Essay Example on Social Psychology: Non-Scientific yet Highly Impactful

The word 'science' appears in the quote of 'Non-scientific' simply to show that social psychology is not by any case science connected. Social psychology highly deals with beliefs, feelings, goals, intentions, as well as thoughts. It's highly connected to people's social life. Social psychology has many contributions as well as strengths but not scientific-based, as many may think. Some of the human social practices, such as religions, are some examples of non-scientific practices, as they have no scientific method of investigating their practices. Therefore, this task will review to what extent does modern professional life reflects towards non-scientific practices such as astrology and religion.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Most people think that these social practices are overstated. For a period, the researchers have been trying to study and find a solution to this issue as it has been affecting many individuals. Some of these practices, i.e., religion, has highly lead to social psychology problems in people's lives according to modern professional life. The extent to which the practices are reflected by the current life can be said to be "riding the wings of a strong, hard, and cold wind."

Modern professional life is always questionable with these social practices. Many studies have highly shown, as well as demonstrating most of these practices and how there are used (Lavorgna & Di, 2019). Most social psychologists normally use these social practices when performing their research, and the outcome is false conclusions. For example, the demonstration of these practices and how they provide a conclusion can make a person wonder how the conclusion was obtained.

Some of the social psychologists are always ready to participate in support of non-scientific practice discrimination. For a period of time, there have been differences between social psychologists and the researchers as a result of non-scientific practices (Lavorgna & Di, 2019). Most of the researchers have been trying to conserve by researching more about non-scientific social practices; thus, there are reviewed to be supporting these practices.

According to the researcher's social perception in psychology normally reflects two scientific sins, but non-scientific practices it's not present (Sellnow & Sellnow, 2017). These sins normally involve overemphasis on the dramatic issue. In social psychology, there is a foregone conclusion, fulfilling some prophecies which most people have proven. These prophecies are either misinterpreted or irreplaceable. The sins which are normally available in scientific practices help in ignoring some robust and replicable results which frequently appear connected with some particular theoretical agendas. For example, in non-scientific social practice, there are two relationships that are powerful and reproducible in all social psychology. These are; stereotype accuracy as well as relying on stereotyping information, which is highly ignored in non-scientific practices.

Some documents that are recorded about non-scientific practices have lost their meaning in people's lives as they do not have any scientific support. Most of the people are normally attracted to what is moving hands in hands with their perceptions. Some years back, there was a study that stated that providing young individuals with elderly stereotypes made them walk away. This paper is reported to have been used in citing over 2000 times. This information is irreplaceable recently.

There is a higher level of discrimination in social practices. According to Haidt, he talked about the large disproportionate number of liberals in the social psychology view (Lavorgna & Di, 2019). According to him, he was not sure about his information. Still, he suggested that the two issues he was talking about highly reflective and cause discrimination on the non-scientific practices. Also, he added that discrimination does not only fall on the non-scientific conservers but also some scientific conclusions which are valid, and they support the positions of non-liberals in the field of political, social psychology.

The above issues deserve to be handled effectively one at a time. People should handle each entry carefully and address it in a detailed manner. In case this issue is not pointed out, some changes will occur as the wind may blow steady and harder. Although some of the researchers have reacted on these changes to prevent additional issues, the winds of changes are strongly blowing in the "Social Psychological Halls of Power" (Sellnow & Sellnow, 2017).

Conclusion

In conclusion, people should understand that social psychology is not based on science as most of the suggestions. However, they should know that social psychology is highly connected with scientific studies. In social psychology, scientific studies normally help to understand the feelings, thoughts as well as behaviours of people, which are usually influenced by the presence of other individuals. Social practices such as religion have been profoundly affected by modern professional life as many social practices are normally based on a few characteristics in social psychology. Some of these characteristics are; stereotypes, theory attribution, social influence, and social cognition. However, none of these characteristics is observed in non-scientific social practices.

References

Lavorgna, A., & Di Ronco, A. (Eds.). (2019). Medical Misinformation and Social Harm in Non-Science Based Health Practices: A Multidisciplinary Perspective. Routledge.

Sellnow, D. D., & Sellnow, T. L. (2017). Lessons Learned about Best Practices for Communicating Earthquake Forecasting and Early Warning to Non-Scientific Publics. AGUFM, 2017, PA23D-01.