Essay Example on Creole: Pidgin-to-Standard Language Transformation

Introduction

Creole in linguistics underscores a natural language type that has been historically developed prom pidgin and has come to exist at a premise of time that is fairly (Nordquist, 2019). Creoles in English have majorly spoken in among others Cameroon, Sierra Leone, Jamaica, and other parts of Georgia. Creolization informs the historical translation from pidgin to creole as decreolization underlies the transformation of creole to a standard language or acrolet. Like Pidgin, Creole, as a language, has taken its vocabularies from another language, albeit has its grammatical rule uniqueness, and unlike pidgin, the use of creoles is not restricted hence can be used for vast functions (Mufweme, 2020). Creoles are, therefore, not varieties in English since their formation is a result of interaction between nonstandard varieties speakers of European and non-European languages or might have emerged from contacts between primarily Non-European languages that may not necessarily be English.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Disagreements over the Creole Roots of Black English in the US

Black English has often been displayed as creole roots owing to the vital roles of aspects in grammar, and the issue is yet to be examined as a standard fact since tense plays vita; elements in the morphology of black English than in the West African languages as advocates of the creolists hypothesis pay insufficient attention to English dialects since the role of those aspects in nonstandard British dialects is never addressed. The argumentative of the gap the link of black element English to Africa and creole incomplete, which may be of significance since nonstandard English dialects are evidenced with more issues that focus on Standard English.

Origin of Creoles

Creoles first came into existence following the foundation of America's creoles by the Spain and Portugal colonies and used initially in the 16th Century to refer to individuals that were locally born in Portugal, Spain or Africa. It was later adapted into French, with some extern of English, and used about European or African descents who were born in the Indian Ocean colonies or America or an adjective to characterize plants and animals. Linguistics have often underscored that creoles emerged from pidgins that underlie languages with reduced vocabularies and grammars that are evident when mutually in intelligible groups intermittently come together (Mufweme, 2020). Scholars on the other had juxtaposed three primary hypotheses on the creole development vernacular that underlie substrate to indicate the non-European language, super street to indicate European languages. The last one is universalists with the claim of creoles origin from the universality of language development rendering a lexical learning hypothesis (Mufweme, 2020). The speculations on creoles' origin may still be disputed as more research is yet required before its development is fully comprehended.

Creoles as Non-Varieties in English

Creoles emergence is owed to pidgin when the latter becomes the mother tongue of a speech community, and it may be simplified or mixed, albeit not reduced. Since creole underscores a vast range of functions, the pidgin vocabulary ha to expand to an elaborate syntactic system hence used for all essential purposes as pleased by the speaker accordingly cannot form varieties in English (Winford, 2008). Pidginization reduction informed the repairmen of the expansion process, thereby known as realization processes that see the expansion and development of vocabulary, coupled with the addition of grammatical categories and devices that are added to language wit most styles. Creoles development into pidgin can be understood in two spheres. One is whereby a pidgin speaker is put in a compromising position that he cannot communicate in their mother tongue prevalently in the Caribbean during the slave trade (Hummel, 2000). That may result in children born by a parent with no common language save for pidgin, thereby making the children automatically acquire creole language. Another instance is when pidgin has been commonly used in a community and may see expansion even by people with common mother tongue; hence it becomes familiar to parents and children to acquire it. That renders creoles as a non-result of an individual's inability to use the mother tongue but rather an extension of pidgin; hence hey may not be varieties in English.

However, creoles should not be viewed from a dimension of a separate class of language, but rather a particular level with a general phenomenon of it use as a considerable determination of property that informs a socially reserved typology of languages (Muyesken, 2016). That is seen through its continuous evolvement is diverse regions from pidgins, albeit not varieties in English. Creoles' emergence and diversification into language may have been informed by displacement and which may be vital. However, creoles may be insufficient and mixture, which may be essential in restructuring the lexifier language, although at times with a simplified outcome (Muyesken, 2016). The combination of genesis time, mixture, displacement, and restructuring might, therefore, underscore the creoles' status as a language, which is far from a unified notion. Creoles can be presented in several types, combined with different creole like languages, albeit differ in terms of the combination criteria and depicted as unique and not a separate class but are not varieties in English.

Conclusion

The Creole language has often led to arise in linguistic curiosity, albeit viewed to be spoken by low prestige societies. Its origin is depicted to be from pidgin language or a combination of expressions that may have been simplified. While some view it as vague, others represent it as an individual and not a separate language, and they are not varieties in English. English is just one of the superstrate language in which creoles are made up of besides pidgin. Creoles, however, can perform diverse functions and, just like English, undergo standardization. Pidgin and creoles, therefore, instead of being studied as separate languages, should be considered into a broader context of linguistic contact typology rather than being considered in isolation.

References

Hummel, A., 2000.Pidgins and Creoles. Grin. Available athttps://www.grin.com/document/103539

Nordquist, R., 2019. What You Should Know About the Creole Language ThoughtCo. Availableat https://www.thoughtco.com/what-is-creole-language-1689942

Mufweme, S., 2020.Creole Languages. Encyclopedia Britannica. Available athttps://www.britannica.com/topic/creole-languages

Muyesken, P., 2016.Linguistics; Creole Languages. Oxford Research Encyclopedia. Available athttps://oxfordre.com/linguistics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.001.0001/acrefoe-9780199384655-e-68? result=1&rskey=VPeUIc

Winford, D., 2008. Atlantic Creole Syntax. Wiley Online Library. Available athttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781444305982.ch2