Exploring the Clovis Culture: Origin, Exploitation, and Growth - Free Essay

In conjunction with the artifact analysis and initial research integration analysis and scrutiny of its exhibition of the sudden exploitation of African-linked artifacts in Canada undertaken in the previous assessments, as one of the most preeminent Clovis cultures ever known in the Canadian historical arena (Moratto 37). This essay critically expounds further on the understanding of Clovis culture, its origin, and all the facets that maintain it progressive up growth together with its manifestation of the code of conduct that provides a proper connection to the archeological dwellers.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

According to the current studies, there is the existence of new adventuring Clovis facets stating from 12,000calB.P up to 11,500 calB.P, which is precarious for better comprehension of Clovis Culture as one of the Canadian Pleistocene. According to the current shreds of evidence, it confirms the appearance of the Clovis Pleistocene remains the same as before, which makes it to have a higher Paleolithic toolkit, which moved from central Asian to East of Siberian and finally landed to northern America. During the migration time, intermixing among various cultures was experienced, which results in the development of new and predominant Pleistocene in the western part of America that ranged from 13,000 to 12,500 calB.P.

Out of the discovered bands, some were moved to South America from Alaska via a full hallway that exists in the declining glaciers. It was at this time that the invention of the corrugated projectile point was undertaken. It was also accompanied by the production dates of scrappers, bones from animals, and dowels made from ivory. As a result of these Clovis facets, it brings about constant meetings and interaction of the original owners of these sites that later paved the way in the rapid growth of the Clovis culture in Canadian soil (Uhl). However, this is in contrary to the archeologists' work which has not entirely determined the actual Clovis locations in Alaska or even in Canada, which left many people in suspense questioning themselves series of question that has no elaborate answers.

According to recent archeological findings, the Clovis and Solitarians individuals were involved in the ivory smelting work in designing their tools in different shapes and styles with the incorporation of distinct scrappers made from stones. The low concentration of Clovis in North America as a result of lack of enough evidence on the resemblances of the Clovis tools that are said to have been in these sites. It is further proven by the archaeological beliefs that stated the Clovis people temporarily stayed at Siberia before dispersing to other parts of America.

Clovis tool mechanisms were very susceptible and weak, light, and moveable since people were always moving from one place to another and for the compatibility of their tools, and they needed to have mobile tools. Due to mobility reasons, their stones tools were made from weightless, valuable, and small-grained stuns, which looked very strange as compared to the known jewelry that has been in existence since time memorial (Uhl). It, in turn, increases its popularity for many years, championing the progressive growth of Clovis culture. The utmost renowned, famous, and inimitable component of their device machinery was the grooved canister points (Uhl).

In considering their weights and the nature of the material used in the making, Clovis tools sum up the immediate and efficient remedy of acquiring them since they were being obtained several miles away from the central Canadian site. It vividly examines both macroscopic and microscopic properties of the elements used, thus making it a substitute for heavy metals such as iron, calcium, and lead pigments, which have been given hectic work in distinguishing them from metal flux (Moratto 39). Clovis artifacts are named in relation to their properties and their locality. The names used were Suwanee, which have a fish-like shape, Cumberland with distinctive neck, and Ohio named after its vicinity.

Ideally, physical artifacts like the types discussed above, which in most cases are human-made objects, often possess significant socio-cultural vitalities relating to the societies of concern (Zhou 90). The historical documentation of the events that surround the Africa-linked ornaments that are found in the Textile Museum of Canada, as done in the previous path analyses, depict a different originality theory, which circumnavigates around the culture and norms of African descent. For example, artifacts always considered to bear a plethora of vitalities and importance about rigorous contemplation of societal perceptions from different facets (Zhou). The ornaments, like the African-linked artifact, for example, reflect the ultimate anesthetic physique and taste of African society, universal values, and perspective motivations, in addition to specified rhetorical verdicts within a particular community culture.

When properly scrutinized and examined, the human-made ornamentations and decorations also express and depict a vast range of general human knowledge, experience, and skills interdependent to motivations, which in some cases, unanimously articulates with the norm or ambiguously inaccessible and unavailable in a reliable verbal discourse. In other words, through critical artifact analysis, ambiguous questions and frameworks regarding the ornament of concern are amicably addressed via exploration of cultural studies, general semiotics, relational material (ornamentations/paintings) rhetoric, and their respective structural designs, for instance. Artifacts like glass, leather, metal, fabric, pottery, stone, bone, etc., which are the most common ornamentations in most of the global museums and corresponding identity data attached to them often address questions like where it originated from, who used it and how or why they used it (Holt). Besides, expounding on their general makeups also examines what the ornaments were used for. Also, it illuminates the general views of the public on how the structural component of these ancient human-made objects correlates to the originality of whoever made them and how they achieved that (Holt). Furthermore, the incorporation of technological advancements amid archeological researches provide massive aid in getting accurate data about age, ornamental necessities, and significant correlated information concerning the anthropological findings.

