Essay Example on Sports Injury: Acute and Overuse Injury Types

Introduction

Injury is a dominant issue that encounters each athlete (Ristolainen 2011). Sporting injury is the loss of the structure of the body or functioning, emanating from an isolated exposure to physical energy during sports training that is after assessment, it is diagnosed by a clinician by a medically acknowledged injury (Finch & Cook 2014). Acute and overuse injury constitute the two forms of sports injury (Patatoukas et al. 2011). The acute injuries entail the immediate, occurrence of an injury (Mueller-Wohlfahrt et al. 2013), caused by a certain event, including the breaking of an ankle after sliding tackle by an opponent during a football match (Brooks et al. 2006). The overuse injury explains a form of injury that is caused by repetitive microtrauma, with the source of the problem being unrecognizable. The physical aspects, including contact (Ivancic 2014), cause acute and overuse injuries. The notion of injury is often linked with negative emotions because the injury can end the career of an athlete (Evans et al. 2008). The physiological response is more vital than the psychological response initially whenever footballers break their ankles. It is demonstrated when the ankle of the footballers releases the chemicals triggering vasodilatation to happen to the injured part. After this, the ankle will swell because of the increased pressure and swelling on the nerves that cause too much pain. The inflammation will decrease, and the sports massage therapists start to repeat the physiological state of the footballer, whereby the psychological impact becomes more apparent. The sports therapists need to understand the physiological and psychological responses to sports injuries in the west of Scotland.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Psychological Responses

Many models and psychological responses to injury in a sport do exist. The -Stage grief response model (Baglione et al. 2018) and the Integrated Model of Response to Injury (Voelker et al. 2019) are the two renowned models to recognize the psychological response process that the athletes penetrate the post-injury. The 5-stage grief response model (Baglione et al. 2018) is grounded on a player encountering grief post-injury. Walker & Thatcher (2011) claims that the model has been used to explain the psychological responses to sports injury for years (Walker & Thatcher 2011). Also, Voelker et al. (2019) suggested the Integrated Model of Response to Sports Injury that included both cognitive appraisal and grief responses (Walker & Thatcher 2011). The model perceives injury as a dynamic process considering the situational and individual aspects based on rehabilitation adherence, whereas highlighting the emotional, cognitive, and behavioral responses to injury in a sport (Walker & Thatcher 2011). It is crucial to adhere to the rehabilitation program, whereby the processing time of recovery is increased (Baglione et al. 2018; Voelker et al. 2019). It is suggested that the two models will be more applicable to long term injuries because they deal with adherence to rehabilitation initiatives (Levy et al. 2009).

Psychological responses to injury entail the image of the body and the thoughts and emotions regarding their own body (Halliwell & Dittimar 2003). The athletes with serious injuries might suffer from athleticism loss (Cassidy 2006), where the athlete loses the definition of muscle and the potential of the skill during inactivity. Due to this, there will be an increase in anxiety before the return of a sport (Evans et al. 2006). The rising anxiety is linked with the worries of injuries for not being able to attain individual goals and incompetency (Podlog & Eklund 2007) and have a negative contributor to the performance of an athlete in sports. For instance, the purpose of a football player was to attain the equivalent standard of performance before the injury before entering a tackle with full commitment because of injury. In addition, frustration might happen (Walker & Thatcher 2011) because the player is not tackling his whole potential. The outcome is decreased competence where the athlete is not sensing activity effectiveness when embarking, leading to loss of interest. The goal-setting can be applied (Podlog & Eklund 2007) to restore competence in an athlete. However, it is important that goal setting should adhere to the SMART principles (Lawlor 2012), and enable the player to play a role in the goal that is set (Podlog & Eklund 2007), thereby guaranteeing that the autonomy of the player is preserved (Lawlor 2012).

A decrease in athletic identity can result in depression (Yang et al. 2014) via the loss of social support groups, including the members of a team, causing the injured athlete to feel isolated (Cassidy 2006). The motivation towards sport can change (Proios et al. 2012). For instance, a change in motivation spanning from autonomous to controlled (Yang et al. 2014) can lead to change in attitude where the performer might not care regarding their performance (Muller et al. 2013) and thus, do not put entire effort into training leading not being chosen for the team. This can decrease the athletic identity of a person (Yang et al. 2014) and the emotion of isolation because the player is pushed away from team circumstances. To overwhelm the changes in motivation and a loss of social support recommends that the trans-contextual model can be utilized to convey motivation spanning from the coaches to the player. For instance, when the coaches remained independently supportive of the injured player throughout the process of recovery, the performer might not lose their social support network (Cassidy 2006). The player might retain their autonomous motivation because of feeding from the coaches, and this is recognized as vital to rehabilitation adherence (Walker & Thatcher 2011).

Physiological responses

The body constitutes many physiological responses that serve as a mechanism that reacts when a player is injured (Chmielewski et al. 2006). Physiological responses assist in safeguarding and repair the injury. The damaged tissue causes most of the physiological responses to begin. Pain and inflammation highlight the two signs of a sports injury (Yeargin et al. 2019). During a sports march, an athlete might feel a certain amount of pain whereby inflammation will follow. These two aspects articulate how the body cautions the athlete regarding an injury (Chmielewski et al. 2006). These factors should cease the player from engaging for a particular period. Also, pain and inflation play a significant role in stopping any sporting activity because it impedes further injury and aggravating the present one (Edwards et al. 2018).

