Essay Sample on IT Standardization in the US

Introduction

The recommendations available for both the US and the European countries in dealing with the changes in the information technology sector involve the integration of the homeland security in both the countries. The application of the homeland security in these regions is aimed at the overall protection of the citizens in the countries covered by the same technology changes. To begin with, the standards of security in the US takes the form of partnership between the public and the private sector in a bid to try and come up with viable means to help curb any problems of cyber misuse and pilferage (Sayer & Morgan, 2018). Such partnerships would be used in the establishment of the standards used by the homeland security products and other processes gained in the overall momentum in action toward the terrorist attacks in the country and across the globe.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

The federal government in the US had to establish a brand new federal department called the DHS (Department of Homeland Security) to help curb the cases and menaces taking shape in the information and technology sector. The department was formed by bringing together the available resources and then realigning the same missions from over 20 separate agencies to have a focal thinking mentality from the federal government. These organizations were based on alignments toward the prevention of threats that could arise from the agents of chemical, nuclear, radiological, or biological explosives (Ashford, 2018). Other areas of concern included the transport, borders, infrastructure protection, information analysis, and the emergency response and preparedness. The primary aim of this development in the IT department was to help the curb the problems of border insecurity, cyber-crimes, immigration, recovery, response, preparedness, and the aspect of counterterrorism.

IT Standardization in the EU

The countries in the European region have agreed to use three standards in the organizations of the IT sector in these countries. These avenues include the CEN, ETSI, and the CENELEC. These agencies aim to foster the economic front of Europe within the global sphere of trading. They also aim at keeping watch on the welfare of their citizens alongside the environment. Through the services offered by the EU, a platform is made available for the development of the standards used in the EU and other technical specifications cross the bloc. CEN is the primary provider of the measures used in Europe and can provide guidelines used in the functional specificities of the information sector (Sayer & Morgan, 2018). The agency is the only one given the mandate to plan, draft, and adopt the overall standards used by the European countries. The countries use this gesture in their plight to help come up with the best practices in a wide berth.

The agency is governed by the General Assembly that controls its budget and provides for the vetting of the members of the board to help in managing the confidence and security levels in this organization in these countries. CEN has the responsibility of signing the technical cooperation agreement called the Vienna agreement that would be significant in the aligning the services of this organization to those of the ISO certifications across the world (Cath et al., 2018). The Dresden Agreement also provides for the right circumstances that need to be provided by the IEC to avoid any duplication of the roles of the boards in dealing with security matters in the information technology sector.

The analysis by the information security department in the European countries is focused on the overall security of the citizen that would encompass the issues of counterterrorism, organized crime, CBRN, explosives, and the problems linked to fire hazards. Other areas would include the infrastructure securities such as the design in buildings, supply chains, surveillance, and the energy and transport grids. Border security is also another significant issue to be checked while dealing with the relaying of information across the continent (Sayer & Morgan, 2018). The agencies are also concerned about the processes of restoring safety and security in cases of crisis by creating a well prepared, planned, active, and recovering agencies and boards in place.

The EU and US Collaboration on the IT Standardization

The joint committee among these two regions was coined based on the long history in the close relationship based on the profound interdependence and the shared values within the same states in a much-organized manner. The primary focus for the joint committees is based on the factors of information security standardizations. The collaboration had the mandate of ensuring development and the healthy exchange of the relevant and recommended standards, needs, assessments criteria, and interdependency analyses (Ashford, 2018). Other areas based on the organization of the personnel include the certifications, guidelines, data, equipment, software, optimum practices, test reports, and the proper training programs.

The collaboration was shaped by uniting the available assets and after that realigning similar mission from more than five isolate offices to have a central reasoning attitude from the government. These associations depended on arrangements toward the counteractive action of dangers that could emerge from the specialists of concoction, atomic, radiological, or organic explosives. Different zones of concern incorporated the vehicle, outskirts, foundation security, data investigation, and the crisis reaction and readiness (Cath et al., 2018). The primary point of this advancement in the IT division was to help the check the issues of outskirt frailty, digital violations, migration, recuperation, reaction, readiness, and the part of counterterrorism.

References

Ashford, N. (2018). Technology-Focused Regulatory Approaches for Encouraging Sustainable Industrial Transformations: Beyond green, beyond the dinosaurs, and beyond evolutionary theory.

Cath, C., Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2018). Artificial Intelligence and the 'Good Society': the US, EU, and UK approach. Science and engineering ethics, 24(2), 505-528.

Sayer, A., & Morgan, K. (2018). High technology industry and the international division of labour: The case of electronics. In The Development of High Technology Industries (pp. 10-36). Routledge.