systemic review explains the nature and degree of quality of the systemic review on psychological interventions (Burton et al., 2020). The size of several participants employed across the systemic review where psychological approaches have been employed suggests the variety of the article and strategies of interventions on self-care as much as psychological theory is concerned. Some of the conditions which have been used in the specified systemic review include anxiety and depression. These conditions explain chronic related health conditions that have been fully covered and discussed in the study.

Educational Intervention

Educational intervention enhances the self-care behaviors of individuals within the whole review. It involves patients with heart failures, and the quality of the article has been involved in the number of articles of systemic review. Three hundred forty different articles were used in the systemic review to cover every essential information needed to cover educational interventions that seek to enhance self-care behaviors of patients with heart failures (Vesterlund et al., 2020). Various educational intervention plans such as groups help patients who suffer from chronic heart failure learn the basis of self-care as much as the condition at hand is concerned. A large sample size of participants who actively formed part of the review explains what the quality of the article entails (Baxendale & Hook 2020). The approach seems to help numerous clinical settings where patients and healthcare provides are provided with techniques of enhancing patient awareness of matters related to heart failures. Patient condition used in research follows heart or cardiac failure as the condition where the systemic review increases patient knowledge of the same.

Recommendations

Recommendations of interventions within a clinical setting can be improved right from healthcare providers to patient knowledge of medical conditions (Della Corte et al., 2020). Improvement intervention that will help the organization to enhance patient care include clinical governance where systemic approaches are promoted. Systemic activities may play an important part, which enhances patient care as several internal and external audits of an organization are made to improve patient care and professional involvement (Gachabayov et al., 2020). The clinical governance aids organization on critical occasions where professional education and development is experienced within a healthcare institution as connected to patient care and management of specific infections. Clinical governance once more aids clinical researches and developments where an organization actively promotes its clinical technique to invent new approaches such as patient management of personal chronic diseases. It provides the basis where patient care is enhanced.

Reference

Baxendale, E., & Hook, A. (2020). Systematic reviews should not be assumed to be systematic and comprehensive. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 117, 156-157. https://systematicreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles

Burton, E., Farrier, K., Lewin, G., Petrich, M., Boyle, E., & Hill, K. D. (2020). Are interventions effective in improving the ability of older adults to rise from the floor independently? A mixed-method systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation, 42(6), 743-753. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30512983

Della Corte, L., Saccone, G., Locci, M., Carbone, L., Raffone, A., Giampaolino, P., ... & Zullo, F. (2020). Tranexamic acid for tr...