Essay Sample on Power Five Conferences: Autonomy from NCAA?

Introduction

The issues of the autonomy of the power five conferences from the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) has been long raging. The debate of why the Power Five Conferences should remain under the NCAA legislation while they themselves have the resources abilities and a legal set up to create their own governing body is one of the most coherent debates in American sports (Santesteban & Leffler, 2017). For instance, there has been a general feeling among sportsmen, sport analytics and critics that NCAA is less efficient in the management of athletic programs of major universities around the U.S. Furthermore, there are concerns that the frameworks of NCAA profit the organization and undeserving people by taking advantage of students who devote their time into sports (Wanless & Stinson, 2019). Despite these allegations, the benefits that the Power Five Conference received from NCAA cannot justify their desire to form their own governing body.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Recruiting Gap

Already, there is an existing gap, and the split will not make it any better. Power five schools already have the muscle power and programs to offer their students additional money. This a resource other program does not have (Santesteban & Leffler, 2017). Therefore, autonomy in legislation means the power of five organizations will set governing bodies that will set legislation that apply to them. This will only benefit recruits here.

Unnecessary Competitive Space

Before the split of both governing bodies, there are issues. Such issues include revenue sharing, scheduling, and recruitment models. Under NCAA, these issues can be solved collectively, and the organization will seek to set a fairground for each member (Wanless & Stinson, 2019). Under the different governing bodies, each body will focus on setting systems and models that work for them. This will only cause a further gap that could unstable the American sporting system.

Could Attract Further Splits from NCAA

Previously, there have been concerns that sports cannot survive without NCA laws and systems. Prior attempts from NCAA, members to change rules have bounced back on them and forces them to call on a reexamination of proposals. One such rule, is the 2013 rules that the NCAA put in place to deregulate recruiting practices (Santesteban & Leffler, 2017). When the rules the seemed unenforceable were adopted, there were massive complain form top ten sports teams on their reexamination.

Changes will not be Significant

The same model issues, bureaucracy, and lack of consensus will remain when the conference builds a new governing body. Although it may seem like players will have a slightly wider choice or recruitment benefits, these benefits already exist under the NCAA. Therefore, the cost is not worth the returns.

NCAA Gives Power Five Greater Bargaining Ability

NCAA is an instrumental ally for Power Five Conferences by giving the participants more exceptional bargaining elements for airplay and advertisement deals, which are helpful in the sustenance of any Power Five Conferences activities. This means that Power Five Conferences stand to lose a significant amount of revenue if it splits from NCAA, which has persuasive and higher bargaining power (Klevorn, 2015).

References

Klevorn, D. M. (2015). Leveling the Playing Field: Increased Protection for NCAA Student-Athletes via Collective Bargaining. Michigan State University College of Law. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.law.msu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1249&context=king

Santesteban, C. J., & Leffler, K. B. (2017). Assessing the efficiency justifications for the NCAA player compensation restrictions. The Antitrust Bulletin, 62(1), 91-111. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0003603X16688838

Wanless, L., & Stinson, J. L. (2019). A Contemporary Functional Form for NCAA Division I FBS Contributions: Internal and External Considerations. Journal of Sport Management, 1(aop), 1-16. Retrieved from https://journals.humankinetics.com/view/journals/jsm/aop/article-10.1123-jsm.2019-0036.xml