Owing to contributions of technology in archeological and anthropological works, the decorated baton Perce and the African-linked ornament, which are found in Central Poland and the Canadian Textile Museum, respectively, ultimately provide reliable evidence of socioeconomic exchange in the Mesolithic societies. Precisely, artifacts, among other ornamental decorative objects and natural materials, implicitly offer a vivid insight into how the ancient civilizations exchanged prehistoric gifts. Most commonly, the gift exchange processes involved the transportation of primary raw materials like stone carvings for their various technological significances and different metal products that prevalently adorned graves.

Based on the structural elemental composition of the burton Perce, an artifact found in Golebiewo, Central Poland, the isotopic analysis conducted on it proved that it must have originated from antler, from an inevitably reindeer species mainly found in Northern Russia, and Scandinavia amid the early eras of early-Holocene (Holt). In so doing, dispersion analysis attests that this artifact object was probably transported from North Karelia and driven to Central Poland with reasons behind its transportation remaining a total subject of speculation.

On the other hand, the African-linked artifact found in the Canadian Textile Museum also has different assumptions on researchers of the background of its transportation to Canada (Killan 10). The shipping of this ornamentation to America remains a misery even to recent archeologists and anthropologists altogether. Still, the authors suggest that their respective outcomes were as a result of the continuous flow of goods and services between the different hunter-gatherer categories in the vast geographical locations across the globe.

Additionally, there have been divergent ideologies concerning the transformational changes in the studies of stone tool artifacts found in the Canadian Textile Museum. The tools seem to possess a clear picture of how Mesolithic hunters and gather mutually combated the ancient extreme climatic changes, which altered their ways of life amid that century. Comparative analyses of these ornamentations show the establishment of transitional hunting projectiles, as seen from the Museum, based on the inevitable concept of territoriality, an exponentially changing weather and climate in general (Donsbach and Donsbach). It is believed that, amid the rise of sea levels, migration of animals, increased drought, and famine, just as seen in the modern world, among other severe environmental changes, human manipulated the structures of their microliths such as stone arrowheads and barbs that were exclusively used for animal hunting.

Building on the archeological findings derived from the last three decades, Crombe examined the microliths using Bayesian modeling, which universally aided in the research that resulted in a revelation of potential correlations between the sequential changes in the raw materials or artifacts. For instance, the results dated the Mesolithic sites to the North Sea basin and their different physical shapes to Central and North Africa, as a crescent and triangular-shaped microliths, are linked to Egypt's origin and descent. The Egyptian culture and norms of designation and development of pyramids are ultimately reliant on triangular and trapezoidal shapes found at these museums and historical sites, respectively.

Comparative analysis of the periodical transitional model inevitably shows significant variations in the size, color, structure, and shape of the artifacts. The new ornaments are seen to appear more complex in shape when compared to the previous pre-found artefactual stone tools (Lee 45). These variations in stone tool shapes hypothetically define that their correlated development was based on distinctive activities that existed between different generational groups that are believed to have lived along the Egyptian coastlines, Central Africa, and the North Sea basin. Owing to the profound structural variations, the groups had geographically distinct cultures and societal norms within their respective regions of residence. Critical artifact analysis, therefore, is of a plethora of significance, as it also enlightens the researcher and readers on the regular activities in every culture concerning a particular ornament or artifact.

According to Crombie, the global rise in sea levels forced former occupants of the North Sea basin, for instance, to new areas, which was also accompanied by increased levels of resource competition and populational stress eventually escalated the sense of territoriality, including the development and designation of more sophisticated stone tools and equipment over time. Furthermore, it is also believed that the advanced stone tools are linked to the short but severe climatic transitions, while the pyramid-shaped tools are associated with the inevitable abrupt global cooling effect amid early Mesolithic as a result of massive erosions and redundant wildfires.

As the years went by, the artifacts’ structures further changed and coincided with the bladelets that retouched microliths with newer complicated trapezoidal-shaped arrowheads. As compared to the museum, it is believed and affirmed that the latest version of these stone t...