Increased fluid, restrained movement, and sensitiveness to touch are attained through pain and inflation experienced by a sports player (Yeargin et al. 2019). The increased flow of blood will signify the start of the healing process of the athlete. The rising quantities of fluids happen when the body emits many chemicals that handle the injury that constitute various tools that impact the recovery of an athlete (Iturricastillo et al. 2016). The rising quantities of fluid reflect the protection of the player. The movement is restrained, and there is no longer any occurrence of damage when the player protects the injured body part. The injured part becomes tender after contact (Burns et al. 2012). The body's physiological responses liaise together, thereby making the process of healing more effective and efficient.

Scar tissue is vital for the process of healing of an athlete. It replaces the ordinary tissue after it has been damaged. Collagen highlights a protein that is less efficient and effective at meeting its role and responsibilities. Arguably, the scar tissue assists during the healing and recovery process of a player (Burns et al. 2012).

Bibliography

Baglione, A.N., Girard, M.M., Price, M., Clawson, J. and Shih, P.C., 2018, April. Modern bereavement: a model for complicated grief in the digital age. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-12).

Brooks, J.H., Fuller, C.W., Kemp, S.P. and Reddin, D.B., 2006. Incidence, risk, and prevention of hamstring muscle injuries in professional rugby union. The American journal of sports medicine, 34(8), pp.1297-1306.

Burns, P., Kressler, J. and Nash, M., 2012. Physiological responses to exergaming after spinal cord injury. Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation, 18(4), pp.331-339.

Cassidy, A., 2006. Evolutionary psychology as public science and boundary work. Public Understanding of Science, 15(2), pp.175-205.

Chmielewski, T.L., Myer, G.D., Kauffman, D. and Tillman, S.M., 2006. Plyometric exercise in the rehabilitation of athletes: physiological responses and clinical application. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 36(5), pp.308-319.

Edwards, T., Barfield, J.P., Niemiro, G.M., Beals, J.W., Broad, E.M., Motl, R.W., De Lisio, M., Burd, N.A. and Pilutti, L.A., 2018. Physiological responses during a 25-km time trial in elite wheelchair racing athletes. Spinal cord series and cases, 4(1), pp.1-7.

Evans, L., Hare, R. and Mullen, R., 2006. Imagery use during rehabilitation from injury. Journal of Imagery Research in Sport and Physical Activity, 1(1).

Finch, C.F. and Cook, J., 2014. Categorising sports injuries in epidemiological studies: the subsequent injury categorisation (SIC) model to address multiple, recurrent and exacerbation of injuries. Br J Sports Med, 48(17), pp.1276-1280.

Halliwell, E. and Dittmar, H., 2003. A qualitative investigation of women's and men's body image concerns and their attitudes toward aging. Sex roles, 49(11-12), pp.675-684.

Iturricastillo, A., Yanci, J., Los Arcos, A. and Granados, C., 2016. Physiological responses between players with and without spinal cord injury in wheelchair basketball small-sided games. Spinal cord, 54(12), pp.1152-1157.

Ivancic, P.C., 2014. Cervical spine instability following axial compression injury: a biomechanical study. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research, 100(1), pp.127-133.

Lawlor, K.B., 2012. Smart goals: How the application of smart goals can contribute to achievement of student learning outcomes. In Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning: Proceedings of the Annual ABSEL Conference (Vol. 39).

Levy, A.R., Polman, R.C., Nicholls, A.R. and Marchant, D.C., 2009. Sport injury rehabilitation adherence: Perspectives of recreational athletes. International journal of sport and exercise psychology, 7(2), pp.212-229.

Madrigal, L. and Gill, D.L., 2014. Psychological responses of division I female athletes throughout injury recovery: A case study approach. Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology, 8(3), pp.276-298.

Mueller-Wohlfahrt, H.W., Haensel, L., Mithoefer, K., Ekstrand, J., English, B., McNally, S., Orchard, J., van Dijk, C.N., Kerkhoffs, G.M., Schamasch, P. and Blottner, D., 2013. Terminology and classification of muscle injuries in sport: the Munich consensus statement. British journal of sports medicine, 47(6), pp.342-350.

Muller, W., Horn, M., Furhapter-Rieger, A., Kainz, P., Kropfl, J.M., Ackland, T.R., Lohman, T.G., Maughan, R.J., Meyer, N.L., Sundgot-Borgen, J. and Stewart, A.D., 2013. Body composition in sport: interobserver reliability of a novel ultrasound measure of subcutaneous fat tissue. Br J Sports Med, 47(16), pp.1036-1043.

Patatoukas, D., Farmakides, A., Aggeli, V., Fotaki, S., Tsibidakis, H., Mavrogenis, A., Papathanasiou, J. and Papagelopoulos, P., 2011. Disability-related injuries in athletes with disabiliti...